Lesson 1: Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

Ward & Cao (2012)

A

Resources: Green taxation Show how green taxation per capita varies over time. Scandinavian countries + UK + Germany have the highest levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ward & Cao (2012)

A

Resources: Green taxation Show how green taxation varies over time . Scandinavian countries + UK + Germany have the highest levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Busch (2012)

A

Resources: Environmental policy/strategy Number of environmental policies have been steadily increasing since 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List & Sturm 2006

A

Institutions: Elections and environmental policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hainmueller & Hangartner

A

Direct democracy and naturalization decisions in Switzerland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hainmueller & Hangartner

A

Direct democracy and naturalization decisions in Switzerland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What could be possible sources of green taxation?

A

Actors: Policymakers, voters, firms Incentives – Policymakers: maximize votes – Voters: maximizes own welfare – Firms: maximize profits Policy is more progressive if: • Voters hold more green environmental ideal points • Economy is less dependent on energy-intense production • Other countries implement more progressive policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Policy/ outcome example: Immigration in Switzerland

A

− MEI: some prefer less immigration than others → why? Case highlights a different perspective: decision-making mode Electoral system → initiative: Volks- und Ständemehr (majoritarian system: absolute majority of votes and of cantons)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Aggregation of preferences

A

j

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aggregation of preferences

A

Remember: Actors have to aggregate their preferences to reach a policy decision. Take preference orders => Institution/ social choice mechanism => Collective decision/ social choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aggregation of preferences

A

Remember: Actors have to aggregate their preferences to reach a policy decision. Take preference orders => Institution/ social choice mechanism => Collective decision/ social choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Institutions

A

Consist of decision-making procedures and electoral systems Examples: - Elections and environmental policy (List/Sturm 2006) - Direct democracy and naturalization decisions in Switzerland (Hainmueller/Hangartner 20xx)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Decision making modes in environmental politics

A

Voting Bargaining Lottery • Voting: Typical way of decisionmaking in politics • However, voting is often the result of a bargaining process: vote trading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Approval voting

A

List all options, mark those that you find acceptable (“approve”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Majority rule vs. approval voting

A
  • Approval voting field experiment in German federal elections (Alos-Ferrer/Granic 2012) - In two electoral districts (Konstanz and Messel), citizens first vote officially and then unofficially using approval voting - Result: In Messel, under approval voting, alternative parties ( Greens, FDP) received considerably more votes - Share of mainstream parties fell - Conclusion: Institution and rules matter and change outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How policy choices allocate resources and rights (main framework of this course!)

A

Image

17
Q

Governance unit

A

Institutions, with decision making powers (i.e. decision-making mode & electoral competition) → what potential effects does a certain decision-making mode have on the outcome and policies implemented Examples: Municipalities, countries, group of countries

18
Q

Policies and their focus

A

Defined as state objectives => describes instruments that could potentially be used, e.g. CO2-certificates Can focus on: - (re)distribution, - allocate resources, - establish rights

19
Q

Outcomes

A
  • Output (what does the law specify) vs - outcomes (real impact of the policy), - enforcement, - feedback effects (what if any effects do the outcomes have over the governance unit eg decision-making mode or choice of policy)
20
Q

Strategic voting

A

Depends on the institutional setting = majority rules vs approval voting Result: Approval voting is far less prone to strategic voting (Alos-Ferrer/Granic 2012) → big parties tend to profit from strategic voting within proportional/majority rule

21
Q

Strategic voting

A

Depends on the institutional setting = majority rules vs approval voting Result: Approval voting is far less prone to strategic voting (Alos-Ferrer/Granic 2012) → big parties tend to profit from strategic voting within proportional/majority rule

22
Q

Majoritarian system

A

Absolute majority of votes and of cantons/ states/ Winner takes it all, i.e. first past the post

23
Q

Proportional representation system

A

Distribution of seats is proportional to the party’s received votes