Loftus & Palmer Et Al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Schema Theory

A

It suggests that memory is altered by what an individual already knows, and use of past experience is what a human mind uses to work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does it propose knowledge is?

A

It proposes that knowledge is stored in a set of schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the background to the experiment regarding memory?

A

The background is that memory can be distorted via past experiences and little things such as words used in questioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the design of experiment 1?

A

The design of experiment 1 was individual measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the IV of Experiment 1?

A

The IV was the wording if a critical question in the questionnaire/ The verb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the leading question of experiment 1?

A

The leading question was “About how fast were the cars going when they (IV) each other”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the different words used in the experiment 1?

A

Hit/Smashed/Collided/Contacted/Bumped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the DV of experiment 1?

A

The DV Was he estimated speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the experiment design of experiment 2?

A

Independent Measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the conditions of both tests?

A

Laboratory Conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the IV of exp 2?

A

The wording on the leading question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the 3 different leading questions in Exp 2?

A

1: About how fast were the cars going when they Smashed into each other
2: About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other
3: NOT ASKED ABOUT SPEED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the second leading questions for Exp 2?

A

Did you see any broken glass?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the DV for Exp 2?

A

The answer for the leading question “Yes/No”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the sample of exp 1?

A

45 Pax
5 Groups
9 in each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the sample of exp 2?

A

150 Pax
3 groups
50 in each

17
Q

Procedure of Exp 1?

A

Shown 7 clips of different traffic accidents
Given questionnaire to describe the accident and then answer questions
Critical question: About how fast were the cars going when they (IV) each other
Each group had different verb

18
Q

What was the procedure if exp 2?

A

Participants shown 4 second clip of car crash
Given questionnaire to describe the accident and answer questions
Leading question on speed
One week later asked if they saw any broken glass

19
Q

What were the speed estimates for each verb in Exp 1?

A
Smashed  40.5
Collided.   39.3
Bumped.   38.1
Hit.             34.0
Contacted 31.8
20
Q

Yes/no response ration for each verb used in Exp 2?

A

Smashed Y16:N34
Hit. Y7:N43
Control. Y6:N44

21
Q

what were some if the conclusions?

A

Verbs can influence answers
People are not good at judging vehicular speed
Misleading post event information can distort memory

22
Q

What area does this come under?

A

Cognitive