Linking Pension Liabilities to Asset Flashcards
a contrast the assumptions concerning pension liability risk in asset-only and liability-relative approaches to asset allocation; b discuss the fundamental and economic exposures of pension liabilities and identify asset types that mimic these liability exposures; c compare pension portfolios built from a traditional asset-only perspective to portfolios designed relative to liabilities and discuss why corporations may choose not to implement fully the liability mimicking portfolio."
a contrast the assumptions concerning pension liability risk in asset-only and liability-relative approaches to asset allocation;
Asset only takes no consideration of the liabilities and assumes these liabilities are not exposed to market related risk. However they are and go unrewareded in an asset only approach.
Pg 456 table
Exposures of Pension liabiltiies
Market Related
Non market related
Easy to understand by diving the plan participants in demographic groups
Market Related
- Inactive Participants
Who? Currently receiving the pension plan benefits or who have left the firm but have not yet started receiving the benefits.
Fixed Payment except if it is inflation linked.
Exposure: Term structure
Mimic Portfolio: Nominal Bond portfolio/ Real and nominal bonds (incase the liability is inflation linked)/ inflation linked bonds (one for one inflation indexation.
2. Active Participants Who? Current employees Two benefits Exposure: Term structure Accrued: Past services and wages earned Fixed payment except if linked to inflation Mimic Portfolio: Nominal Bonds
b.Future: Future services and wages
- Future wages
Exposure: Inflation Growth and Term Structure- Future wage liability - accrued benefit liability + Future wage liability
Two components - future inflation –> Real bonds till until retirement and nominal bonds after retirement
real wage growth–> Equities + Nominal bonds
- Future Services - linked to wage growth. However this is not considered in the funding target and hence should be excluded from investment benchmark
C. Future Participants:
Rarely considered and hence not to be included
Non market related exposures
uncertainity related to non-market exposure is termed as Liability Noise
Two components
- plan demographic experience differing from actuary’s model given that the underlying probabilities are certain
- model uncertainity - underlying probabilities are uncertain
Inactive Participants:
a. Retirees:
- Mortality rate - living longer than expected more benfits or vice versa
- difficult to hedge
b. Deferred’s
- when will retire and start receiving benefits
Active Participants:
withdrawal, disability, retirement - large uncertain - larger liability noise - less hedge able
Linking Assets and Liabilities via fundamental factors
Economic and Fundamental Factos: Real risk free return, Rate of inflation Risk premium Rate of growth
Steps for modelling
Step 1:
Determine the factors involved
Real risk free return - Tbill minus inflation proxy
Rate of inflation change in consumer price index
Risk premium - historical analysis with forward looking estimates
Rate of growth - relation of overall economy and stock market
Step 2: Setting Asset and Liabilities Sensitivities
See page 465-467
Desgining Investment Policy Relative to liabilities
- Liability mimicking portfolio - low investment risk
- not provide the expected return and hence future service benefits and future participants are defeased by cash contributions
- should be used only a way to measure
Other solutions to minimise the unrewarded risk versus liabilities
Hedge the liability
Focus the remaining capital on efficient return generation
Traditional V liability approach
The traditional approach typically leads to 60%–70% equities with the remainder in short and immediate duration nominal bonds. The liability relative approach, on the other hand, leads to investing in long duration nominal bonds, real rate bonds, equities and derivatives to hedge the liability, with the remainder invested in well-diversified return focused component.”