Living Standards 1851-1886 Flashcards
To what extent did the living standards of the majority of the British people improve during the years 1851 to 1881?
how can standards of living be measured
-GDP (real wages)
Health- life expectancy, infant mortality, biometric data
etc, such as height and weight which were largely avaliable due to the army
Unemployment rates
Leisure, working rights etc
Why might you have expected living
standards to improve 1851-73?
Strong economy (1851-73) ‘Workshop of the World’
British GDP per capita in 1870 was $3,260, 20% higher
than the next wealthiest European country and 25% higher
than the USA.
Social reforms (BUT w/c v vulnerable- lack of safety net -
Poor Law)
any worker was ‘rarely more than a hair’s breadth removed from
the pauper’ (Hobsbawn).
how can you evaluate methods of measuring standards of living
-Neither real wages nor GDP per capita, for example, say
anything about the distribution or share of income and real wages do not benefit the unemployed at all.
-Secondly, the historical evidence available is fragmented, incomplete and sometimes absent, making conclusions probable rather than definitive.
-The statistical data on the numbers of the unemployed, for example, are incomplete and, whilst most workers experienced unemployment at some time, we do not know exactly when and for how long. Workers were often employed by the job (building workers), by the week or by
the day (dockers) and they would experience cyclical seasonal or frictional (the gap between changing jobs) unemployment.
-Rising real wages obviously had some impact on
the living standards of workers and this is evidenced by greater consumption but we remain unsure of the extent given we are unsure about the consistency of wages.
what was the british gdp per capita in 1870
and eval
British GDP per capita in 1870 was $3,260, 20% higher than the next wealthiest European country and 25% higher than the USA. This was, of course, consistent with the position of GB in the world. But it is a blunt measurement as it says nothing about the distribution of wealth in a profoundly unequal society.
what were the divisions within england and wat were the working class defines as
-statistics
divisions by class, higher, middle and working class
working class were not a homogenous group,
interclass divides between the skilled and unskilled
-Lloyd Jones- the true working class were those that laboured with their muscles for wages to maintain themselves
- working class made 80% of the population but only had 35.9% of total wealth in 1867
-4/5 of population earned living through manual labour
-industrial north vs agricultural south
what was the crofters war
- in scotland national identity and preservation of language was important , attempts made to anglicise gaeli speakers in 1872 through education act
-migration made those who spoke gaelic depopulated - gaelic speaking crofting families left behind during golden age of farming
-largely ignorant of new techniques
-rents became high under depression abd in 1882 crofters war broke out - highlighted economic unbalance between north vs south of scotland
-scottish north workers gad higher salaries
cities in scotland that prospered
- edinburgh- 3rd wealthiest
-glasgow - fifth wealthiest
prosperity in england due to the economy and workshop of the world- who benefitted
- profits of industry and capital went into overseas developments
-middle classes benefitted most
-could afford best quality furniture, domestic servants - built large houses in birmingham outskirts
-limited size of families through birth control, educated children privately
-viewed this rise in living standards as a reward for thriftiness and hard work
how did wages of the working classes increase
+eval (how much spent etc, ref historian)
- money wages rose by 50% from 1850-1875
-real wages increased by 1/3rd from 1875-1900 - historian Thomson, analysed earinibgs of farm labours in line with rises in wages, states that even at best their wages were no more than 20 shillings a week, could never be classed as anything but poor
-further, But workers spent 95% of their income on basic necessities whilst the upper classes spent only 65%.
what was the bank holiday act of 1871 and what was the working week like for the working classes
- legislation made provision for 4 statutory holidays a year
- the working week for workers declined from 65 hours/week in 1856 to 56 in 1873 and bank holidays and half day work on Saturdays gave workers more leisure time but they still worked 6 days of the week.
what did rising wages and falling prices mean for the working classes
(what could they buy)
refer to food
-simple commodities like soap and matches became more readily available
-transport costa halved so did the price of a loaf of bread
-prices of canned meats halved by 1900
-growth of nutritious & convenient fish & chips, sugar (price down by 58%),
why did living standards not improve for the poor
- rent
- money wage increases and division
-unemployed
- cotton workers and rural
- housing costs did not fall with prices; rent 1⁄4 to 1⁄2 of wages and housing poor with overcrowding
-Money wage increases was uneven – depended on type of W/C & economic circumstances e.g cotton workers unemployed by lack of cotton caused by US Civil war of1860s; rural wages rose from 1860 but dropped in Great Depression 1873- 1886.
-No stats avail for unemployed who don’t benefit from RWs nor for self-employed W/C income that supplemented wages (‘penny capitalism’).
what did statistics of the poor law show and how can this be evaluated
-booth research
-causes of poverty
-Official stats on Poor Law (PL) show decline in relief given (1m or 5.7% 1850 to 808k or 3% 1880).
-however the reduce in poor law can be accredited to views on outdoor relief, ‘ W/Cs avoided hated PL; poverty research by Booth et al 1886 estimated 30% of population lived in poverty.
-Causes? Unemploy, low wages, casual or temp wk, illness or old age. PL did not even touch problem.
-these categories of working class life had better lives than the very poor, the ‘submerged tenth’, but all of them feared joining them. The threat of unemployment combined with the hated poor law meant that any worker was ‘rarely more than a hairs breadth removed from the pauper’ (
what share of national income did industrial workers have
-Indust W/C only 2x share of national income in period but it had increased 4x
what statistics are there of paupers on relief in 1834-1880
in 1834 8.8% of the population were on relief vs
3% in 1880