Locke Flashcards
what is Filmer’s argument on the divine right of kings?
- FIlmer defended absolutism which is the doctrine that every king has an empire either by inheritance or by translation and usurpation
- Forms his basis on the bible (gen 1:28) where Adam is the sole ruler and proprietor of the world in the beginning
What is Filmer’s arg on Beginnings?
- rests his argument on the bible, which has “more authority” and “given us the true grounds and principles of government”
What does Gen 1:28 mean?
- the world was given to Adam in fee - a property right that descends through lawful heirs
- Kings and Queens were natural descendants of Adam hence that enjoyed property rights to their part of the world.
How did Filmer deal with the King not being the only ruler?
- Concluded that they ruled in an exchange. Land was given to them for a promise of absolute obedience
- Individual rights are condescension from the King
- Claimed political authority is derived from original property right
What is natural law?
i) self preservation. (everyone has a duty to preserve themselves)
ii) the preservation of mankind (once you have fulfilled the first duty an obligation to preserve the rest of mankind arises)
What is Locke’s argument against Filmer’s?
- Political society arises from the consent and mandate of individuals - indv posses the power to remove the mandate if the gov abuses its position
- Govs only had a jurisdictional power - the right to regulate disputes and no right to establish property rights for indv in society
- prop rights based on natural law
Where does Locke’s argument depart from Filmer’s?
- Adam was given the world as common property and not private property
- established the theory of appropriation to explain how private property is obtained from common property
what is the theory of appropriation?
- the way we acquire property is through labour.
- labour justifies our acquisition of property 9this can be delegated)
- no gov is needed to give effect to this theory
How does labour result in appropriation?
1) workmanship arg - based on the relationship between God and man. Man is dependent on God as Man is a design made by God. Same applies for what Man makes/produces
2) Self ownership arg - there are property rights in our bodies and we own what our bodily capacities produce
what are the limits to appropriation?
1) you must ‘leave enough and as good’ for others
- people are limited by what is sufficient to them
2) you must not waste what you appropriate
3) you can only acquire property through labour
How does the theory of appropriation relate to the colonisation of america?
1) No political society
2) Abundance - colonisers can acquire as much land as they wish for self preservation.
3) Efficiency - Property rights of native Americans need not be respected as they use land inefficiently. (based on the assumption that they are simply hunter and gatherers)
4) Legality - Natives are opposing natural law when they refuse to be colonised
How does the theory of appropriation relate to the Formation of the Eng Gov?
1) Prop > Gov - Common right to land is given by God and the gov administer/secures those rights
2) We have a natural, common right to property
3) Property = life, liberty - a meaning broader than a right to things
- it encompasses a personal sphere of autonomy that encompasses your life and the thing you own
How does Locke justify the transformation of common property to private property without breaching the law of nature?
2 species of property right
1) Claim right
- future ownership. sth you dont possess now but can be obtained at future point
2) Actual ownership
Common property = claim right - no one can be excluded from appropriating land
Labour turns a claim right into an actual right (recognised by English law)
What is the BASIS of theory of possessive individualism?
1) We are all selfish
- assumes that we are all fundamentally selfish people
- not sharers of nature
- interact only through exchange
2) We are all equal
- no one person can command another
What is the theory of possessive individualism?
- Property enables us to realise our potential and secures our autonomy
1) Gives stability - allow us to build up and plan for the future
2) Makes us independent
3) Cultivates virtues