Lesson 4 Flashcards
why is EV distribution relevant?
because it is the main determinant of bankruptcy risk and thus the consequential cost of debt (kd)
why is there a relationship between cash flow risk and dispersion of possible enterprise value?
because each year projected cashflows are not certain, and EV is a function of the sum of DCFs
what are the two components of EV?
risk free component: value that can be attributed to stable, predictable, and low-risk assets or cash flows
risky component: part of EV that fluctuates based on market conditions, business performance, or other uncertain factors
why should a creditworthiness evaluation model be consistent with option evaluation theories?
because a company’s liabilities represent rights to the company’s assets, which often take the form of options and can be priced
what is the implication of using market values for credit risk assessment?
it allows to provide a realistic description of the relationship between the characteristics of the company (its value) and the probability of default on its debts.
if the company is listed, the evaluation has been already performed by the market, and is reflected in the market value of the company. If the company is not listed than it is necessary to determine its market value based on future cash flows.
in the capital structure, who has the lowest reimbursement priority? what are the implications?
equity.
as a company’s future operating prospects start to look better or worse, EV changes and the share price will be the FIRST to reflect the change in prospects
in conditions of failure, is it necessary that the company has sufficient liquidity to pay interest on the portion of debt falling due? Why?
no.
what is relevant is whether the market value of the company’s net assets (EV) is adequate compared to the level of debt
if the company’s assets have sufficient market value, the company can raise the necessary liquidity:
1. selling part of its assets
2. issuing equity
3. issuing debt
concluding, a company’s ability to pay back (in the future, when due) its debt depends on its future market value and not on the (instantaneous) value of its future cash
2 definitions of bankruptcy (law interpretation)
- default with respect to liquidity (no liquidity to pay interest or repay capital)
- default at value (EV < nominal value of fin. D)
3 necessary conditions for failure to occur (simultaneamente)
- contractual condition (company is obliged to repay the debt)
- liquidity condition (company does not have necessary liquidity to repay the debt)
- value condition (no possibility of raising further financing that guarantees the liquidity necessary to repay the debts)
how can the logic of “liquidity” bankruptcy lead to wrong conclusions?
- company has made investments with high NPV > in the future it will generate value (EV and GW) > however, it is in a temporary liquidity crisis > at the same time, in the future it will generate value and EV grows compared to nominal debt > better prospective financial situation, worse current liquidity situation. Conclusion: in a RATIONAL and EFFICIENT market, there will always be an investor (E) or financier (D) willing to provide additional capital to overcome TEMPORARY lack of liquidity
- company has subscribed long term debt which will liquidate its operating assets > this condition CANCELS future operating CFs, but gives enough LIQUIDITY to service interest and principal payments.
Conclusion: IF liquidity raised < value of debt, the company is “virtually bankrupts” even if it does not have CURRENT financial imbalances or lack of liquidity
why is the value default condition that EV < D, and NOT ONLY the MATURING debt?
bankrupcty occurs when a company does not have sufficient liquidity AND does not have sufficient “reserves of value”
imagine a company with
- EV of 800
- Debt of 1000
- Maturing debt (debt to be repaid) of 150
we can hypothesize two cases:
a) the firm has sufficient liquidity: it repays debt but is still “virtually bankrupt”, as after repayment EV < D (650 < 850). At the following payment…
b) the company does not have sufficient liquidity to repay the debt. Selling part of its assets would just delay bankruptcy, it would only make the company more liquid but decrease its value. In order to raise sufficient liquidity it should:
1) increase capital: additional equity would just be used to satisfy the value of UNCOVERED debts. Debtholders would be happy and shareholders would be stupid.
2) “replace” debt: the creditor knows that part of the debt will not be returned. The loan has negative NPV and the creditor would just be participating in the failure.
How do you determine expected loss in case of bankruptcy?
once the distribution of the possible enterprise values at debt maturity has been determined, the company decides the level of nominal debt it assumes (consider graph on slide 10)
EL = loss for each EV below D_nom * respective probabilities
what determines minimum EV?
risk free debt, where K_d = i_riskfree
what is the equilibrium condition of debt?
expected EV at time of repayment is a t least equal to the value of TOTAL debt
what is a company’s probability of default?
the probability that the expected EV realized in year “n” is lower than the value of the debt.
! in this case, the company would not be able to refinance the debt and collect necessary liquidity, ending up in actual default.
!! default is a phenomenon that OCCURS in the presence of a liquidity imbalance but ARISES from a value imbalance