Leibniz: Theory of Knowledge Flashcards

1
Q

What are the principles of the universal cosmic harmony according to Leibniz?

A

mathematics and theology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Leibniz thought that the principles of logic and method of mathematics could provide the right approach for finding truth about reality. Just like Galileo, he believed that the universe is a harmonious system written in a mathematical language by God.

A

Both statements are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Descartes and Spinoza did not share the same methodological ideals. Leibniz was never satisfied with their systems.

A

First statement is false, second true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Leibniz worked for a universal perfect language which he called “a universal language”. He stated that complex arithmetic concepts can be reduced to combinations of more elementary concepts and eventually developed system of binary mathematics = all numbers may be expressed as combinations of 1s and 0s.

A

Both statements are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the methods of his task?

A

Method 1 - reduce all concepts into their elementary units

Method 2 - present them by mathematical symbols

Method 3 - formulate correct rules for combining the symbols; make the grammar of his symbolic language correspond to the logical structure of the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Leibniz reflections on epistemological matters do not rival his reflections on logic, metaphysics, divine justice, and natural philosophy in terms of quantity. He did not think deeply about the possibility and nature of human knowledge.

A

First statement is true, second false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the short treatise Leibniz had published in 1684?

A

Meditations on Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Meditations on Knowledge all about?

A

series of distinctions for human knowledge or cognition (cognito)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Knowledge is either confused or distinct. Clear knowledge is either obscure or clear.

A

Both statements are false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Distinct knowledge is either inadequate or adequate. Adequate knowledge is either symbolic or intuitive.

A

Both statements are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to Leibniz, clear knowledge means being able to recognize something that is represented to us. Knowledge is both clear and distinct when one can enumerate marks sufficient to distinguish a thing from other things.

A

Both statements are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What do you call when one can give such an enumeration where it possesses a distinct notion of a thing?

A

nominal definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If a notion is complex and we are able to consider all its component notions simultaneously, then our knowledge of it is intuitive.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Leibniz believes his distinctions also serve to show the difference between true and false ideas. According to him, “An idea is untrue when its notion is possible and true when it includes a contradiction.”

A

First statement true, second false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Since there can be no genuine causal interaction among substances, then all our ideas could come from experience. Leibniz believed that some ideas, are innate and can never be derived from sense experience, like mathematics.

A

First statement false, second true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sense experience can never provide us with certain truths. If some knowledge has these qualities, they must be innate ideas that the mind discovers within the self.

A

Both statements are true

17
Q

Leibniz expresses that no doubt that the human mind or soul is essentially immaterial. Locke’s skepticism about the nature of substance is fundamentally aligned with Leibniz.

A

First statement true, second false

18
Q

Leibniz reformulated the Lockean or empiricists’ claim that there is nothing in the intellect that was not first in the senses. He pointed out that we could never have the knowledge we have if the mind was a tabula rasa at the very beginning.

A

Both statements are true

19
Q

Leibniz distinguished between truths of reasoning and truths of fact between necessary truths only.

20
Q

Truth of facts are based on the principle of sufficient reason, which states that no fact can be real or existent, and no statement is true unless there is a sufficient reason why it is so.

A

Both statements are true

20
Q

All truths of reasoning can not be resolvable into primitives or identities. In the case of a truth of fact, its reason cannot be discovered through a finite process of analaysis.

A

First statement is true, second false

21
Q

Truths of reason are not necessary and their opposite is impossible. It is know a posteriori.

A

First statement is false, second true

22
Q

Leibniz does not disagree with Locke about the nature of mind and the possibility of innate ideas. It is also Leibniz’s contention that human beings are not capable of knowledge in a way that Locke had clearly denied.

A

First statement is true, second is false

23
Q

Leibniz holds that we can have genuine knowledge of the real essences of things. We can know certain things not only about individuals but also their species and genera.

A

Both statements are true

24