Loftus & Palmer - CLASSIC Flashcards

1
Q

What was the main hypothesis of the study?

A

The language used in eyewitness testimony can alter memory

This hypothesis suggests that the way questions are phrased can influence a witness’s recollection of events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim of the study?

A

To show that leading questions could distort eyewitness testimony

Leading questions are those that suggest a particular answer or contain information that can influence the response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of experiment was conducted?

A

Lab experiment with independent measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the sample size for Experiment 1?

A

45 students from University of Washington

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the sample size for Experiment 2?

A

150 students from University of Washington

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of sampling method was used for the participants?

A

Opportunity/convenience sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What materials were used in Experiment 1?

A

7 film clips, questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the main material used in Experiment 2?

A

1 minute film containing car crash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Procedure for experiment 1?

A

45 Participants, 5 groups for 5 verbs.

Verbs:
Smashed
Collided
Bumped
Hit
Contacted

Watched 7 clips of car crash/road safety videos.

Critical question : ’How fast were the cars going when they ______ each other?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure for experiment 2?

A

150 participants, 3 groups for 2 verbs and 1 control group

Verbs:
Hit
Smashed

Watched 1 minute video of a multiple car crash.

1 week later, participants were asked, ’Did you see any broken glass?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Results for experiment 1?

A

Mean speed estimates:

Smashed - 40.5mph
//
Contacted - 31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Results for experiment 2?

A

Saw broken glass VS Did not see broke glass
Smashed = 16:34
Hit = 7:43
Control = 6:44

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

IVs and DVs

A

IV for both:
- verb used

DV for 1:
- estimation of speed

DV for 2:
- glass or no glass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusions

A

Questioning techniques can distort memory.
Memory is susceptible to change and decay.
Both information during and after an event can distort memories and create false ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a strength of lab experiments?

A

High internal validity

Lab experiments are designed to control extraneous variables, allowing for more accurate conclusions about cause and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a weakness of lab experiments?

A

Low ecological validity

Lab experiments often lack real-world applicability due to their artificial settings.

17
Q

Strengths of using independent measures design?

A

No order effects

Participants are only exposed to one condition, eliminating potential biases from their experience in multiple conditions.

Less time consuming

This design allows researchers to gather data more quickly as each participant contributes to only one condition.

18
Q

Weakness of independent measures?

A

Participant variables

Individual differences among participants that can affect results

These variables can introduce bias if not controlled, influencing the outcome of the study.

19
Q

What ethical considerations are mentioned in the context of the study?

A

Deception, confidentiality, harm, debrief, withdrawal, and consent

20
Q

What was a key issue regarding valid consent in the experiment?

A

Participants were not aware of the true aim of the experiment

21
Q

What potential psychological harm was highlighted in the study?

A

Car crashes could be traumatising

22
Q

What does high internal validity indicate in this study?

A

No external variables affected the results

23
Q

What is a noted limitation regarding external validity?

A

Lab setting is artificial; only staged clips were used instead of real crashes

24
Q

How is reliability assessed in this study?

A

The study is standardised; participants were asked the same questions and watched the same videos

25
Q

What is a concern regarding sampling bias in this study?

A

College students do not reflect older people who may have worse memory

26
Q

What ethnocentric issue is present in the study’s sample?

A

Only American students from the ** University of Washington** were included, making the results not generalisable