Lesson 4: Federalists, Antifederalists, the Bill of Rights Flashcards
Amend Definition
to change
Antifederalists Definition
opponents of a strong central government
Federalist Papers Definition
a series of essays by Federalists James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay in support of ratifying the Constitution
Federalists Definition
supporters of a strong central government
Ratify Definition
to give official approval
What was the process the framers set up to ratify the constitution?
The framers had set up a process for the states to approve, or ratify, the new government. The Constitution would go into effect when at least 9 of the 13 states had ratified it. In 1787 and 1788, voters in each state elected delegates to special state conventions. These delegates would decide whether or not to ratify the Constitution.
What did supporters of the constitution call themselves? What they call those that opposed the constitution?
In every state, heated debates took place. Supporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists because they favored a strong federal, or national, government. They called people who opposed the Constitution Antifederalists.
What were the arguments of the Federalists? What did the Federalist papers state? What was their influence?
Federalists argued that the Articles of Confederation left too much power with the individual states. This imbalance produced a dangerously weak central government. Disputes among the states, Federalists said, made it too difficult for the government to function. Federalists believed that the Constitution gave the national government the authority it needed to function effectively. At the same time, they said, the Constitution still protected the rights and powers of the individual states. Federalists James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote a series of essays, known today as the Federalist Papers . Their purpose was to explain and defend the Constitution. They used pen names, but most people knew who they were. Today, the Federalist Papers remain among the best discussions of the political theory behind the American system of government.
What is the influence of the Federalist Papers today?
Courts still refer to the Federalist Papers in making decisions about the principles and role of government. In this way, they have had a lasting influence on the U.S. system of government.
What were the arguments of antifederalists? How did Patrick Henry support these arguemnets?
Antifederalists felt that the Constitution made the national government too strong and left the states too weak. They also thought that the Constitution gave the President too much power. Patrick Henry of Virginia protested:
This Constitution is said to have beautiful features, but … they appear to me horribly frightful. … Your President may become king … If your American chief be a man of ambition and abilities, how easy is it for him to render himself absolute!
—Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Convention, June 1788
Despite the fact that most believed George Washington was going to become president, what did the antifederalists warn against?
Most people expected George Washington to be elected President. Antifederalists admired Washington, but they warned that future Presidents might lack Washington’s honor and skill. For this reason, they said, the office should not be too powerful.
What was the chief objection by the antifederalists? How did the Federalists argue against it?
The chief objection of Antifederalists was that the Constitution had no bill, or list, of rights. Federalists held that it was impossible to list all the natural rights of people. Besides, they said, the Constitution protected citizens well enough as it was.
What were the Antifederalists’ arguments for a Bill of Rights, in response to Federalists?
Antifederalists responded that a bill of rights was needed to protect such basic liberties as freedom of speech and religion. Unless these rights were spelled out, they could be too easily ignored or denied by the government. Americans, after all, had just fought a revolution to protect their freedoms against a too-powerful government. Violations of those freedoms were the main grievances cited in the Declaration of Independence. Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was needed to address those grievances. Under the new Constitution, the President would have veto power over Congress—the people’s representatives. Surely placing so much power in one man’s hands, the Antifederalists argued, likewise demanded the protection of a bill of rights.
What was George Manson’s influence on the Constitution?
One of the strongest supporters of a bill of rights was George Mason of Virginia. In 1776, Mason had written the bill of rights for Virginia’s constitution. After the Constitutional Convention refused to include a bill of rights, Mason joined the Antifederalists. Mason wrote a pamphlet opposing the ratification of the Constitution. The pamphlet was titled, simply, “Objections to This Constitution of Government.” Its opening words were equally direct: “There is no Declaration of Rights.”
Who ratified the constitution first? Which states followed? What was the main reason for ratification in states that ratified the Constitution later?
One by one, the states voted. Delaware led the way, ratifying on December 7, 1787. Pennsylvania and New Jersey soon followed. In these states, as in the states that ratified later, the main cause behind ratification was that Federalists were able to convince a majority of delegates that the Constitution would bring an improved system of government.