Lesson 4.3: Futures and Forwards Flashcards
In May, an investor purchased a futures contract to purchase 5,000 bushels of wheat at $4.30 per bushel for December delivery. On settlement date, the spot price of wheat is $4.20 per bushel. For the investor, this:
represents a loss of $500
Unlike options, both parties to a futures contract are obligated to perform. That is, the buyer must accept delivery of the contract (in this case, 5,000 bushels of wheat). In practical matters, instead of having a truck show up at the door, the wheat would be sold at its spot price to a user. Therefore, the investor would lose 10 cents per bushel, which on 5,000 bushels is $500. It was the seller of the contract who had a successful hedge because, instead of having to sell at the $4.20 spot price, the wheat is sold at the strike price of $4.30.
One way in which futures contracts differ from options contracts is that:
both parties are obligated on futures contracts whereas only the seller is obligated on an options contract.
Unlike options contracts, where only the seller of the option is obligated to perform (if the option is exercised), both parties to a futures contract are obligated to fulfill the terms.
The long party in a futures contract has entered the contract as:
a buyer
Long is the industry term describing the buyer of a futures contract. The long is committed to buying the underlying asset at the pre-agreed-upon price on the specified future date.
Short is the industry term describing the seller of the futures contract. The short is committed to delivering the underlying asset in exchange for the pre-agreed-upon price on the specified future date. Market maker is a term used for securities, not futures, and liquidity provider is a concept that is not tested (as is the case with many incorrect answer choices).
Forward contracts
are a one-to-one investment where the buyer and seller set the terms of the deal. Lack of standardization makes exchange trading forward contracts an impossibility.
In contrast with a typical forwards contract, futures contracts have
standardized terms
Futures are contracts that trade on exchanges and have standardized terms, in contrast with forwards contracts, which are customized instruments. A futures clearinghouse reduces counterparty risk by guaranteeing the performance of buyers and sellers. Because futures contracts trade on organized exchanges and have standardized terms, they are more liquid than forwards contracts.
A speculator, believing that a drought in the Midwest will lead to a weak corn crop, would probably:
take a long position in corn futures
A weak corn crop means a shortage in the supply. That will lead to an increase in prices. When one is speculating that prices will go up, the best position is a long one. So, why not the long forwards? Those who purchase forward contracts anticipate accepting delivery of the asset. This individual is merely speculating and has no interest in taking physical possession of the commodity and paying for transportation, silage, and insurance until the commodity is sold. If the person in the question had been a user of corn (a cereal maker, for example), then the forward contract would have been a better choice.
News reports indicate that the wheat crop scheduled to be harvested in three months will be much larger than normal. To hedge, a wheat farmer would most likely:
take a short position in wheat futures
A bumper crop means lower prices for the producers (farmers). The appropriate protection is a short hedge—selling wheat futures. Think of it this way: if you thought a stock’s price was going to decline, you would sell that stock short. Here, believing that wheat prices will decline, you take a short position in that commodity futures contract. There is no such thing as wheat stock, and the wheat has already been planted; it is too late to switch crops.
Nonsecurities derivatives include futures and forwards. Among the differences between futures and forwards is that futures contracts:
are rarely exercised, while forwards generally are
In the vast majority of the cases, futures contracts are closed out prior to expiration. That is one reason they are more popular with speculators than forwards. Because forwards are generally delivered, they are the preferred tool by producers, and it is futures that are standardized and CFTC regulates, not forwards.
All of the following statements regarding futures contracts are correct:
A) a short position will increase in value if the underlying commodity or asset declines in value.
B) purchasing a contract for future delivery is considered taking a long position.
C) futures contracts can be written on financial assets or commodities.
In almost all cases, the holder of the futures contract will purchase an offsetting contract canceling the original position or sell the contract prior to expiration.
In isolated cases, delivery of the commodity may be made but is not required. Futures contracts can be written on financial assets such as currencies and stock indexes, as well as on commodities such as agricultural products or precious metals. As with anyone taking a short position, the value goes up when the price of the underlying asset declines. And, just as purchasing a stock or bond, a long position represents one of ownership.
Which has no active secondary market?
Forward contracts
One of the disadvantages when investing in forward contracts is that there is no active secondary market. Because each contract is between one buyer and one seller and there is no standardization, no exchange trading is possible.
Which type of contract obligates both parties to act?
I. Forward contract
II. Futures contract
III. Options contract
IV. Warrant
I & II
It is only in the case of forward and futures contracts that both parties are obligated to fulfill the terms of the contract. Only the seller of an options contract is obligated, and in the case of a warrant, it is the issuer of the warrant who is obligated to deliver the underlying shares if the owner exercises.
Which of these would be specified in an exchange-traded futures contract?
I. The quantity of the underlying asset
II. The quality of the underlying asset
III. The time of delivery of the underlying asset
IV. The location of delivery of the underlying asset
ALL
Typically, there are five standardized parts to an exchange-traded futures contract:
Quantity of the commodity (e.g., 5,000 bushels of corn or 100 oz. of gold)
Quality of the commodity (specific grade or range of grades may be acceptable for delivery, including price adjustments for different deliverable grades)
Delivery price (similar to exercise or strike price with options)
Time for delivery (e.g., December wheat to be delivered)
Location (approved for delivery)
An investment adviser representative attends a seminar discussing derivative investments. It would be unlikely that there would be any mention of:
REITs are not derivatives, but options (both puts and calls), futures (and forwards), and warrants (and stock rights) are.
A manufacturer of soybean oil is concerned that the price of soybeans will increase over the next six months. The best strategy to employ would probably be:
a long hedge.
The concern is that the price will go up. Just as with options, when we are concerned that the price of something will go up, we go long that item. With options, it would be a long call; with futures, it is simply hedging by going long (buying) the soybean futures. The soybean farmer who would be concerned about a decline in the price would go short soybean futures.
A farmer who produces soybeans believes that this year’s crop will be the biggest ever. The farmer would most likely hedge this risk by:
going short soybean forwards.
A big crop means more supply and lower prices when the crop is harvested. Hedging involves taking an opposite position (benefiting if prices fall). If the farmer is correct, selling short at today’s price will enable delivery in the future at that higher price. Because this is a producer who will have product to deliver, forwards are likely to be more appropriate than futures.