LESSON #5: Euro-Canadian "Justice" Systems and Traditional Indigenous Justice Flashcards
Canadian system
relies on incapacitation and other forms of deterrence, is largely driven by capitalism, greed, wealth addiction, and money. It relies heavily on the invocation of police, courts, and corrections systems
Because so much emphasis is placed on self-interest in Euro-Canadian society…
(3)
(1) the current social and economic system and present conditions dictate a way of life that is highly individualized, divided, and centred on greed.
(2) This system permits a small number of “elite” people to hold power, and they exploit the earth’s resources for their benefit and profit while disregarding other people, beings, and nature in general.
(3) The system also creates institutions to maintain this hierarchical order by disciplining and incapacitating those who do not follow the rules. One of these institutions is the Euro-Canadian criminal justice system.
Rather than actually trying to eliminate crime, the system is set up to fail because…
(2)
(1) its main purpose is to deflect attention away from societal injustice, a root cause of crime, and toward the notion of the poor as a criminal class.
(2) Thus, the criminal justice system “serves the interests of the rich and powerful . . . the very ones who could change criminal justice policy if they were really unhappy with it
Reiman contends that the criminal justice system ignores or minimizes the damaging acts of the elite, so crime comes to be conceived of as “the work of the poor.” This view has powerful ideological implications.
(3)
(1) First, it communicates that any danger to society comes from the poor.
(2) Second, it implies that people are in poverty because of their own failings and not because of greater social wrongs or historical legacies.
(3) Third, it characterizes poorer people, especially those who break the rules, as somehow morally inadequate, unrestrained, or lazy
Three institutions that are major components of this unequal system.
the police, courts, and corrections
“starlight tours,”
(3)
(1) also known as the freezing deaths.
(2) These deaths are the result of police brutality, of the police picking up Indigenous peoples, who typically appear drunk or under the influence of drugs, and then driving them to the outskirts of town, leaving them to fend for themselves in freezing temperatures.
(3) Many of these Indigenous peoples have died from hypothermia or untreated beatings
many of the Indigenous peoples being policed and the non-Indigenous officers doing the policing saw as unfavourable, the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND). Thus, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, introduced
The “Band Constable Program” in 1969
Band Constable Program
(2)
(1) Under this program, band councils hired band constables from the Indigenous community being policed to enforce band by-laws.
(2) In 1971, this program was expanded to include the hiring of “special constables” from Indigenous communities to supplement the senior police forces at the local level.
Report of Task Force: Policing on Reserves
Issued by the Indian and Northern Affairs recommending options for Indigenous policing
The Report of Task Force: Policing on Reserves recommended three options for Indigenous policing
(1) band council policing,
(2) municipal policing, and
(3) provincial policing.
the major initiative under which Option 3b was implemented
The RCMP’s Native Special Constable Program
The RCMP’s Native Special Constable Program
(2)
(1) Under this program, Indigenous peoples were recruited to police other Indigenous peoples in their own communities.
(2) The Indigenous officers received 16 weeks of training at the RCMP training headquarters in Regina before being posted in their home communities; non-Indigenous recruits received 25 weeks of training
The RCMP’s Special Constable Program was criticized for a number of reasons
(4)
(1) it lacked Indigenous peoples’ input into the program and its operations,
(2) it failed to define the role of the participants adequately,
(3) and it provided lower salaries and less training to Indigenous special constables than to regular members of the RCMP.
(4) Indigenous peoples were also reluctant to join the program, given community hostility to this police force and social isolation
In 1990, the Native Special Constable Program was terminated and replaced with…
Aboriginal Constable Development Program
Aboriginal Constable Development Program
was designed to increase the number of Indigenous peoples eligible to become regular RCMP members
programs generally seek to hire more Indigenous police officers and to provide cultural training for non-Indigenous officers; though this plan is not necessarily bad, relying so heavily on one concept
restricts making larger changes that might contribute to a significant reduction in the high rates of over-representation of Indigenous peoples as both victims and those incarcerated within the system.
Related to this legitimate distrust of criminal justice officials is the debate over
whether Indigenous peoples are “over-policed” or “under-policed
over-policing
(2)
(1) maintains that Indigenous peoples are singled out by police officers—who impose on Indigenous peoples “police control . . . at a level unlikely to occur in the dominant society.”
(2) The argument is that Indigenous peoples are stereotyped by police forces, charged with offences more than non-Indigenous peoples, and generally harassed.
under-policing
(2)
(1) contends that the police tend to ignore Indigenous communities in the sense that officers are typically not present on a day-to-day basis to prevent crime or provide other police services to Indigenous peoples
(2) police only come to Indigenous communities to make an arrest
In 1996, the federal government decided to use law reform to address the high incidence of Indigenous peoples’ incarceration. Its first action was to…
(2)
(1) add a qualification to restrict the use of incarceration as a sanction
(2) The courts declared that the stated intent of this measure was to decrease the incarceration of Aboriginal offenders
Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code
All available sanctions other than imprisonment that are reasonable in the circumstances, should be considered for all offenders, with particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal Offenders
This provision then became the focus of imperative ruling judgements from the Supreme Court of Canada
Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code
R. v. Gladue
(5)
(1) involved a young Indigenous woman named Jamie Gladue
(2) During a drunken argument, she had stabbed and killed her boyfriend while fighting over whether he had cheated with her sister.
(3) In the Supreme Court of British Columbia, she pled guilty to manslaughter.
(4) She was sentenced to three years in prison. Her appeal was heard in the Supreme Court of Canada, and, although her sentence was not actually changed, the ruling did provide a detailed statement on the operation of section 718.2(e) and on the duty of sentencing judges to find alternatives to incarceration for Indigenous defendants
(5) The court recognized that systemic factors contribute to the overrepresentation of Indigenous peoples in the criminal justice system, explicitly named restorative justice as a solution, and called for creative criminal justice responses fitted to the circumstances of Indigenous peoples.
This case called on judges to use a different method of analysis when deciding on a fitting sentence for Indigenous offenders, one giving specific attention to the unique circumstances of those offenders.
R. v. Ipeelee
The wording in this case describes the statutory duties of judges sentencing Aboriginal peoples and is much more direct than in Gladue
R. v. Ipeelee
Difference between R. v. Ipeelee and R. v. Gladue
R v. Gladue uses the term “may” in regards to considering alternatives to sentencing for Aboriginal peoples, R v. Ipeelee uses “must” and expresses this requirement strongly
Supreme Court justices stressed the importance of Gladue reports
(2)
(1) These reports are done for Indigenous offenders and contain case-specific information.
(2) They are tailored to the specific circumstances of Indigenous offenders, providing detailed information about an individual’s life history and unique circumstances, which are presented within the context of the systemic and historical factors faced by all Indigenous peoples
Gladue reports
(5)
(1) can be done for any Indigenous offender in any court.
(2) They can be started after a guilty plea or upon a finding of guilt.
(3) They are used in sentencing to help judges take into consideration Indigenous peoples’ circumstances.
(4) Depending on the services offered in the area, Indigenous court workers or probation officers might facilitate the writing of such a report.
(5) In places where more Indigenous court workers are available, they will usually write these reports
Gladue Aboriginal Persons Courts
(2)
(1) do not perform differently than other courts; however, they do offer all services in one place, including bail hearings, bail variations, remands, trials, and sentencing.
(2) What differentiates this type of court is that those working in it have specific knowledge of and expertise in the variety of services and programs available to Indigenous peoples
first Indigenous-specific court in Canada
Tsuu T’ina First Nation Court in Alberta, which opened in 2000.
first urban Aboriginal court in Canada
Toronto’s Gladue court, which opened in 2001,
judges frequently rely on this as a justification for ordering a conditional sentence
Gladue
net-widening
describes a particular phenomenon that occurs when a program that is set up to divert people away from the criminal justice system—usually by preventing their incarceration—instead causes more people to enter the system, people who might not have entered it otherwise.
in the majority of cases, “conditional sentences are being handed down where probations orders, fines, and suspended sentences would normally have been ordered.” As compared to these sanctions…
(3)
(1) conditional sentences can be significantly more “coercive and intense.”
(2) Some people who might not have gone to prison consequently find themselves there.
(3) Research shows that Indigenous offenders who receive conditional sentences are disproportionately prosecuted for breaching conditions.
Trial judges might also be tempted to order a conditional sentence instead of probation
(2)
(1) so they could require orders for treatment or medication or impose lengthier community service obligations.
(2) The longer and more arduous conditions become, the more likely that a breach will occur.
Roach and Rudin suggest make this makes it unlikely that Gladue-inspired sentencing innovations will have any major effect on lowering the high rates of Indigenous incarceration
problems related to conditional sentencing—combined with a young and growing Indigenous population, a shortage of community programs providing prison alternatives, and a hesitancy to stop ordering prison in serious cases