*Loan Security (more detailed) Flashcards
In addition to the min. valuation report requirements, what must also be reported for loan security valuations THAT IS OR WILL BE SUBJECT OF DEVELOPMENT (5)?
- Comment on costs
- Implication of cost overruns
- Comment on viability
- Sensitivity analysis for residual valuations
- Comment on development timelines
What are typical special assumptions for loan security valuations THAT IS OR WILL BE SUBJECT OF DEVELOPMENT (2, extra 1 subject to particular special assumption)?
- Works complete
- Completed development let or sold
- Where a valuation is required on the special assumption that the work had been completed as of a current valuation date, the value reported should be based on current market conditions. If a valuation is required on the special assumption that the work has been completed as of a future date and the valuation date is as of that future date, the valuer is reminded of the requirements for developing and reporting the opinion of value.
When might a property not be suitable for secured lending (tenure, environmental, lease)?
Short leasehold interest, high flood risk, tenant break option very soon (cannot guarantee income for any period of time)
What is the normal valuation basis for lending instructions, and what should you do if that won’t be applicable for the instruction?
o Market Value is the basis for LSV and is defined in IVS 104 (MV definition as normal)
o Where the circumstances are different to this, the valuer and client should agree on a special assumption.
What 5 broad areas does RB VPGA 2 cover?
Conflict of interest checks – within 24 months Taking instructions Use MV basis Assumptions and special assumptions Reporting and disclosures
What does VPGA 2 state re. dealing with conflicts of interests for lending instructions?
o Valuer has had no previous, current or anticipated involvement with the borrower or prospective borrower, the asset to be valued or any other party connected with a transaction for which the lending is required.
o ‘Previous involvement’ would normally be anything within the period of 24 months preceding the date of the instruction or date of agreement of the TOE (whichever is earlier) Also should consider the level of fees earned from any connected party as a proportion of total fee income.
Outline some typical examples (5) of ‘previous involvement’ under RB VPGA 2.
Long-standing professional relationship with the borrower or owner of the property or asset
Introducing transaction to lender or the borrower, for which a fee is payable to the valuer or firm
Has a financial interest in the asset or in the borrower
Is acting for the owner of the property or asset in a related transaction.
Is acting (or has acted) for the borrower on the purchase of the property or asset
Under RB VPGA 2, what should you do if you are instructed by a borrower who does not disclose the lender?
o If the borrower approaches you for a report, but does not disclose the lender, you should make a statement to the effect of the valuation may not be acceptable to a lender (some lenders see borrower procured reports as insuffuciently independent, or have additional requirements)
What 2 main pieces of info does VPGA 2 advice the valuer to request off the lender?
o The valuer should enquire if there has been a recent transaction or provisionally agreed price, and further enquiries e.g. marketing, effect of any incentives, whether best price obtainable
o The valuer should request details of the terms of the lending facility being contemplated by the lender.
What is MLV, how does VPGA 2 advice it should be reported, and why?
Sometimes described as a ‘mark to model’ valuation approach to distinguish it from a ‘mark to market’ approach, the (‘mortgage lending value’) valuation output must only be used for the particular purpose for which it is provided. This is because often the bases forms part of a risk assessment tool, the risk being viewed primarily from the lenders perspective across an extended period of time.
Under VPGA 2, what must you state if you have made a special assumption?
o Any valuation for secured lending purposes arrived at by making a special assumption must be accompanied by a comment on any material difference between the reported value with and without that special assumption.
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. the way you valued a property?
The valuation method adopted, supported (where appropriate or requested) with the calculation used (note that in some jurisdictions, the method or methodology itself will be prescribed in some degree).
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. proposed agreed prices (or in the absence of being provided with one)?
Where a recent transaction on the property has occurred or a provisionally agreed price has been disclosed, the extent to which that information has been accepted as evidence of value. This should be accompanied by a request that if such information (or further information) comes to light before the loan is finalised, the matter must be referred back to the valuer for further consideration
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. a property’s security for a loan?
Comment on the suitability of the property as security for mortgage purposes, bearing in mind the length and terms of the loan being contemplated. Where the terms are not known, the comment should be restricted to the general marketability of the property
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. any factors that could affect the price?
Any circumstances of which the valuer is aware that could affect the price (these must also be drawn to the attention of the lender, and an indication of their effect must be provided)
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. any other factors that may conflict with the agreed basis of value?
Any other factor that potentially conflicts with the definition of the basis of value or its underlying assumptions must be noted and its effect explained
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. the property use in relation to market conditions?
Potential and demand for alternative uses, or any foreseeable changes in the current mode or category of occupation
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. the market conditions in relation to the property and the loan?
The potential occupational demand for the property
Past, current and future trends, and any volatility in the local market and/or demand for the category of property
The current marketability of the interest and whether it is likely to be sustainable over the life of the loan
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. property condition and environmental/planning issues?
Disrepair, or whether any deleterious or harmful materials have been noted
Comment on any environmental or economic designation
Comment on environmental issues, such as flood risk potential, historic contamination or non-conforming uses
What does VPGA 2 advise you to include in your report re. the comparable evidence used?
Details of any significant comparable transactions relied upon and their relevance to the valuation
What emerging factor (VPGA 2 reporting) should you make a comment on?
Sustainability factors (see VPGA 8) are becoming a more significant market influence and valuations for secured lending should always have appropriate regard to their relevance to the particular assignment.
Under VPGA 2 reporting requirements, what additional 5 areas should you report/comment on (think leases, rent, occupiers, the loan and property potential)?
a summary of occupational leases, indicating whether the leases have been read or not, and the source of any information relied on
a statement of, and commentary on, current rental income, and comparison with current market rental value. Where the property comprises a number of different units that can be let individually, separate information should be provided on each
an assumption as to covenant strength where there is no information readily available, or comment on the market’s view of the quality, suitability and strength of the tenant’s covenant
comment on maintainability of income over the life of the loan (and any risks to the maintainability of income), with particular reference to lease breaks or determinations and anticipated market trends – this may well need to be considered in a broader sustainability context and
comment on any potential for redevelopment or refurbishment at the end of the occupational lease(s)
Why are there a more diverse range of lenders now, and what is the overriding objective for the valuer?
As the ‘mainstream’ established lenders are subject to enhanced regulatory and capital requirements, a range of alternative lenders have emerged who may operate on different business models.
o The overriding objective is that the valuer should understand the lender’s requirements and the lender should understand the advice that is given
Why should a valuer disclose any potential circumstances that could be considered a conflict to a lender?
o Lenders usually have distinct internal risk and compliance policies, which are supplementary to the satisfaction of regulatory requirements. In this context, a valuer’s opinion of what circumstances could give rise to a conflict may differ from the perspective held by a lender.
What term does UK VPGA 10 advise is the minimum ‘conflict position’ you must be in to undertake a secured lending valuation?
o The valuer providing the opinion of value on which the lending decision will ultimately be made will – at a minimum – be expected to be an ‘external valuer’ as defined in the Global Standards Glossary.
What does UK VPGA 10 advise valuers to do to ensure they meet the lenders conflict of interest policy?
o As there is no universally recognised definition of this or other similar terms, it is essential that the valuer ensures the instructing client has defined the term or terms employed in writing, so the criteria for independence being applied are crystal clear. It follows that the valuer must meet those criteria before agreeing to act.
What 2 main things does UK VPGA 10 advise valuers to agree to limit their liability and how must it be documented?
o Prior to accepting any instruction, valuers may or will need to discuss with clients the principle of liability caps and the reliance that will be placed on the valuation. The resultant agreement must be unambiguously documented in both the terms of engagement and the valuation report.
What should a valuer consider when instructed under a panel agreement, and what action may therefore need to be taken?
o Great care must be exercised to ensure that where panel agreements are in place, they are and remain appropriate in relation to individual valuation assignments. This is of as much importance to the lender as to the valuer. The great diversity of circumstances relating to property assets that may be considered for secured lending means that members should be alert to instances where, for specific and identified reasons, standardised terms of engagement may not be appropriate.
What does UK VPGA 10 recommend re. who the LSV report is addressed to?
o For valuations undertaken in the UK, it is strongly recommended that any loan security report is addressed only to the named lender, and not to a broker or potential borrower.
By what 2 measures should you decide upon a liability cap?
o Both parties should have regard to the requirement that any cap in liability should be reasonable and proportionate to the nature of the instruction and their respective exposures to risk. Particular care is required, both to understand the potential extent of liability and to understand its management.
What does UK VPGA 10 recommend re. the default liability limitation position, and what if other beneficiaries are to be included?
o As a default position, the terms of engagement should limit reliance only to the addressee, who should be the named lender. They should also state as default that any third-party reliance is specifically excluded. However, if any other beneficiaries are to be included, as appropriate to the nature of the instruction, these should be specifically named.
Under UK VPGA 10, how should a valuer approach a lenders requirement for an opinion of asset quality?
o A lender may request the valuer to provide an opinion of asset quality in accordance with categories established by regulatory authorities. In these instances, the valuer should confine their response to a direct answer to the questions. Any limitations on the valuer’s ability to complete these questions accurately should be noted.
Under UK VPGA 10, who is responsible for the loan decision, and therefore how should the valuers comments be limited?
o It is wholly the responsibility of the lender to assess and take the final decision on the suitability of the asset for loan security, as this will involve factors other than the property being taken as collateral. Any comments by the valuer should be limited to those property or market factors that could or may have an impact on cash flow, value or liquidity.
Under UK VPGA 10, what requirements must be met if forward looking advice is provided to the lender?
o The valuer is only expected to provide an opinion based on information that is readily available in the market and/or is reasonably foreseeable. Where forward looking advice is provided to the lender, it must meet the requirements of VPS 3 section 2 paragraph 2(e) subparagraph 3 and VPS 4 section 11.
In contact law, what is ‘implied’?
• Whether its terms say it or not, a contract for professional services is usually considered to be subject to an ‘implied term’ that the services to be provided by the professional will not fall below the standards of skill and care expected from a reasonable body of the professional’s peers. In effect, this means that the professional undertakes not to act negligently.
How is ‘tort’ different to a breach of contact, and what standard of care is a valuer held to?
A ‘tort’ is an umbrella term for all civil wrongs recognised by the law, other than breach of contract. When we refer to claims against valuers in tort, we usually mean claims for the tort of negligence. In practice, a tort claim holds a valuer to the same standard of care as the implied contractual term not to act negligently.
What question will a Court ask when considering a valuer’s negligence, and what additional consideration will they take into account?
o The usual question the courts ask is what are the maximum and minimum valuations that could be given by a reasonable valuer in the actual valuer’s position (assessed by a valuer’s peers).
o To be found negligent, the actual valuation must generally have fallen outside that ‘bracket’ of hypothetical reasonable valuations.
o The courts may sometimes also consider whether there were any specific errors made by the valuer in the course of the valuation. If there were, that could increase the chances of the valuation being held to be outside the bracket. This means that a valuer cannot focus purely on the end figure; the process followed by the valuer and the text of a valuation report are also important.
What is the SAAMCO Cap, and why should a valuer consider the advice they are giving to a client?
o The SAAMCO Cap: usually restricts the damages to the difference between the valuer’s valuation figure and the figure the court decides was the actual value of the property at the date of the valuation. Therefore, valuers are not generally liable for additional losses suffered by their clients by market depreciation in the property between the date of the valuation and the date of the claim.
o It is important to note that the SAAMCO Cap is based on the principle that providing a valuation is only, in legal terms, providing ‘information’. The cap does not apply if a valuer goes beyond the provision of information and advises a client whether to proceed with a transaction.
Who can sue a valuer for a breach of contract/tort, and why should you be careful with you consent reliance to?
o A claim for breach of contract (or tort) can usually only be brought by a party to the contract, i.e. the client. A valuer can be sued in negligence by those third parties (i.e. those who are not party to the valuation contract) to whom the valuer expressly accepts a duty of care, or those to whom the court says the valuer has assumed a duty of care.
o If the valuer does consent to reliance by a particular third party, they will probably be considered to owe that third party a duty of care. This may enable that party to have the same rights as a client, whilst not being bound by the terms of the valuer’s engagement, including any liability cap
Why does RICS recommend you state re. the purpose of a loan security valuation?
o RICS recommends that, where possible, members should be more specific than saying only that a valuation is provided, for example, ‘for secured lending purposes’. Although a member may not have full visibility of what a client hopes or intends to use the valuation for, they should record what they consent to it being used for. They should consider including wording along the following lines (again, secured lending is used as an example):
‘we consent to its use only in a single secured lending decision.’
Why is it important to include a clause in the valuer’s terms of engagement excluding all personal liability?
o Occasionally, claimants try to bring claims against individual partners, or individual employed valuers, even if the services are provided by an LLP. This means that it is prudent to include a clause in the valuer’s terms of engagement excluding all personal liability.
How is the limitation period for breach of contract different to a tort claim, and why (2 potential circumstances)?
o Generally speaking, the limitation period for bringing a claim against a valuer will be six years from the date of the valuation (breach of contract).
o This period can be longer, particularly where the claim is brought as one for the tort of negligence.
The six-year period for bringing a professional negligence claim does not begin until the claimant incurs loss, which may not be the date when the negligent professional services were provided i.e. starts from the date on which the borrower draws down the loan.
In addition, in 1986 the Limitation Act 1980 gave the claimant three years to bring a claim, from when the claimant learned about his or her entitlement to claim. This three-year period is subject to a ‘long-stop’ period of 15 years from the date of the negligent act, which in a valuation context will usually mean 15 years from the date of the valuation report.
Explain the importance of ‘claims made’ basis provision of PII, and why RICS recommends ‘run-off’ cover.
o PII is provided to firms of valuers on a ‘claims made’ basis. This means that in order for there to be insurance for a claim, there must be an insurance policy in place when the claim is made. For example, for valuations conducted in 2017, the firm should continue buying insurance every year until at least 2023. There is still a risk of a firm or its partners being sued if it ceases practice during that intervening period, which is why RICS requires firms to buy ‘run-off’ PII to cover the period after ceasing practice.
What is a liability cap,
what purpose does it serve,
how must they be drafted to be enforceable,
and why should you perhaps not consider using one when dealing with a ‘consumer’?
o A liability cap is a contractual agreement that a client can only claim damages up to the amount agreed, even if the law would otherwise award a greater sum in damages (applies even where a valuer has conducted a valuation negligently).
o A way to ensure that there is a fair allocation of risk and reward between members and their clients.
o Legally, liability caps are enforceable as long as they are properly incorporated into the contract, and they are at a ‘reasonable’ level.
o Any contract between a business and a consumer will fall within the jurisdiction of the Competition and Markets Authority, which has wide powers to challenge the conduct of any business that is seeking to impose terms that cause unfair detriment to consumers.
Explain the difference between a liability cap and a firm’s professional indemnity insurance limit.
The insurance limit is set out in the firm’s insurance policy and is fixed on the annual PII renewal; it is the maximum amount insurers will pay in any particular claim.
A liability cap is an agreement between a member and their client, fixed when they enter into a valuation engagement.
What 4 factors will the Court consider when deciding if a liability cap is reasonable?
The level of risk in the engagement.
The level of fees - there is no reason for the liability risk to be disproportionate to the reward.
The degree of sophistication and the relative bargaining position of the parties to the contract (i.e. lender = enforceable, consumer = not)
How effectively the cap is brought to the client’s attention – Terms of Engagement or Confirmation of Instructions is suitable, should not be ‘buried away’ in fine print
What is the common basis to negotiate a liability cap on for LSV purposes?
o The level of the liability cap can be negotiated on different bases - a percentage of the amount intended to be loaned (in the case of valuations for loan security purposes).
What approach does RICS advise if you are asked to allow a borrower to merely see the valuation report?
o Permitting third party reliance is different from merely permitting a third party to ‘see’ or to have ‘disclosed’ to them the valuation report as it does not automatically give rise to a legal duty to the third party. However, members should still take care even in allowing this, because there is a risk this might be construed as the same thing as permitting reliance. If members do agree, make it clear, in writing, that this is being permitted without assumption of any legal liability to that third party.
If you do permit 3rd party reliance, what 3 things should you ensure takes place?
the third party is bound by the terms and conditions of the firm’s contract with its client (including the liability cap)
the third party understands and acknowledges (if it is the case) that the firm has not conducted a fresh valuation and the effective date has not changed simply by the act of permitting third party reliance and
the purpose for which the valuation has been provided has not altered simply by permitting third party reliance.
If there is a panel agreement in place, what 3 things must you always consider in your agreement (from a risk perspective), and why?
1 The scope of the work
2 The fee
3 The liability cap
o Frequently, claims against valuers arise because of a mismatch between the work the valuer intended to do to prepare the valuation, and the work the client anticipated the valuer would do. The engagement letter is the valuer’s opportunity to ensure that the client’s expectations match those of the valuer as to what the valuer is going to do and, just as importantly, what the valuer is not going to do.
Why is it important to minimise negligence claims, even if you are not found to be negligent?
o Claims on a firm’s PII directly affect the cost and terms of insurance in the future. In practice, that means it is in the interests of the firm’s partners and senior staff to maintain an active involvement in risk management, so as to minimise claims under the policy. PII costs vastly more for LSV – liability caps significantly reduce your PII – litigious
What 3 things increase the liability risk when undertaking a commercial mortgage instruction?
more parties are permitted to rely on the valuation
the level of debt increases (particularly when the loan to value ratio increases) and
investment instruments such as bonds are issued and secured on the debt, particularly if those instruments are issued in public markets.
What is a bilateral loan, and why is it the least risk area of LSV?
A bilateral loan is the simple situation where one lender lends 100 per cent of a loan amount to one borrower. From a structural perspective, these are the least high risk secured lending valuation engagements for valuers. As there is only intended to be one lender client and the engagement is a relatively simple one, the instruction will in many cases be covered by an umbrella Service Agreement or other standardised documentation.
What is the English law principle re. assigning a contract to a 3rd party, and therefore what should you include in your engagement contract?
In general, as a matter of English law, the benefit to a client of the contract can be assigned by the client to a ‘third party’ (i.e. someone who is not already party to the contract), unless the contract expressly prohibits assignment.
However, this will not be possible if members include a clause in their terms of engagement by which they prohibit assignment of their engagement contract without their consent.
What are syndicated loans, and what should a valuer consider if instructed in this manner?
Syndicated loans are loans where there is a group or syndicate of lenders. This structure is usually used for higher value loans than bilateral loans (see above).
If providing a valuation for a syndicated loan, members should think about how to make sure all of the lenders are bound in to the terms of their engagement contract
When is mezzanine finance typically used,
Where does it get its name,
Why does it pose a higher liability risk to a valuer
And therefore what does the RICS recommend you do in such situations?
Mezzanine finance is used in situations where a higher Loan to Value (LTV) is required by the borrower or, for example, where the value of the project is expected to grow quickly such as development and refurbishment situations.
It gets its name because it is the middle layer of debt, falling between the secured ‘senior’ debt of a conventional lender, and the equity of the project owner.
Mezzanine finance is often provided quickly, with relatively little due diligence on the part of the lender. For a valuer, it is important to understand that:
• a mezzanine lender is usually the first lender to be exposed in the event that a project fails or a borrower defaults and
• a mezzanine lender lends against the security of the highest tranche of equity in the property that forms the security.
These factors mean that the liability risk for a valuer in advising mezzanine lenders about the value of a property is high. Members should ensure that their fee and liability cap reflect this level of risk.
What risks do crowdfunding and peer to peer lending agreements entail, and what therefore should a valuer ensure to do?
The risks can be similar to those for public offerings, because the valuer may not know who the investors are who wish to rely upon the valuation, and is unlikely to be able to agree contractual terms with each of them.
The arranger of the crowdfunding or peer to peer lending may be content for the valuation report to be provided to potential investors for their information only, on a ‘non-reliance’ basis, which will reduce the risk for the valuer.
If so, members should ensure that both their engagement letters and valuation reports make this basis clear.
What did Titan v Colliers CA 2015 establish re. whom the duty of care was owed in a securitised investment?
Significant: first English Court analysis of duty of care in a securitised investment.
Titan, as the issuer of the notes, brought a claim against Colliers for negligently over-valuing the property.
Commercial Court found that the issuer could bring the claim, that the valuer had indeed been negligent, and awarded damages to the issuer.
The Court of Appeal has now overturned that decision on the facts (within ‘the bracket’), but has confirmed the principle that an issuer (but not the noteholders i.e. by proxy ‘borrower’) may bring a claim in negligence against the valuer in the context of a CMBS structure.
What did Scullion v Bank of Scotland Plc establish re. a valuers duty of care to a borrower?
The claimant ‘S’ sought finance from a bank that engaged the defendant surveyors (Colleys) to provide the lender with a valuation and a prediction of the monthly rental income. S did not himself instruct an independent valuer. The rental prospects had been overstated and S was forced to sell the property, unable to meet the mortgage repayments. S sued the surveyor.
The case established the current legal position that a valuer appointed by a lender in a buy-to-let transaction will not owe a duty of care to the borrower, unless the valuer is appointed directly by the borrower or expressly permits the borrower to rely on the valuation.
Why do lender’s require a valuation report,
What will the valuation report be used for, and therefore what is the utility of the valuer’s role, and what 2 primary factors is the lender concerned with when measuring uncertainty?
o Lenders often do not have a detailed understanding of a particular property market or investment. The valuation report will normally be used to support work of internal underwriting teams, who conduct a very subjective process of risk analysis using detailed mathematical models. As measurement of this type of uncertainty is not conducive to a standardised approach, lenders do not usually seek third party advice.
o Valuers have a useful role to play in identification of investment uncertainties and provision of relevant data that lenders can use to measure and assess those uncertainties in their own way. A SWOT analysis is popular, as it is a relatively simple way to set out uncertainties in the context of both positive and negative investment factors.
o Emphasis is placed on uncertainties that will have biggest impact upon forecast cash flow and the borrower’s ability to service interest and capital payments on the loan.
Why do lenders often require particular special assumptions as part of an instruction?
o Cash flow analysis also has the advantage of allowing lenders to model possible ‘residual’ (or ‘exit’) value scenarios at the date of loan maturity, in order to assess probability of repayment of the outstanding loan balance (i.e. Vacant Possession value, or subject to 6 months marketing period).
How does a valuer’s approach to a property differ from a lender’s decision making process?
- Use of the ‘all risks’ yield (and this term may include the initial yield, the equivalent yield or the reversionary yield) is widely accepted for the purposes of analysing transaction evidence, but it may serve to mask some of the fundamental assumptions that lenders are making about properties.
- Income and capital growth assumptions, and their relationship with perceived levels of risk, are central to the lender’s decision-making process.
- All investment properties can be seen to carry an additional risk premium (compared to government bonds) because of their illiquid nature (i.e. the time and cost of individual transactions), which the lender will look to measure.
What are the 2 overall risks a lender typically focus on as part of their risk analysis?
o risk of the cash flow being insufficient to cover the interest payments; and
o risk of the residual value of the investment (at the maturity of the loan) being insufficient to be able to repay the outstanding balance of the loan.
How is risk defined/what does it measure from a lender’s perspective, and how does uncertainty therefore arise?
• Risk may be defined as the probability that an expected cash flow (or target rate of return) is not realised. In other words, risk is a measurement of the uncertainty in a cash flow and uncertainty arises from a lack of knowledge and information.
What 2 things will a lender seek to identify in their (explicit cash flow) risk analysis?
- Most lenders will develop specific risk management plans which are designed to remove, or at least mitigate, as many of these uncertainties as possible.
- The fundamental starting point is identification of these uncertainties and their parameters (i.e. by how much they can vary, attaching probabilities to these outcomes and protecting position through either funding a proportion of costs or careful drafting of loan agreement terms, for instance additional interest payments in year 2 (a ‘cash sweep’) if a tenant may not renew).
From a lender’s perspective, if a tenant was to vacate at lease expiry (within the loan term), what 2 figures/measures may be breached in the loan agreement,
and what 3 things will the lender look to measure the probability of?
- If the National Corporate tenant vacates the property at lease expiry, the interest cover ratio on the loan will fall to 1.25 in year 3, which will breach terms of the loan agreement. Moreover, it is likely (all other things being equal) that the Market Value of the property would fall to such an extent that the loan to value ratio would rise above 75%, possibly triggering a second breach of the loan agreement.
- The uncertainty of length of vacancy period, the extent of necessary refurbishment costs and probability of finding a good quality tenant at the anticipated rent and lease terms, are all issues that both investor and lender will try to measure.