Levine et al. (2001) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the 3 main aims of Levine’s study?

A
  • See if helping of strangers varies across cultures
  • Identify the characteristics of those communities in which strangers are more/less likely to help
  • See if the tendency for people to help depends on the situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many countries were used in Levine’s study?

A

23 countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who were the participants in Levine’s study?

A

Pedestrians walking past the confederates during helping situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the three helping situations which Levine created in each country?

A
  • Dropped pen
  • Hurt leg and drop magazines
  • Blind person about to cross a busy street
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the ‘dropped pen’ condition and how it was performed.

A
  • Confederates walked at moderate pace (1.5 paces/second)
  • When near pedestrian, confederate would accidentally drop pen
  • Total of 214 men and 210 women approached
  • Participants recorded as having helped if they picked up pen or called confederate to let them know
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the ‘hurt leg’ condition and how it was performed.

A
  • Confederate walked with a heavy limp and a leg brace
  • Confederate drops magazine and appears to struggle to pick them up when near a pedestrian
  • 253 men and 240 women approached
  • Participant recorded as having helped if they offered to help or began to help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the ‘blind person’ condition and how it was performed.

A
  • Confederates with dark glasses to pretend to be blind stand at pedestrian crossing with traffic lights
  • Confederate would wait until just before the lights turns green, held their cane out and waited for assistance
  • 281 trials conducted
  • Participants recorded as having helped if, at a minimum, they informed the confederate the light was green
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the most and least helpful country and what average percentage of help did they have?

A
  • Most helpful - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - 93.33% help

- Least helpful - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia - 40.33% help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the only significant relationship between?

A

Countries Purchasing Power and overall levels of helping (cities with lower purchasing power help more)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is meant by purchasing power?

A

The economic well-being of a country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Was there a relationship found between gender and helping behaviour?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is mean by the term simpatia?

A

Being friendly, nice, agreeable and good-natured is prioritised over achievement and productivity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Levine find about helping behaviour and simpatia?

A

Countries with simpatia were much more helpful than countries without.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the main conclusions of Levine’s study?

A
  • Overall levels of helping across cultures are inversely related to a countries economic productivity.
  • Countries with simpatia are more likely to help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly