LO3 - evaluations of theories Flashcards
Freud’s psychodynamic theory strengths
-can be used to explain all criminal behaviour
-can treat criminals through psychoanalysis
-has been used in development of social policies
Freud’s psychodynamic theory weaknesses
-cant measure the unconscious so its subjective
-the theory would predict that children without same sex parents are more likely to commit crimes which isn’t true
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory strengths
practical application - greater stability in childcare practises and longer visiting time with parents
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory weaknesses
-retrospective recall might be inaccurate as they’re asked to recall events that happened in childhood so memory may be affected
-may have investigator effects as he designed and conducted the interviews himself so may have researcher bias
SLT strengths
-scientific as Bandura’s study was a lab study to high internal validity
-explains criminal behaviour outside of genetic link
SLT weaknesses
-children may have been attracted to attacking the doll as that is its nature (hit it and it comes back up)
-opportunistic crimes can’t be explained by SLT as it has to be thought about
-too deterministic and ignores free will
Sutherlands differential association theory strengths
-explains why prisons are universities of crime
-explains high rate of re-offending
-can be applied to any type of crime
Sutherlands differential association theory weaknesses
-doesn’t explain why people who are exposed to criminality don’t commit crime
-focuses on petty crimes - ignores crimes such as WCC
-socially sensitive and could lead to stereotyping e.g if family are criminals they may be labelled
Eysenck’s personality theory strengths
-says the tendencies can be found in childhood which means we can prevent it
-offers practical measures for tackling criminality
Eysenck’s personality theory weaknesses
-got his results from a questionnaire meaning people could lie so its low in validity
-doesn’t clearly state what’s meant by psychopathy
-research doesnt support arguments for all 3 traits as offenders score high on psychoticism ands neuroticism but extroversion is mixed
-responses can vary depending on mood and peoples views can change over time
-unrepresentative sample - studied people with similar personalities
Lombroso’s atavistic form strengths
-most of the criminals he studied in prison had the characteristics
-made the study of criminality more scientific
-starting point of modern criminology
Lombroso’s atavistic form weaknesses
-ignores women
-not everyone with the features are criminals
-didnt compare his findings to non-criminals
Sheldon’s somatotypes strengths
-studied a large group size so generalisable
-Hartl et al found a mesomorphic rating of 5 out of the most seriously delinquent in his sample
Sheldon’s somatotypes weaknesses
-ignores women
-more than 3 body types
-not all mesomorphs are criminals
-body types may change
Twin studies strengths
-if MZ rate is higher than DZ then it proves that there is some cause of genetic