Lesson 1: Introduction Flashcards
Ward & Cao (2012)
Resources: Green taxation Show how green taxation per capita varies over time. Scandinavian countries + UK + Germany have the highest levels
Ward & Cao (2012)
Resources: Green taxation Show how green taxation varies over time . Scandinavian countries + UK + Germany have the highest levels
Busch (2012)
Resources: Environmental policy/strategy Number of environmental policies have been steadily increasing since 1988
List & Sturm 2006
Institutions: Elections and environmental policy
Hainmueller & Hangartner
Direct democracy and naturalization decisions in Switzerland
Hainmueller & Hangartner
Direct democracy and naturalization decisions in Switzerland
What could be possible sources of green taxation?
Actors: Policymakers, voters, firms Incentives – Policymakers: maximize votes – Voters: maximizes own welfare – Firms: maximize profits Policy is more progressive if: • Voters hold more green environmental ideal points • Economy is less dependent on energy-intense production • Other countries implement more progressive policies
Policy/ outcome example: Immigration in Switzerland
− MEI: some prefer less immigration than others → why? Case highlights a different perspective: decision-making mode Electoral system → initiative: Volks- und Ständemehr (majoritarian system: absolute majority of votes and of cantons)
Aggregation of preferences
j
Aggregation of preferences
Remember: Actors have to aggregate their preferences to reach a policy decision. Take preference orders => Institution/ social choice mechanism => Collective decision/ social choice
Aggregation of preferences
Remember: Actors have to aggregate their preferences to reach a policy decision. Take preference orders => Institution/ social choice mechanism => Collective decision/ social choice
Institutions
Consist of decision-making procedures and electoral systems Examples: - Elections and environmental policy (List/Sturm 2006) - Direct democracy and naturalization decisions in Switzerland (Hainmueller/Hangartner 20xx)
Decision making modes in environmental politics
Voting Bargaining Lottery • Voting: Typical way of decisionmaking in politics • However, voting is often the result of a bargaining process: vote trading
Approval voting
List all options, mark those that you find acceptable (“approve”)
Majority rule vs. approval voting
- Approval voting field experiment in German federal elections (Alos-Ferrer/Granic 2012) - In two electoral districts (Konstanz and Messel), citizens first vote officially and then unofficially using approval voting - Result: In Messel, under approval voting, alternative parties ( Greens, FDP) received considerably more votes - Share of mainstream parties fell - Conclusion: Institution and rules matter and change outcomes
How policy choices allocate resources and rights (main framework of this course!)
Image
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0263/e0263a0d79b5260a1ef5ce0072a5338ce73c6b30" alt=""
Governance unit
Institutions, with decision making powers (i.e. decision-making mode & electoral competition) → what potential effects does a certain decision-making mode have on the outcome and policies implemented Examples: Municipalities, countries, group of countries
Policies and their focus
Defined as state objectives => describes instruments that could potentially be used, e.g. CO2-certificates Can focus on: - (re)distribution, - allocate resources, - establish rights
Outcomes
- Output (what does the law specify) vs - outcomes (real impact of the policy), - enforcement, - feedback effects (what if any effects do the outcomes have over the governance unit eg decision-making mode or choice of policy)
Strategic voting
Depends on the institutional setting = majority rules vs approval voting Result: Approval voting is far less prone to strategic voting (Alos-Ferrer/Granic 2012) → big parties tend to profit from strategic voting within proportional/majority rule
Strategic voting
Depends on the institutional setting = majority rules vs approval voting Result: Approval voting is far less prone to strategic voting (Alos-Ferrer/Granic 2012) → big parties tend to profit from strategic voting within proportional/majority rule
Majoritarian system
Absolute majority of votes and of cantons/ states/ Winner takes it all, i.e. first past the post
Proportional representation system
Distribution of seats is proportional to the party’s received votes