Life after the death - personal identity and death Flashcards
John Hick’s replica theory
At death both the body and soul die. Hick argues that given certain circumstances, it would be possible that the dead could exist after death as themselves, if an exact replica were to appear. This replica would be the same as the person who died, according to Hick the same person. This replica will be complete with the same characteristics and memories. Death destroys us but God recreates us.
The problem pf personal identity and a replica body - not the same person
Replica is not the original and therefore the individual has not survived death. An art expert would not be prepared to pay millions of pounds for a replica painting of the Mona Lisa.
Problem of personal identity - not the same ‘I’
Even if others recognise me in my ‘new body’ and I have the same memories as before I died, many philosophers do not accept that a replica body is still the same ‘I’ that died.
Hick and John Smith
John Smith lived in the US, one day his disappeared, a replica Smith appeared in India, according to Hick, this Smith ‘is exactly similar in both physical and mental characteristics to the person who disappeared’. Hick continued by supposing that Smith died, God recreated him in the next world and he was the same.
Immortality of the soul - dualist approach
The mind determines our personality and that the body is an outer shell to house the mind/soul. The body is destined for decay but the mind, associated with higher values such as truth and goodness is immortal. If an individual spends life in contemplation of these higher realities then the soul can enter eternity.
Immortality of the soul - Descartes
When an individual dies, their soul can continue to exist with God, as the same individual that existed in a physical form on earth.
Descartes quote on immortality of the soul
“Our soul is of nature entirely independent of the body, and consequently is not bound to die with it”.
Personal identity and an immortal soul - challenges to dualism - Bernard Williams
Is our identity only the result of actions and memories in the mind? If we get a new body then does this have no influence on how we behave? Bernard Williams rejected this conclusion. He argued that memories are not a good guide to identity. Memories can be fabricated so identity cannot be proved through this. He believed that identity came from physical characteristics as well.
Personal identity and the immortal soul - challenges to dualism - Modern science
Modern science has shown links between mind and brain so how can the mind survive on its own? surgeons can split the brain and create ‘two minds’. The mind appears to be causally dependent on the brain.
‘Sameness of consciousness’ - John Locke
He thought that personal identity consisted neither in sameness of body nor in sameness of soul, but rather in what he called ‘sameness of consciousness’. He claimed that consciousness is enclosed in spiritual substance. An individual should remember enough of their past consciousnesses, and it is this awareness of self in different places that makes personal identity.
Locke’s example of the soul of a prince
Soul of a prince is transferred to into the body of cobbler whose soul has departed. The prince still has princely thoughts and his personal identity as prince, even though his body is different. Therefore according to Locke, he is still the prince even though ‘he would be the same cobbler to everyone besides himself’.
Scientific theories of consciousness - Penrose
There is a non-algorithmic element to human thought and human consciousness because humans are capable of independent thought. Penrose claims that this is quantum effects in the brain that are the source of our consciousness. He concludes that consciousness is not the product of direct brain activity.
The possibility of disembodied existence - Price’s dream world
Price compares the world in which the disembodied soul lives to a dream world. As a dream takes place within its own space and not reality so the soul would have its own space thats not within the physical world. Also just as dreams take place in the mind so the soul in the afterlife would be mind independent.
What point is HH Price making with his ‘dream world’?
The experiences in the after life are similar to dreams where we have experiences and are able to perform actions with our dream bodies. In this world we would communicate with other souls through telepathy.
Criticism of Price’s dream world?
Hick points out that if in this disembodied existence our desires are to be fulfilled then tension is going to result from conflicting desires. For example if I wish to have dinner with Elvis in heaven this evening but Elvis has a desire to perform a concert this evening, which dream world would we inhabit?