Lesson 19: Comparing Options Flashcards
Inequalities for call options
+ S ≥ Camer(S,K,T) ≥ Ceur(S,K,T) ≥ max (0, prepaid F(S) - Ke^(-rT)
+ For European call option:
Prepaid F(S) ≥ Ceur(S,K,T) ≥ max (0, prepaid F(S) - Ke^(-rT)
Inequalities for put options
+ K ≥ Pamer(S,K,T) ≥ Peur(S,K,T) ≥ max(0,Ke^(-rT) - prepaid F(S)
+ For European put options:
Ke^(-rT) ≥ Peur(S,K,T) ≥ max(0, Ke^(-rT) - prepaid F(S))
Every call option has an implicit put option built into it
The implicit put option consists of the option not to exercise the option. This means that at expiry of the call option, you will not exercise the option of the price of the option is less than K -> you “sell” or put the stock at price K back to the writer of the option
Compare American options and European options for stocks without dividends
For stocks without div:
- An American call option is worth the same as a European call option
- An American put option may be worth more than a European put option
Summary of relationships of option prices and time to expiry, T > t
- An American option with expiry T must cost ≥ the same one with expiry t
- A European call option on a nondiv stock with expiry T must cost ≥ the same one with expiry t
- A European option on nondiv stock with expiry T and strike price Ke^(r(T-t)) must cost ≥ the one with expiry t and strike price K
Direction of strike price in options
For a call option, the higher the K, the lower the premium
For a put option, the higher the K, the higher the premium
Create arbitrage that maximizes the initial gain (use direction of premiums), suppose K2 > K1 and C(S,K2,T) > C(S,K1,T)
Sell 1 K2- strike call and buy 1 K1-strike call:
+ Immediate gain: C(S,K2,T) - C(S,K1,T)
+ 3 possibilities:
* St ≤ K1 -> neither option pays
* K1 ≤ St ≤ K2 -> the option you bought pays St - K1, the option you sold doesn’t pay
* St > K2 -> the option you bought pays St - K1, the option you sold pays St - K2
Create an arbitrage that has minimal cost (direction of premiums) suppose K2 > K1 and C(S,K2,T) > C(S,K1,T)
Sell 1 K2-strike call and buy c = C(S,K2,T) / C(S,K1,T)
Slope of strike prices in options
- For a call option, premium decreases more slowly than K increases
- For a put option, the premium increases more slowly than K increases
Create arbitrage for call that maximizes the initial gain (use slope of premiums), suppose K2 > K1 and C(S,K1,T) - C(S,K2,T) > K2 - K1
sell 1 K1-strike call and buy 1 K2-strike call
Create arbitrage for call that minimizes the initial gain (use slope of premiums), suppose K2 > K1 and C(S,K1,T) - C(S,K2,T) > K2 - K1
Buy 1 K2-strike call and sell cK1-strike call with
c = C(S<K2, T) / [(C(S, K1, T) - (K2 - K1)]
Convexity
Option premiums are convex.
- The rate of decrease in call premiums as a function of K decreases.
C(S,K2,T) ≤ [(K2 - K1)C(S,K3,T) + (K3-K2)C(S,K1,T)] / (K3 - K1)
- The rate of increases in put premiums as a function of K increases
P(S,K2,T) ≤ [(K2 - K1)P(S,K3,T) + (K3-K2)P(S,K1,T)] / (K3 - K1)
Convexity mispricing
if there’s a mispricing, the option in the middle will be overpriced relative to the other 2 options -> sell the option in the middle and buy the ones at the 2 extremes
Arbitrage that maximizes gain when there’s a mispricing in call premium (convexity) (K1 < K2 < K3)
Sell K2-strike call, buy (K2-K1)/(K3-K1) K3-strike call, buy (K3-K2)/(K3-K1) K1-strike call
Arbitrage that minimizes loss when there’s a mispricing in call premium (convexity) (K1 < K2 < K3)
Sell one K2-stkie call and buy (u/v)p K1-strike call and (u/v)q K3-strike call
p = (K3-K2)/(K3-K1), q = (K2-K1)/(K3-K1)