Level Three - Example Two (Croydon) Flashcards

1
Q

What was your marketing strategy that you recommended?

A

discuss with client what their target was and how that aligned with our opinion. - different fit outs - do we want to refurb etc?
if in strong location - requirements list
targeted marketing to specific retailers
linkedIn post and pipnet etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did you assess the covenant?

A

Creditsafe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are you qualified to advise on covenant strength?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What considerations led to your client accepting the offer at the quoting rent rather than the higher offer?

A

Although one offer was above the quoting rent, the company making the offer was newly formed, which presented a higher risk. The second offer came from an established company with experience in the area and a longer-term lease commitment, which aligned with my client’s objective of securing a reliable tenant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How would you handle a situation where a client prefers a high-risk offer against your recommendation?

A

TBC - their choice no matter what, but my responsibility to make them aware of riskiness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In the Croydon subletting case, how did you determine the marketing strategy to attract long-term tenants?

A

Given the client’s objective of securing a long-term tenant, I focused on reaching well-established businesses that had a proven track record of stability. This included targeting retailers already operating in the area but seeking to expand. I used online platforms alongside local networks to ensure the property was marketed to suitable candidates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

You said you selected a more established company over a newly formed company, what are the downsides of a lease being taken by a new company?

A
  • No financial performance
  • Risk of tenant failure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can you do to mitigate the risk from a new company?

A
  • Rent deposits / guarantors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did you assess the two tenant covenants?

A

Local covenant - creditsafe.
New company - rent deposit etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why did you recommend a sub-lease over an assignment?

A

The passing rent was much higher than what would be achievable. Rent was 53k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the benefit of a longer lease to your client?

A
  • Guaranteed income for a longer period of time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why was the passing rent not achieveable?

A

When they took on the unit, it was a proper high street, only buses go down there now. I was fairly certain that rents would not go back to where they were. This was the only interest we could get.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly