LEO Essays Flashcards
LEO Battery + False Arrest would be based on what action & under what constitutional amendment?
EXCESSIVE FORCE – BATTERY/SEIZURE, 4TH AMENDMENT
A. Protection.
1) 4th amend = s&s
2) Shooting, crash.
B. Stop w/ Qualified. Discretionary, clearly estab rt (4th A)
C.
What protection shd an arrestee get from the constitution to keep him free of LEO Battery + False Arrest?
4th amendment protects search & seizure.
What is the 1st thing LG shd claim when facing 4th amendment LEO Battery + False Arrest?
Qualified immunity.
Lay out the 3 step analysis for a 4th amendment LEO Battery + False Arrest.
LEO - CONST ----------- Analysis. 1. Issue LEO = reas. 2. Std. Obj reas in-the-moment. 3. Key: Arrest permits physical.
What law must you ALWAYS include when alleging a 4th amendment LEO Battery + False Arrest?
LEO - CONST ----------- 42 USC 1983 \+ 4th amendment.
What type of fact pattern triggers a 4th amendment claim?
Excessive force (beating) & seizure (shooting/car crash/false arrest)
What constitutional claim might someone make who has been in a car chase w/ police without a crash?
14th Amend, life + liberty w/ subst dp.
What does ‘subst dp’ keep you free of?
arbitrary (egregious).
B. Stop w/ Qualified. Discretionary, clearly estab rt (4th A)
D. Pairs Well w/ State Tort – Intended to Inflict ROC to person.
What 2 laws must you ALWAYS include when alleging substantive due process?
LEO - CONST ----------- 42 USC 1983 \+ 14th amendment.
What is the 1st thing LG shd claim when facing 14th amendment subst dp?
Qualified immunity.
What are LG’s defenses to 14th Amendment, subst dp?
LEO - CONST
(1) More definite avail.
(2) Public purp, not egregious, arbitrary.
(3) Failure to assert 42 USC 1983
What type of fact pattern triggers a 14th amendment claim?
Car chase where criminal crashes himself.
What might pair well w/ a 14th amendment subst. dp claim?
Why?
State claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Why? Both subst dp + IIED require egregious conduct.
What constitutional violation might a criminal or citizen claim vs LEO’s employer?
Under what law?
LEO - CONST ----------- Failure to train. --- Sue under 1983 for INDIFFERENCE to Constitutional Rts.
What does 42 USC 1983 protect you from?
Deliberate indifference to constitutional rts.
What kind of fact pattern triggers a ‘failure to train’ claim under 42 USC 1983?
All sorts.
Crash/shooting/welfare check/beating.
State the 3 step analysis of a ‘failure to train’ claim under 42 USC 1983, i.e., what must PL show?
LEO - CONST
1) Custom or policy of inadeq training
2) Actual or constr knowledge yet deliberate indiff.
3) Delib indiff = cz of injury
What are 2 defenses to a ‘failure to train’ claim under 42 USC 1983?
LEO - CONST ----------- PL failed to show: (a) Custom or policy or (b) Delib indiff.