Logic Reasoning Flashcards
If X, then Y
If Joan had gotten an A on her paper, she could pass the course without doing the presentation.
X → Y
not Y → not X
A on paper → can pass w/o pres.
can’t pass w/o pres. → not A on paper
X if Y
People can feel secure if they are governed by laws that are not vague.
Y → X
not X → not Y
not vague laws → can feel secure
can’t feel secure → vague laws
Pay attention to the location of the word “if”! Wherever “if” appears within the sentence, it will be immediately followed by the trigger, regardless of whether “if” is at the beginning or in the middle of the sentence.
X only if Y
Knowledge can be gained only if medical consent is sometimes bypassed.
X → Y
not Y → not X
knowledge can be gained → med. consent sometimes bypassed
med. consent never bypassed → knowledge can’t be gained
“Only if” is not the same thing as “if”. “Only if” indicates a necessary condition while “if” by itself indicates a sufficient condition. On Test Day, try simply changing “only if” into an arrow!
Only X are Y
Only propositions that can be proven true can be known to be true.
Only those proposals the director supports will be approved.
Y → X
not X → not Y
can be known to be true → can be proven true
can’t be proven true → can’t be known to be true
“Only” indicates a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition.
approved → director support
[Some proposals the director supports will not be approved]
[Director support doesn’t guarantee approval]
Any X is/are Y
Any moon, by definition, orbits a planet.
X → Y
not Y → not X
moon → orbits planet
not orbit planet → not moon
Every X is Y
Every student who walks to school goes home for lunch.
X → Y
not Y → not X
walk to school → goes home for lunch
not go home for lunch→ not walk to school
No X is/are Y
No strictly physical theory can explain consciousness.
X → not Y
Y → not X
strictly physical theory → can’t explain consciousness
can explain consciousness → not strictly physical theory
Diagram meanings; don’t diagram the statements word by word. “No X is Y” doesn’t mean “not X → Y”. Instead, it means that everything that is X, isn’t Y.
X cannot be Y
Fitness consultants who smoke cigarettes cannot help their clients become healthier.
X → not Y
Y → not X
smoke cigarettes → can’t help clients get healthier
can help clients get healthier → don’t smoke cigarettes
Without X there can be no Y
Without self-understanding it is impossible to understand others.
7SAGE says:
* no self understanding → impossible to understand others
* possible to understand others → self understanding
Group 3: You pick either idea, then negate that idea, then make that idea the sufficient condition. → this makes more sense to me
KHAN says:
Y → X
not X → not Y
understand others → self-understanding
not self-understanding → not understand others
This is basically saying that X is necessary for Y to be true. So, if you don’t have X, you can’t have Y.
X requires Y
Novelists require some impartiality to get an intuitive grasp of the motions of everyday life.
X → Y
not Y → not X
The goal is the sufficient condition (on the left), while the requirement is to the right of the arrow. That’s because if a goal is met, then you can be certain that the requirement for the goal must also have been met.
intuitive grasp → impartiality
partiality → no intuitive grasp
In order for X to be true, Y must be true
In order to understand Stuart’s art, Robbins must be able to pass judgment on it.
X → Y
not Y → not X
The goal is the sufficient condition (on the left), while the requirement is to the right of the arrow. That’s because if a goal is met, then you can be certain that the requirement for the goal must also have been met.
understand S’s art → able to pass judgment
not able to pass judgment → not understand S’s art
X depends on Y
The existence of a moral order depends upon human souls being immortal.
X → Y
not Y → not X
moral order → human souls immortal
human souls not immortal → no moral order
What is “depended on” is the necessary condition. We depend on air to survive, so air is necessary. “X depends on Y” means that Y is necessary (not sufficient).
X happens whenever Y happens
Inflation occurs whenever the money supply grows more than the production of goods and services grows.
Y → X
not X → not Y
money supply grows more than production grows → inflation
no inflation → money supply didn’t grow more than production grew
What event follows the other? Every time Y happens, X happens. That means that Y is the trigger for X condition to happen 100% of the time that Y happens.
No X unless Y
Ann would not quit unless she were offered a fellowship.
7SAGE says:
* quit → offered internship
* not offered internship → not quit
Group 3: You pick either idea, then negate that idea, then make that idea the sufficient condition.
KHAN says:
X → Y
not Y → not X
Ann quits → Ann was offered fellowship
Ann not offered fellowship → Ann doesn’t quit
“Unless” doesn’t indicate a trigger! It always indicates a necessary condition. “I can’t go to the beach unless I find my sunscreen”: if I find my sunscreen, that doesn’t actually mean anything; I could still just stay home. But I need to find my sunscreen in order to even have a shot at going to the beach. So:
beach → sunscreen
no sunscreen → no beach
Only if a sentence can be diagrammed is it grammatical.
Any grammatical sentence is recognized as grammatical by speakers of its language.
Speaker X’s sentence can be diagrammed. So, speaker X’s sentence will be recognized as grammatical by speakers of its language.
The linguist’s reasoning is flawed because it fails to consider the possiblity that
https://www.khanacademy.org/prep/lsat/task/6116664795512832/question/6
grammatical → can be diagrammed
grammatical → recognized as grammatical by speakers of its language
grammatical → can be diagrammed => this is a necessary condition to be grammatical
The support says that all grammatical sentences can be diagrammed.
But the support doesn’t say that all diagrammable sentences are grammatical. Just because a sentence must be diagrammable in order to be considered grammatical, doesn’t mean that it is necessarily grammatical just because it can be diagrammed.