Leibniz: Theory of Knowledge Flashcards
What are the principles of the universal cosmic harmony according to Leibniz?
mathematics and theology
Leibniz thought that the principles of logic and method of mathematics could provide the right approach for finding truth about reality. Just like Galileo, he believed that the universe is a harmonious system written in a mathematical language by God.
Both statements are true
Descartes and Spinoza did not share the same methodological ideals. Leibniz was never satisfied with their systems.
First statement is false, second true
Leibniz worked for a universal perfect language which he called “a universal language”. He stated that complex arithmetic concepts can be reduced to combinations of more elementary concepts and eventually developed system of binary mathematics = all numbers may be expressed as combinations of 1s and 0s.
Both statements are true
What are the methods of his task?
Method 1 - reduce all concepts into their elementary units
Method 2 - present them by mathematical symbols
Method 3 - formulate correct rules for combining the symbols; make the grammar of his symbolic language correspond to the logical structure of the world.
Leibniz reflections on epistemological matters do not rival his reflections on logic, metaphysics, divine justice, and natural philosophy in terms of quantity. He did not think deeply about the possibility and nature of human knowledge.
First statement is true, second false
What is the short treatise Leibniz had published in 1684?
Meditations on Knowledge
What is the Meditations on Knowledge all about?
series of distinctions for human knowledge or cognition (cognito)
Knowledge is either confused or distinct. Clear knowledge is either obscure or clear.
Both statements are false
Distinct knowledge is either inadequate or adequate. Adequate knowledge is either symbolic or intuitive.
Both statements are true
According to Leibniz, clear knowledge means being able to recognize something that is represented to us. Knowledge is both clear and distinct when one can enumerate marks sufficient to distinguish a thing from other things.
Both statements are true
What do you call when one can give such an enumeration where it possesses a distinct notion of a thing?
nominal definition
If a notion is complex and we are able to consider all its component notions simultaneously, then our knowledge of it is intuitive.
True
Leibniz believes his distinctions also serve to show the difference between true and false ideas. According to him, “An idea is untrue when its notion is possible and true when it includes a contradiction.”
First statement true, second false
Since there can be no genuine causal interaction among substances, then all our ideas could come from experience. Leibniz believed that some ideas, are innate and can never be derived from sense experience, like mathematics.
First statement false, second true
Sense experience can never provide us with certain truths. If some knowledge has these qualities, they must be innate ideas that the mind discovers within the self.
Both statements are true
Leibniz expresses that no doubt that the human mind or soul is essentially immaterial. Locke’s skepticism about the nature of substance is fundamentally aligned with Leibniz.
First statement true, second false
Leibniz reformulated the Lockean or empiricists’ claim that there is nothing in the intellect that was not first in the senses. He pointed out that we could never have the knowledge we have if the mind was a tabula rasa at the very beginning.
Both statements are true
Leibniz distinguished between truths of reasoning and truths of fact between necessary truths only.
False
Truth of facts are based on the principle of sufficient reason, which states that no fact can be real or existent, and no statement is true unless there is a sufficient reason why it is so.
Both statements are true
All truths of reasoning can not be resolvable into primitives or identities. In the case of a truth of fact, its reason cannot be discovered through a finite process of analaysis.
First statement is true, second false
Truths of reason are not necessary and their opposite is impossible. It is know a posteriori.
First statement is false, second true
Leibniz does not disagree with Locke about the nature of mind and the possibility of innate ideas. It is also Leibniz’s contention that human beings are not capable of knowledge in a way that Locke had clearly denied.
First statement is true, second is false
Leibniz holds that we can have genuine knowledge of the real essences of things. We can know certain things not only about individuals but also their species and genera.
Both statements are true