lesson 3 Flashcards
1
Q
advantage of concentrating collector over the flat collector
A
- the size of the absorber can be reduced giving high concentrating ratio
- thermal losses are less than FPC, However, small losses occur in the concentrating collector because of its optical system as well as by reflection absorption by mirrors and lenses.
- the efficiency increases at high temperatures.
- in these collectors the area intercepting the solar radiation is greater than the absorber area
- these collectors are used in high-temperature applications
- Reflectors cost less per unit area than a flat-plate collector
- A focusing or concentrating system can be used for electrical power generation when not used for heating or cooling
- little or no anti-freeze is required to protect the absorber in a concentrated system
2
Q
disadvantage of concentrating collector over the flat collector
A
- only the beam component is collected in the case of focusing collectors because the diffuse component cannot be reflected and thus is lost
- in some stationary reflecting systems it is necessary to have a small absorber to track the sun image; in others, the reflector may have to be adjustable to more than one position if year-round operation is desired; in other words, costly orienting systems have to be used to track the sun.
- additional requirement of maintenance particularly to retain the quality of reflecting surface against dirt, weather, oxidation etc.
- non-uniform flux on absorber whereas flux in flat-plate collectors in uniform
- additional optical losses such as reflectance and intercept loss, so they introduce additional factors in energy balance
- high initial cost
3
Q
disadvantage of solar air heater
A
- need to handle a larger volume of air than a liquid due to the low density of air as the working substance
- thermal capacity for air is low
- they have relatively high fluid circulation cost
- they have relatively high volume of storage
5.
6.