Level 2 Accounting Flashcards
ACS 718
Equity Treatment
- Awards that pay out in stock receive equity treatment
- Expense is determined at grant date
ASC 718
Liability treatment
- Awards that pay out in cash receive liability treatment
- Expense for grants that receive liability treatment is not determined until the grant is settled
- Fluctuations in fair value before settlement increase or decrease expense recognized
- Cumulative catch up each period (as if the fair value had always been current fair value)
- stock-based compensation that is settled in a fixed amount of dollars is usually classified as a liability
ASC 718
Events Triggering Liability Accounting Treatment
Liability treatment applies to grants that the company can be required to settle in cash upon the occurrence of events outside the company’s control as well as the election of the award holder.
Where the triggering event is “outside the control of the award holder, liability accounting is not required until the triggering event becomes likely to occur”
ASC 718
Cash Settlement
- Fair value re-estimated each period, expense trued up
- Exercise, cancellation or expiration, where final expense of liability awards is adjusted to settlement date intrinsic value
- Expires unexercised = expense reversed
ASC 718
For the measurement date to occur, the following must be true
- Company and award recipient have a mutual understanding of the award’s key terms and conditions.
- The company is contingently obligated to issue award or transfer assets to an award recipient who renders the requisite service.
- Required approvals for the grant have been obtained.
- Award recipient begins to be affected by subsequent changes in the price of the company’s shares.
- Communication of the terms of the award must be made within a reasonable time of the grant date.
ASC 718
Measurement Date for cash-settled awards
Settlement Date
ASC 718-10-25
Clarifies that a mutural understanding is presumed to exist on the date the board of directors approves the grant, provided that the following two conditions are met:
1. Grant is unilateral, and the award recepiant does not have the ability to negotiate terms and contitions
2. Grant is expected to be communicated to the award recipient in a “relitvily short timeframe”
ASC 718 Preferred Pricing/Valuation Model
There is no specific pricing model identified or even a strong preference stated, so that means that companies have a variety of different options pricing models that they can choose from.
ASC 718
Black Scholes Merton, “BSM” model inputs:
- Exercise price
- Fair market value of underlying stock
- Expected term of option
- Expected volatility of underlying stock
- Expected dividend yield on underlying stock
- Risk-free interest rate
Black Scholes Merton, “BSM” model inputs:
Expected term
The length of time option holders are anticipated to wait before exercising their options and is typically shorter than the contractual term because most employees exercise long before their options are due to expire.
Also called “Expected Life”
Black Scholes Merton, “BSM” model inputs
Expected Volatility
Over a period of time equal to the expected term the company will measure the annual fluctuation of the stock price that is expected. This can be based on historical fluctuation, but if expectations for the future are different for some reason, this measure should be adjusted.
For purposes of understanding this factor, higher volatility increases the estimated fair value of the options.
Black Scholes Merton, “BSM” model inputs
Expected dividend yield
If company offers dividends, but options don’t come with dividend rights, then those dividends decrease the value of the options.
Black Scholes Merton, “BSM” model inputs
Risk-free Interest Rate
This is the rate currently available on zero-coupon U.S. government issues that have a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option.
However, because these aren’t usually freely available to the public, most companies use the Treasury rate with a term equal to option’s expected term, which available on the US Treasury website.
Preferred Pricing Model for Full Value Awards
use simple intrinsic value.
=Grant date fair market - less the exercise price if any.
Preferred Pricing Model for Market -Based Awards
Monte Carlo simulation.
Lattice Option Pricing Model
the term does not refer to a specific model but to a type of a model, basiclly a tree of outcomes.
Much more complicated than the BSM and may allow for, not only the minimum inputs required, but multiple inputs.
The model takes your grant from grant date to expiration date and breaks that time down into smaller intervals and within each interval that it breaks your grant down into, it calculates the probability of the exercise that may occur.
Binomial Lattice Model
Assumes your stock price is going to go up or down.
Trinomial Lattice Model
Assume the stock price is going to go up, down, or remain flat.
Lattice models also generally have two additional assumptions outside of the minimum required six factors
- the Sub-optimal exercise factor
- the post-vesting termination rate
Valuation of Stock Options
Calculating “Expected Term” Under ASC 718 using the SAB 107 simplified method
- If company cannot rely on historical data (insufficient or irrelevant)
- Average of the vesting term and contractual term of the option
Requirements for SAB 107 Simplified Method (SM)
- Option must be “plain vanilla”
- Service-based
- At-the-money and strike price equals market value
- Unvested shares are forfeited at termination
- Vested shares only exercisable for a “short period” after termination
SAB 110 restrictions on Simplified Method (SAB 107)
- Requires careful justification for using Simplified Method
- Financial statement disclosure of reasons for using Simplified Method
- Simplified Method is prohibited where there is sufficient historical data
Expected Term
ASU 2018-07
- Brought accounting for non-employees under ASC 718
- To value nonemployees grants, private companies can use the contractual term
- Not clear that simplified method can be used for non-employee options
ASC 718 – Service Periods
ASC 718 – Explicit Service Periods
- Time-based awards
- The stated vesting period of the award (e.g. time-based, 33% annually over 3 years, monthly over 4 years).
ASC 718 – Service Periods
ASC 718 – Implicit Service Periods
- For performance-based awards (vesting contingent on goals not related to stock price)
- Period between the grant date and the expected vest date.
-ASC 718 – Derived Service Periods
- For market-based awards (vesting is contingent on goals related to the stock price)
- Service period is computed via a sophisticated option pricing model. (e.g. When stock price increases by 20%, output of a model like Monte-Carlo Simulation).
Recognition of Expense for Cliff-Vesting Awards
- Full vest on a single date
- Expense accrued on a straight-line basis
Recognition of Expense for Graded Vesting Awards
- Example: Monthly, Quarterly, Yearly Vesting, combo
- ASC 718 Permits two alternative methods for time-basedawards:
1. Straight line
2. Accelerated Attribution (FIN28)
Recognition of Expense for for time based awards using Straight Line basis
Over full-service period provided the amount of expense recorded at any point is proportionate to the percentage of vesting
Recognition of Expense for for ** time based awards** using Accelerated Attribution (FIN28)
Where each vesting increment is treated as separate grant expensed starting on grant date. The expense ends up being more “Front-Loaded”
Non-Substantive Vesting
“Vesting with no teeth”
The award will ultimately vest despite the vesting “on paper”, the service period is deemed to have completed at the grant date and the expense is recorded immediately.
An example of this is when vesting is accelerated, or continued, at retirement and the service provider is already retirement eligible.
Non-Substantive Vesting
What happens if the service provider is going to become retirement eligible during the vesting period?
Then the expense is recognized from the grant date to the retirement eligibility date.
Expense is recorded over shorter period.
ASU 2016-09
In 2016 FASB put this out to provide another process for handling forfeitures for service-based awards.
Expense recognized under ASU 718 for Forfeited Shares?
No expense recognized for forfeited shares; any expense already recognized is reversed.
Expense only recognized for grants that vest.