Logical Fallacies Flashcards
Argument based on limited or biased sample to reach conclusion; leads to faulty conclusion
Hasty generalization
Argument based on unqualified generalization
Dicto simpliciter
sweeping generalization; stereotyping
Assumes A caused B simply because A happened prior to B. Often superstitions arise from this kind of logic.
Post hoc, ergo prompter hoc
The two premises contradict; therefore, the logic is faulty; this fallacy’s most popular appearance is in the form of a challenging question, because questions with contradictory premises are such brain teasers.
Contradictory premises
Someone tries to win support for their argument or ideas by exploiting her or his opponent’s feelings of pity or guilt.
Ad Misericordiam
appeal for sympathy
In this type of logic, though A and B may be similar in one respect (such as colour) they may not both share property X (e.g. size)
False analogy
This fallacy consists of offering a poorly supported claim about what might have happened in the past or future if circumstances or conditions were other than they actually were or are. The fallacy also involves treating hypothetical situations as if they were fact.
Hypothesis contrary to fact
Where adverse information about a target is preemptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say.
Poisoning the well
Using the same term with different meanings
Equivocation
Circular logic
The conclusion does not follow the argument; missing step; no direct relationship
Non sequitur ("It does not follow")
Assumes that something is true when it is in need of proof
Begging the question
Ignores the real issue by the use of distracting information
Ignoring the question
Red herring
All options are not taken into account in the solution posed by the major premise
Faulty Dilemma
Either/or reasoning
Ignores the real issue by turning attention to an individual; occurs in the midst of an argument.
Ad hominem
To the person
Logical Structure:
Formal logical reasoning containing 3 parts: 1 major premise, 1 minor premise, and a conclusion.
Each part must be categorical.
All A are B, All C are A, therefore all C are B.
_____ use careful diction and syntax.
Syllogism
Major premise can’t be faulty