Litigation within the EU Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the point of Article 258 infringement proceedings?

A

If the Commission finds the member state has failed to fulfill an obligation after an initial opinion of the Commission, it may bring the matter before the Court of Justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is the point of Article 258 infringement proceedings:
a. For citizens to achieve private redress? or
b. As a means of securing compliance with EU law?

A

It is b - a means of securing compliance with EU law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do citizen complaints fit into the Article 258 process?

A

Complaints by citizens are a significant source of information. A complaint form exists, which is reviewed by the Commission. The CoJ has forced the Commission to be more transparent in its handling of citizen complaints.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What control does an individual citizen acting as a complainant have over Art 258 proceedings?

A

They have no say in whether the matter moves forward, as these proceedings are not designed for individual redress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Are Art 258 proceedings private or public?

A

They are kept private to limit the embarrassment to member states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Does the Commission have discretion on whether to bring Article 258 proceedings?

A

Yes. It cannot be forced to bring them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Star Fruit v Commission

A

A case brought by an external third party to try and force the Commission in initiate Art 258 proceedings. They were not successful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Commission v Greece

A

The Court of Justice determined the Commission’s reasons for bringing Art 258 proceedings are immaterial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Commission v United Kingdom (Open Skies) (Case C-466/98)

A

UK was displeased that the Commission appeared to be initiating Art 258 proceedings simply to jump start climate action-related talks. Court of Justice didn’t care/said they can bring a 258 proceeding for whatever reason they want.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Commission v Germany [1995]

A

The Court ruled the Commission doesn’t have to demonstrate a reason for bringing Article 258 proceedings but when they do so can be subject to restriction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Commission v Netherlands [1991]

A

Delays in bringing Art 258 proceedings could infringe on the Member State’s right to a defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Commission v Ireland [1984]

A

If the Commission brings action too quickly before a Member State has a chance to respond, that can be an issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the role of the reasoned opinion in Art 258 proceedings?

A
  1. It is the official means by which the Commission is communicating the substance of the complaint against the Member State.
  2. It provides a member state with protection, as there must be reasoning in the opinion.
  3. It specifies the time period in which the vioation must be remedied.
  4. It provides the Member State with a clear statement of the case against it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Commission v Italy 1961

A

Article 258 proceedings can be used to address lack of reasoning in a Commission’s reasoned opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does the complaint against the Member State in an Art 258 proceeding have to remain exactly the same from reasoned opinion to court action?

A

No, but the essence of the complaint must remain the same across all documentation actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does the Commission have to grant access to reasoned opinions?

A

No, but it sometimes publishes them.

17
Q

What is an Art 267 preliminary reference procedure?

A

The Court of Justice gives preliminary rulings re:
1. Interpretation of the Treaties
2. Validity and Interpretation of the Acts of the EU Institutions

Member States can choose to request these. If there is no judicial remedy (appeal) available under national law they are required to ask for it.

18
Q

What are the criteria for a Member State judicial body to be considered a court/tribunal for Art 267 purposes?

A
  1. It is established to be so by EU law
  2. It is permanent
  3. its jurisdiction is compulsory
  4. Its procedure is inter partes
  5. It applies the rule of law
  6. It is independent
19
Q

Can a court refer any issue to the ECJ? Does the court have to hear it?

A

No - it must be an issue of EU law. No, the Court gets to choose whether it is necessary to issue a ruling.

20
Q

Are there exceptions to the obligation for the courts of last instance in a member state to refer for a preliminary ruling?

A

Yes:
1. If a previous ruling in a similar case/proceedings has been issued and can applu
2. Even if there wasn’t a prior ruling but the answer is obvious (Acte Clair)

21
Q

Can the ECJ delcare a national law invalid in Art 267 proceedings?

A

No

22
Q

Can a national court declare an EU law invalid?

A

No

23
Q

Foglia v Novello

A

The ECJ does not entertain contrived disputes.

24
Q

Gaspirini

A

The ECJ does not have to entertain hypothetical cases. (It still may on occasion, such as the Whiteman case re: the UK withdrawing from the EU/Art 50 proceedings)

25
Q

Bacardi - Martini

A

The ECJ will not hear a case if the questions in the case are not clearly articulated.

26
Q

Telemaroicabruzzo

A

The ECJ will not hear a case if the facts int he case are insufficiently clear. (The ECJ generally wants a facts matrix before it hears a case.)