Liabilities Flashcards

1
Q

310(1) of the crimes act 1961

A

Conspiracy - (P=7yrs) - Conspires - with any person - to commit any offence.

Case law: Mulcahy v R - R v Sanders - R v White -Churchill v Walton.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

198(2)(a) of the crimes act 1961

A

Discharges a firearm with intent to injure - (P=7yrs) - with intent to injure any person OR with reckless disregard for the safety of others - discharges any firearm OR air gun OR similar weapon - at any person.

R v Mohan - R v Waaka - R v Donovan - R v Chanfook - R v Harney - R v Pekepo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

6(f)(c),(d) or (e) misuse of drugs 1975

A

Possession of controlled drugs for purpose - (P=life/14/8yrs) - Has in his possession - of any controlled drug - for any of the purposes set out in paragraphs (c), (d), or (e).

police v emerali - R v strawbridge - warner v MPC - sullivan v Earl of Caithness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

240(1)(a) crimes act 1961

A

obtain by deception - (P=7/1yrs/3mths) - By any deception - and with out claim of right - obtains ownership or possession of or control over any property OR any privilege OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR benefit OR valuable consideration.

R v morley - R v laverty - warner v MPC - sullivan v earl of caithness - R v cara - hayes v R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

228(b) crimes act 1961

A

uses/attempts to use a document - (P=7yrs) - with intent to obtain any property OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR valuable consideration - dishonestly - and without claim of right - uses OR attempts to use any document.

R v mohan - R v waaka - R v morley - R v cara - hayes v R - R v misic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

228(a) crimes act 1961

A

taking/attempts to use a document - (P=7yrs) - with intent to obtain any property OR service OR pecuniary advantage OR valuable consideration - dishonestly - and without claim of right - takes OR obtains a document.

R v mohan - R v waaka - R v cara - hayes v R - R v misic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

246(1) crimes act 1961

A

Receiving - (P=7/1yrs/3mths) - receives - any property - stolen OR obtained by any other imprisonable offence - knowing that property to have been stolen or so obtained OR being reckless as to whether or not the property has been stolen or so obtained.

warner v MPC - sullivan v earl of caithness - R v donnelly - R v lucinsky - sb:pcl - R v kennedy - R harney.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

6(1)(e) misuse of drugs act 1975

A

sell/offer to sell class c controlled drug to a person of or over 18 years - (P=8yrs) - sells OR offers to sell - class c controlled drug - to a person of or over 18 years of age.

R v during - R v brown - R v strawbridge - R v emerali - R v forrest & forrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

6(1)(b) misuse of drugs act 1975

A

Produce/manufacture controlled drug - (P=life/14/8yrs) - produce OR manufacture - any controlled drug.

R v rua - R v strawbridge - police v emerali.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

6(1)(a) misuse of drugs act 1975

A

imports/exports controlled drug - (P=life/14/8yrs) - imports OR exports - any controlled drug - into New Zealand OR out of New Zealand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

6(1)(c) misuses of drugs act 1975

A

supply administer/offer to supply or administer class a/b controlled drug - (P=life/14yrs) - supplies OR administers OR offers to supply or administer OR otherwise deals - class a/b controlled drug - to any person.

R v maginnis - R v donald - R v knox - black laws dictionary - R v during - R v brown - R v strawbridge - police v emerali.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

6(1)(d) misuse of drugs act 1975

A

supply class c controlled drug to person under 18 years - (P=8yrs) - supplies OR administers OR otherwise deals - class c controlled drug - to person under 18 years of age.

R v maginnis - R v donald - R v knox - blacklaw’s dictionary - R v strawbridge - R v forrest & forrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

198(1)(a) crimes act 1961

A

discharges a firearm with intent to do GBH - (P=14yrs) - with intent to do GBH - discharges any firearm OR airgun OR similar weapon - at any person.

R v mohan - R v waaka - DPP v smith - R v pekepo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

198(1)(b) crimes act 1961

A

doing dangerous act with intent - (P=14yrs) - with intent to cause GBH - send or delivers to any person OR puts in any place - any explosive OR injurious substance or device.

R v mohan - R v waaka - DPP v smith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

198(1)(c) crimes act 1961

A

doing dangerous act with intent - (P=14yrs) - with intent to cause GBH - sets fire - to any property.

R v mohan - R v waaka - DPP v smith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

198A(1) crimes act 1961

A

uses firearm against law enforcement officer ect… - (P=14yrs) uses any firearm in any manner whatever - against any constable, acting in the course of his or her duty - knowing that the person is a constable so acting OR being reckless to whether or not that person is a constable so acting.

police v parker - simester & brookbank - R v harney.

17
Q

198A(2) crimes act 1961

A

uses a firearm with intent to resist ect.. - (P=10yrs) - usesd any firearm in any manner whatever - with intent to resist the lawful arrest or detention of himself OR any other person.

police v parker - R v swain - R v mohan - R v waaka - fisher v R.

18
Q

198B(1)(a) crimes act 1961

A

commission of crime with firearm - (P=10yrs) in committing any imprisonable offence - uses any firearm.

19
Q

198B(1)(b) crimes act 1961

A

commission of crime with firearm - (P=10yrs) - while committing any imprisonable offence - has any firearm with him or her in circumstances that prima facie show an intention to use it in connection with that imprisonable offence.

R v kelt - tuli v police - R v mohan - R v waaka.