lifespan perspective and socioemotional ageing Flashcards
negative perceptions of aging - are they reality?
memory loss, inability to drive, serious illness, lonely, financial issues, lack of social life
reality is much better than predicted by under 65s when compared with reality for over 65s
issues exist but not as common as predicted
stereotype threat effect and example with old people
ironic effect of underperformance on a stereotype-relevant task due to the anxiety felt about confirming negative stereotypes
when told intelligence declines with age, old people perform worse on IQ tests (meta-analysis of data)
why study aging (5)
full picture of development - not just early years - physically and psychologically
reduced stereotypes of “aging = negative”
can improve autonomy and wellbeing in older age
adjust environment to accommodate changes later in life - tools to assist older people and improve their lives
reduce number of negative consequences of not taking care of yourself associated with age → therefore less pressure on health services etc
stereotypes around old people and health conditions study - 2 variables for correlation
Baltimore Longitudinal study of aging
survey asked about attitudes towards old people with yes/no questions
measured number of cardiovascular issues (e.g. stroke)
* controlled for: age, BMI, chronic conditions etc. (which could contribute to likelihood of having cardiovascular health event)
* negative stereotypes = more likely to have cardiovascular health issue
measured hippocampal volume
* people with positive age stereotypes were less likely to have steep decline in hippocampal volume than those with negative age stereotypes
shows impact of internalising these stereotypes
aging demographic of the world - 1990, 2011, 2050 predictions
increase in over 60s:
9.2% in 1990
11.7% in 2013
predicted 21.1% in 2050
therefore 2 billion over 60s by 2050
lifespan perspective of development
broad perspective, embraces complexities, embodies all subdisciplines - diversity of experiences
* doesn’t fall into the issue other subdisciplines have with only focussing on one of these and ignoring other elements
* not one-size-fits-all
7 characteristics of lifespan perspective
- development as a life-long process
- multi-directionality
- development as gain and loss
- plasticity
- historical embeddedness
- contextualism as a paradigm
- multidisciplinary
characteristic of lifespan perspective: development as a lifelong process
no age period holds supremacy in regulating nature of development - not just children
both continuous (cumulative) and discontinuous (innovative) processes work at all stages
diverse change patterns that differ in timing (onset, duration, termination), direction, and order
characteristic of lifespan perspective: multi-directionality
diversity/pluralism in directionality of ontogenetic change
* direction of change depends on behaviour
in one developmental phase, systems of behaviour show increases whilst others decrease
mechanics of intelligence
* basic architecture of info processing and problem solving
* basic cognitive operations and structures associated with tasks
pragmatics of intelligence
* content and knowledge-related application of mechanics of intelligence
* general systems = factual and procedural knowledge - crystalised intelligence
* specialised systems = e.g. occupational expertise
* knowledge of performance or skills for activation of intelligence in specific contexts
characteristic of lifespan perspective: development as loss and gain- SOC framework
both growth and decline occurs with age - not all bad - more growth earlier than later
e.g. loss of not being able to drive doesn’t limit their ability to get around - use of public transport instead
- gerontology views aging as decline → limited view, mainly biological
- development is any change - any direction
- progression at same time as decline - no change is pure gain
- SOC - selectivity, optimisation and compensation framework - dynamics between gain and loss (especially in successful aging)
characteristic of lifespan perspective: plasticity - with 3 aspects
intraindividual plasticity in development
depends on life conditions and experiences
3 aspects of plasticity:
baseline performance = initial level of performance without intervention or special treatment (e.g., 5k run speed)
baseline reserve capacity = upper range of performance potential - when all available resources are used to optimize performance (e.g., 5k run speed with special trainers?)
developmental reserve capacity = strengthen baseline reserve capacity through intervention or development (e.g., 5k run speed after weeks of personal training)
distinction between these 3 is important - could just be out of practice - could achieve it with intervention
characteristic of lifespan perspective: historical embeddedness
ontogenetic development varies with historical-cultural contexts
* e.g. health care differences, education access
development is influenced socio-culturally within a specific time period and how they evolve over time - doesn’t occur in a vacuum
single cohort observations cannot tell all about aging
characteristic of lifespan perspective: contextualism as a paradigm - 3 factors
individual development is affected by complex interaction between:
age-graded influences
* correlated with age and predict their sequence
* biological maturation and age-graded socialisation e.g. puberty, menopause
* could include factors like marriage and retirement which often happen in an order with age - not just biological
history-graded/normative influences
* historical time an biocultural context in which individuals develop - applicable to many people in a group
* long term change functions e.g. toward modernity
* time-specific e.g. war, COVID pandemic
nonnormative influences
* not applicable to many people (more individual), don’t follow general predictable course
* e.g. refugees experience, effect of winning the lottery
characteristic of lifespan perspective: multidisciplinary
interdisciplinary - anthropology, biology, and sociology with psychology
purist psychological view is incomplete
integration of knowledge vs separatist differentiation of disciplinary knowledge
socioemotional processing - changes in social networks with age
size decreases with age
social pruning begins in 30-50s
older people show a preference for familiar and emotionally close partners = quality over quantity