Limitation Flashcards
When does time stop running?
When the claim is ‘brought.’
What are examples of “breach” in contract?
- Non-payment of price: time runs from contractual date for payment.
- Breach of implied term as to quality: time runs from delivery.
When is a claim ‘brought’?
The date the CF is sealed by court.
Posted CFs will be date stamped.
What else must be delivered to court?
The issue fee.
When will time not run?
When the C is under a legal disability. Eg: children; mental disability.
From where will a cause of action in respect of personal injuries arise?
Nuisance, negligence, breach of statutory/contractual duty.
Where will section 11 re personal injuries not apply?
Actions brought for damages under Protection of Harassment Act.
When can action under the fatal accidents act not be brought?
If the death occurred when the person injured could no longer maintain an action and recover damages in respect of the injury.
What is the consequence of a person disbarred under section 11 of LA 1980 then dying?
No account shall be taken of the possibility of that time limit being overridden under section 33.
What is the time limit in respect of the fatal accidents act? And when does it start from?
- Three years
- From either the date of death, or the date of knowledge of the person for whose benefit the action is brought, whichever is the later.
What if there are different dependents claiming under the fatal accidents act?
If the dates of knowledge differ, the date of knowledge from which the limitation period is to be calculated must be applied separately to each of them.
What is a reference to the date of knowledge?
A reference to the date on which they first had knowledge of one of the relevant facts (see later question).
What factors are relevant to the date of knowledge?
Are they cumulative or disjunctive?
Date on which they had knowledge that:
- The injury in question was significant
- The injury was attributable in whole or in part to the act or omission which is alleged to constitute negligence, nuisance or breach of duty
- The identity of the defendant
- If it is alleged that the act or omission was that of a person other than the defendant, the identity of that person and the additional facts supporting the bringing of an action against the defendant.
The factors are cumulative.
What is to be made of the knowledge of negligence etc as matters of law?
Knowledge that any acts or omissions did or did not as a matter of law involve negligence, nuisance and breach of duty is irrelevant.
When is an injury ‘significant’?
If the person:
i) whose state of knowledge is in question
ii) would reasonably have considered it sufficiently serious
iii) to justify his instituting proceedings for damages
iv) against a defendant who did not dispute liability and was able to satisfy a judgement.
What does a person’s ‘knowledge’ include the purposes of the Limitation act?
What type of knowledge is this?
Knowledge which he might reasonably have been expected to require:
a) from facts ascertainable or observable by him, or
b) from facts ascertainable by him with the help of medical or other appropriate expert advice which it is reasonable for him to seek.
Constructive knowledge.
As regards constructive knowledge, when will a person not be fixed with knowledge of facts? What is the condition?
So long as he has taken all reasonable steps to obtain, and where appropriate, to act on, that advice.