Lesson 33: Fallacies of Distraction Flashcards

1
Q

What is an informal fallacy?

A

An informal fallacy is a popular but invalid (or unhelpful) form of argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a fallacy of distraction?

A

A fallacy of distraction is an argument that confuses the issue by pointing to information that is actually irrelevant to the cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the eight fallacies of distraction?

A
  1. Ipse Dixit
  2. Ad Populum
  3. Ad Baculum
  4. Ad Hominem
  5. Bulverism
  6. Tu Quoque
  7. Ad Ignorantiam
  8. Chronological Snobbery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an Ipse dixit fallacy?

A

Ipse dixit is an illegitimate appeal to authority.
Ipse dixit: “Henry Schwartz says there is no Creator, and therefore, there is no Creator.”
Not ipse dixit: “The Bible says God is the Creator, and therefore, God is the Creator.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an Ad populum fallacy?

A

Ad populum is an illegitimate appeal to a majority.
Ad populum: “This story must be truly great—it’s a bestseller!”
Not ad populum: “Everyone has found the Bible to be a profitable book—you should read it too.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an Ad baculum fallacy?

A

Ad baculum is an illegitimate appeal to force.
Ad baculum: “If you don’t vote for Senator Snoutsnuffle, the ozone layer will be destroyed in six months, and we will all die!”
Not ad baculum: “If you do not see the wisdom of our laws against murder, perhaps you will be influenced by our death penalty…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an Ad hominem fallacy?

A

Ad hominem is a verbal attack on a person rather than his argument.
Ad hominem: “Yes, we know that you maintain that the sun rises in the east every morning. But we also know that you’re a jerk.”
Not ad hominem: “How can we believe your testimony? You’ve been convicted of perjury three times in the past two years.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a Bulverism fallacy?

A

Bulverism is attacking a position by pointing out how the arguer came to hold it.
Bulverism: “You are saying that infants shouldn’t be baptized because you grew up in a Baptist home.”
Not bulverism: “You are running for Congress as a Democrat today but yesterday you lost the Republican primary. You are just maintaining the Democratic platform because of a personal ambition.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a Tu quoque fallacy?

A

Tu quoque points to an inconsistency between a person’s argument and behavior.
Tu quoque: “Don’t tell me I can’t smuggle cocaine—you do it too!”
Not tu quoque: “Why are you telling me it’s wrong to read fiction? You do it too.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an Ad ignorantiam fallacy?

A

Ad ignorantiam is an argument from lack of evidence.
Ad ignorantiam: “UFOs must be alien spaceships. The government has never offered any other satisfactory explanation.
Not ad ignorantiam: “I remind the jury that my client is innocent until proven guilty.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a Chronological snobbery fallacy?

A

Chronological snobbery is an argument based merely on the passage of time.
Chronological snobbery: “Categorical logic may have worked for Aristotle, but it’s outdated now.”
Not chronological snobbery: “I think that we should be more careful before we dismiss something our ancestors have done for centuries.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly