Lessons 1-2 - Types and explanations for conformity Flashcards
1
Q
Compliance
A
- A superficial type of conformity
- Only public views are changed, not private ones
- You do not want to be the odd one out
2
Q
Internalisation
A
- Deeper and more permanent form of conformity
- The individual deems the position of the majority as correct.
- Both private and public views are changed
3
Q
Identification
A
- A moderate type of conformity
- We deem the opinions of the group as correct because we see something of value in the group. We may admire them
- You will change your opinions publicly but not privately
4
Q
Who developed the two process theory for conformity?
A
Deutsch and Gerard (1955)
5
Q
Informational Social Influence
A
- Conformity is driven by the need to be right
- We conform because we are unsure of the correct answer.
- Conformity occurs in situations that are ambiguous, complex and rapid action is required.
- Likely to result in internalisation
6
Q
Normative Social Influence
A
- Driven by a need to be liked
- We only act in a way that is within the ‘norm’ of the group and we do not act in a way that will get us ridiculed
- Likely to lead to compliance.
7
Q
Strengths of the two process theory of conformity
A
- Lucas et al (2006)
- Asch (1951)
8
Q
Lucas et al (2006)
A
- Lucas gave a group of students a series of easy and hard maths questions.
- Conformity occurred more when there were harder questions. This supports ISI as this shows that conformity occurs when the situation is ambiguous.
- Occurred especially with students who felt that their own maths skills were poor
9
Q
Weaknesses of the two process theory of conformity
A
- Lacks population validity. Some people are more concerned with being liked and ‘affiliating’ with a group. These people are called nAffiliators. They are more likely to conform to a group’s opinion. This is shown in McGhee and Teevan (1967) who studied students. Therefore, NSI cannot be applied to everyone.
- Lab studies for NSI and ISI lack ecological validity. Asch (1951) for example lacks mundane realism.