Lesson 9 Flashcards
Way that Christian’s try to respond to the increasing challenge of secularisation
Another way that Christians respond to the increasing secularisation of society is to try to demonstrate that Christianity socially relevant in today’s society.
To argue that Christianity is socially relevant, it is necessary to show that:
the teachings of Christianity can engage with the lives of people in society today
the actions of Christians can engage with the lives of people in society today
these teachings and actions can work for change within society.
What does how Christianity responds to secularisation make them?
-This implies that Christianity is also politically relevant, since politics is concerned with the way society is ordered and the values that direct its communal life.
-Within the Christian community – and particularly within the Evangelical and House Church traditions - there is emphasis on the transforming power of the Christian gospel.
-In other words, individual lives are changed by becoming Christian and adopting Christian beliefs and values.
Individual vs social level
-At an individual level people are transformed, whereas at a social level, they conform to existing social and political norms.
-This reflects the change in the status of religion in society, from something imposed by the state to something that is an individual choice.
-However, the trend towards individuality has not been uniform.
-There are many areas where membership of a particular Church has become a mark of political loyalty. This was seen, particularly, during the ‘troubles’ in Northern Ireland, and in places where Christians are in the minority in society.
Social relevancy first perspective
-If a Christian takes the view that ‘The Kingdom of Heaven’ is primarily about another world, then there is a tendency to simply accept the sinful and distorted nature of society.
-This resignation leads to inaction. This is a ‘quietist’ approach, arguing that everything should be left in God’s hands and that Christians should not engage in social or political action.
Social relevancy - perspective 2
-Alternatively, if the ‘Kingdom’ is regarded as something which Christians are to build in this world, and live it out in their individual and communal lives , there is more likely to be an engagement with society and a direct attempt to change it.
-‘Activists’ argue that the Gospel requires individuals and Churches to engage with the world, particularly in helping the poor and the sick. This may involve direct social and political action of their behalf.
Case study - street pastors
A street pastor is someone who is…
a Christian and is part of a local church;
concerned for society and their local community;
willing to engage with people, whatever their perspective on life and wherever they hang out;
happy to work in a team and in collaboration with other agencies and projects, both statutory and voluntary.
Social relevancy features
-Engagement with society
-A direct attempt to change society for the better.
-Helping the poor and the sick.
-Direct social and political action of their behalf.
Latin American theologians
Following the example of Jesus, Latin American theologians argued that Christians should act in secular society on behalf of the poor and the oppressed.
That might involve becoming active within, for example, education, trade unions and political parties, or even, in extreme circumstances, revolutionary movements.
Libertarian theologians
Liberation theologians were inspired by the actions of Jesus as described in the New Testament.
Liberation theology started from a practical engagement with poverty and political action.
In this sense, it was a necessary secularising of the gospel in order to make it relevant to the lives of ordinary working people.
What was the role of the church for libertarian Christian’s
-For liberation theologians, one role of the Church was to educate people to recognise the difference between their own lives and real justice as described in the gospel and to help them find ways to challenge the forces that oppress them.
-The movement met severe criticism, not least from the Pope. He believed that the presentation of Jesus as some kind of political revolutionary was not true to the gospel or the teachings of the Church.
A fundamental split developed concerning the role of the Church:
- Liberationists
- Traditionalists
In other words, it was fundamentally a question about the Church and secularisation. Should the Church be involved with the secular world of social injustice and politics, or should it offer only spiritual help, bringing individuals into a new relationship with God?
This was never a completely either/or choice. Liberationists did not deny the value of spirituality, nor did the traditionalists deny concerns about exploitation and poverty. It was more a matter of balance, and of methods of working.
Liberationists
wanted to change society to promote justice and give power to the poor and powerless. It saw this as the natural and practical application of the teaching of Jesus.
Traditionalists
believed that the primary concern of the Church was to support the poor by offering spiritual aid to individuals.
Measuring process of secularisation
-One way the process of secularisation may be measured is by asking people about their attendance at public acts of worship.
-The percentage of people who attend Church regularly is decreasing, so on that basis, Britain is increasingly becoming a secular country.
Even though society is becoming secular what do people still want
-However, many people who do not attend Church nevertheless feel a sense of attachment to a local church building.
-It may represent the place where they, or their relatives, were married or buried; it may provide a sense of permanence and continuity in a world where everything else changes; it may also serve as a focus in times of need (as when there is a local tragedy) or celebration.
-Thus, the sense of ownership of a church building - and sometimes the defence of that building if it is threatened with closure - may indicate that society is less secular than expected.