Liability Issues Flashcards
vicarious liability
D commits a tort against P and a 3P is held liable due to his relationship with D
respondeat superior
employers are liable for torts committed by employees within the scope of their employment
Intentional torts usually outside of scope unless:
1. The job requires use of force (eg bouncers)
2. The job entails creating friction (eg bail bondsman), or
3. Intentional tort done to further employer’s goals (eg physically breaking up a fight in a store)
independent contractors
employers are generally NOT liable for torts committed by independent contracts EXCEPT act inherently dangerous or for non-delegable duties
EX: business holds property open to public must keep premises safe (non-delegable)
partnership
each partner is vicariously liable for any other partner’s torts committed within the scope of the partnership
parent-child
parents are NOT liable for children’s torts UNLESS helped facilitate it
BUT can be negligent if reason to know of child’s propensity to injure
tavernkeepers
business serving alcohol may be liable for injuries caused by intoxicated patron if negligently served patron
Usually depends on wording of state’s “dram-shop” statute
joint and several liability
arises if the acts of two or more Ds combine to produce a single indivisible injury (including acting in concert)
each liable for full harm
P recovers** fully** from only one D
contribution
D who pays more than her share of damages under joint and several liability can get excess costs back from other Ds
NOT applicable for intentional tort liability
usually imposed proportionally
indemnity
involves shifting the entire loss between or amongst Ds
Available by
1. contract
2. vicarious liability
3. strict products liability