Lesson 2: Political Conflict and Economic Crisis Flashcards
Caucus Definition
a meeting held by a political party to choose their party’s candidate for president or decide policy
Daniel Webster Definition
He was a Massachusetts Senator who opposed slavery and supported the Compromise of 1850.
Depression Definition
a period of low economic activity and wide-spread unemployment
John Calhoun
He was a statesman from South Carolina who held many offices in the federal government, including vice president and U.S. senator. He became a strong supporter of states’ rights. In 1850, he foresaw future conflicts over slavery that would eventually lead to the American Civil War.
Martin Van Buren Definition
He was the eighth president of the United States, serving from 1837 to 1841. He was blamed for the Panic of 1837 and the widespread unemployment and poverty that it brought and was not reelected for a second term.
Nominating Convention
system in which delegates from the states selected the party’s presidential candidate
Nullification Act Definition
an act passed by South Carolina that declared that the Tariff of 1832 unconstitutional
States’ Rights Definition
the idea that states have the right to limit the power of the federal government
Unemployment Definition
Number of workers who are without jobs.
How did the economies of the three regions differ?
The conflict over states’ rights divided the country along regional lines. The United States at the time was made up of three regions. The North included the New England and Middle Atlantic states. Manufacturing and trade were very important to the economy of the North. The West was the region we now know as the Midwest. Its economy was based mainly on farming to raise livestock and food crops. Finally, the South consisted of today’s Southeast and South Central states. The South’s people relied heavily on farming to produce cash crops for export, such as cotton and tobacco.
How did the beliefs of the North and the South differ? Where did the West stand on these ideas?
Politically, northerners generally favored a strong federal government, which they saw as necessary to promote manufacturing and trade. Southerners feared the domination of the North and national policies that could hurt southern interests. Consequently, southerners tended to support stronger states’ rights. These differences often made it hard for people from the North and South to agree on political issues. Westerners sometimes sided with the North and sometimes with the South. For example, westerners wanted internal improvements for transportation, which most northerners supported. Westerners also wanted to be free to move into new territories, which southerners also wanted. Some westerners supported slavery, while others did not. In general, westerners agreed with northerners about tariffs.
What was an important crop in the West? What device was made to harvest it?
Wheat was an important crop in the West. The McCormick Reaper, which was invented in 1831, made the work of harvesting wheat much easier.
What were Northern and Southern views on the Tariff of Abomination, passed by President John Quincy Adams in 1828?
In 1828, with the support of then President John Quincy Adams, Congress passed the highest tariff in the history of the nation. Southerners called it the Tariff of Abominations. An abomination is something that is wrong and evil. Just like earlier tariffs, the new law, which was passed before Andrew Jackson’s first term, protected manufacturers from foreign competition. Most manufacturers lived in the North and were helped by the tariff. Southern planters, however, were hurt by it. Southerners sold much of their cotton to Britain and bought British manufactured goods in return. A high tariff would mean that southerners had to pay more for those British goods. Worse still, they feared that if the United States imposed a tariff on British manufactures, Britain could respond by imposing a tariff on American cotton. Many southerners thought the tariff was unconstitutional.
What were Vice President John Calhoun’s views on Nullification?
A leader in the South’s fight against the tariff was Vice President John Calhoun, whose home state was South Carolina. He claimed that a state had the right to nullify, or cancel, a federal law that the state considered to be unconstitutional. This idea is called nullification. Calhoun believed that the states’ rights gave them power over the provisions of the Constitution. He argued that states could reject federal laws that they thought violated the constitution, because the states had joined together to form the federal government based on their understanding of the Constitution.
Why did Daniel Webster disagree with John Calhoun’s views on Nullification?
Daniel Webster, a Senator from Massachusetts, disagreed. He made a speech in 1830 to the Senate attacking the idea of nullification. The Constitution, he said, united the American people, not just the states, as a nation. If states had the right to nullify federal laws, the nation would fall apart. The U.S. Supreme Court had also ruled against earlier attempts at nullification, arguing that the provisions of Article III of the U.S. Constitution gave federal courts, not states, the right to decide on the constitutionality of federal laws.