LN2 Interval Scheduling and Greedy alg Flashcards
What is the naive algorithm for the Interval Scheduling problem, and why is it impractical?
The naive algorithm examines all possible subsets of intervals to find the maximum set of non-overlapping intervals. It has a time complexity of O(n * 2^n) because there are 2^n possible subsets, making it impractical for large n due to exponential time growth.
What is a more efficient approach to solving the Interval Scheduling problem than the naive algorithm?
Develop a greedy algorithm that makes optimal local choices at each step, such as selecting the interval with the earliest end time, to build up an optimal global solution efficiently.
Why is selecting the interval with the earliest start time not an optimal strategy for Interval Scheduling?
Choosing intervals based on the earliest start time may result in selecting a long interval that overlaps with many others, potentially excluding shorter intervals that could collectively allow for more intervals to be scheduled without overlap.
Why does selecting the shortest interval not guarantee an optimal solution in Interval Scheduling?
Shortest intervals do not necessarily minimize overlap with other intervals. A short interval could still conflict with many other intervals, preventing the selection of a larger set of non-overlapping intervals.
Why might selecting the interval that overlaps the fewest other intervals fail to produce an optimal solution?
An interval that overlaps the fewest other intervals might still not be part of the optimal solution because its inclusion could prevent the selection of other intervals that collectively offer a larger total number of non-overlapping intervals.
What is the Earliest End First (EEF) algorithm for Interval Scheduling?
EEF is a greedy algorithm that sorts intervals by their end times and iteratively selects the interval with the earliest end time that does not overlap with previously selected intervals.
How does the EEF algorithm ensure that the selected intervals are non-overlapping?
By always choosing the next interval with the earliest end time that starts after the end time of the last selected interval, ensuring no intervals in the selection overlap.
What is the key idea behind the correctness proof of the EEF algorithm?
The exchange argument: showing that any optimal solution can be transformed into one that includes the interval with the earliest end time without decreasing the total number of intervals selected.
How does the exchange argument work in proving the EEF algorithm’s correctness?
If an optimal solution does not include the interval with the earliest end time, we can replace one of its intervals with this earliest-ending interval, maintaining optimality and moving closer to the EEF solution.
Why is the concept of “counterexamples” important in algorithm design and analysis?
Counterexamples help identify flaws in algorithms by providing specific instances where the algorithm fails, guiding the refinement of the algorithm or the development of a correctness proof.
What is the time complexity of the EEF algorithm, and why?
O(n log n), because sorting the intervals by end time takes O(n log n) time, and selecting intervals in a single pass takes O(n) time.
Why is it important to separate the problem-solving phase from implementation details in algorithm development?
Focusing first on solving the problem abstractly allows for the creation of a correct and efficient algorithm without being distracted by programming specifics, which can be addressed later.
What is a greedy algorithm?
A greedy algorithm makes the locally optimal choice at each step with the hope of finding a global optimum, often using a simple, problem-specific heuristic.
Why are greedy algorithms not always guaranteed to produce an optimal solution?
Because making the best local choice at each step does not necessarily lead to the best overall solution, especially in problems where future choices are affected by current decisions.
What is an exchange argument in the context of greedy algorithms?
An exchange argument is a technique used in correctness proofs where parts of an optimal solution are exchanged with choices made by the greedy algorithm to show that the greedy solution is also optimal.