Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Torts & Leg Reg > Legislation & Regulation > Flashcards

Legislation & Regulation Flashcards

1
Q

Steps of Statutory Interpretation

A

1) identify the legal issue
- identify the operative section of the act related to legal issue
2) identify the specific language in the operative section of the act or regulation related to the legal issue
3) determine whether Congress intended the language to have its ordinary or technical meaning
4) determine if the language is ambiguous
5) determine whether there is reason to reject the ordinary meaning
6) determine if intrinsic sources relate to meaning
7) determine if extrinsic sources relate to meaning
8) determine if policy-based sources relate to meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

plain meaning canon

A

directs that words and phrases shall be construed according to the commonly approved usage of the language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ordinary meaning

A

the meaning most people would give the language and is narrower that dictionary meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Places to find ordinary meaning

A

dictionaries, newspapers, literature, grammar & punctuation,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dictionary meaning

A

all ways words are used and is broader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Technical meaning canon

A

technical words and phrases have acquired a peculiar meaning and shall be construed accordingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ambiguity (easier to meet)

A

2 or more reasonable people disagree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ambiguity (harder to meet)

A

2 or more equally plausible meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Modern Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine

A

If there are two reasonable interpretations of a statute, one of which raises serious constitutional issues, and one interpretation doesn’t, the court should adopt the one that doesn’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

absurdity (harder)

A

result would shock the general moral/common sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Absurdity (easier)

A

result would frustrate purpose/intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Scrivener’s Error

A

an obvious drafting error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Reddendo Singula Singulis

A

(referring each to each)
Ex: “for money or other good consideration paid or given” -> “for money paid or good consideration given.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Doctrine of last antecedent

A

words or phrases modify only the immediately preceding noun or noun phrase in a list of items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

grammar & punctuation General Rule

A

acts are interpreted as using ordinary rule of grammar unless either contradict the ordinary meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

And v Or

A

“and” has a conjunctive meaning while “or” has a disjunctive meaning
- however, when context indicates, courts will interchange these two

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Singular & Plural

A

for ease of drafting, laws are typically written in the singular
- the legislature’s use of singular is assumed to include the plural, and vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Masculine v. feminine

A

for ease of drafting laws are typically written in the masculine
- masculine pronoun is interpreted to include the feminine or neuter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Mandatory & Discretionary

A

“shall” is mandatory
“may” is discretionary
“must” is mandatory and used when a condition precedent is present
“should” is discretionary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

In pari materia (“part of the same material”)

A

other sections or statutes in an act or code can be considered to discern the meaning of the statutory language
Whole Act- the entire act is relevant to interpretation
Whole code- acts within similar purposes may be relevant to interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Presumptions of Consistent Usage

A

When a legislature uses the same word in different parts of the same act, it intended those words to have the same meaning (identical words presumption)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Meaningful Variation

A

If the legislature uses a word in one part of an act and then changes to a different word, it intended to change the meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Noscitur a Sociis

A

“it is know from its associates”
- used for words within a list, not for the catch-all
- when a word has more than one meaning, the appropriate meaning should be gleaned from the textual context (the surrounding words in the act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ejusdem generis

A

“Of the same kind, class, or nature”
- used for general words & catch-alls, not for words within a list
- when the general words or catch-alls are near specific words or listed words, the general words and catch-alls should be limited to include only things similar to the specific words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Canon against Surplsage

A

every word, phrase, section, etc. has an independent meaning; nothing is redundant or meaningless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Expressio unius

A

(inclusion of one is the exclusion of the other)
- when the legislature includes things explicitly, courts should conclude that the legislature intentionally omitted other similar things that would have logically been included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

extrinsic sources

A

sources outside of the enacted act but within the legislative process that created the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Rule of Lenity

A

ambiguity in criminal statute resolved in the defendant’s favor.
- intended to protect defendant 5th and 14th Amendment due process right to be on notice of what they are charged for
- rule of last resort; only used if ambiguity remains after “seizing everything from which aid can be derived”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Retroactivity

A

civil statutes apply prospectively unless legislature intended retroactive application that will not impair a vest right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Youngstown (Jackson)

A

braches aligned: executive power at its fullest extent
One branch silent: invites testing boundary (zone of twilight)
branches conflict: executive power at lowest ebb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

INS v. Chadha

A
  • Sep. of Powers
  • formalist
  • one house veto violates bicameralism & presentment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

King v. Burwell

A
  • “exchange established by the state”
  • in pari materia: look at the full act purpose
    Scalia dissent: canon against surplusage and meaningful variation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Smith v. US

A

“buying drugs with a gun”
- uses dictionary meaning of “use”
Scalia-Ginsburg dissent: ordinary use of a firearm as weapon
- invokes rule of lenity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Watson v. US

A

“buying gun with drugs”
ordinary “use” does not include “receive”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

O’Conner v. Oakhurst Dairy

A

serial comma case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Steelworkers v. Weber

A
  • affirmative action case
    both sides use different legislative history
    “discrimination” as “decisions on race to harm minority”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

US v. Marshall

A

“LSD carrier”
- constitutional avoidance: didn’t find another interpretation “fairly possible,” so constitutional avoidance does not apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Yates v. US

A

tangible fish case
Ginsburg: noscitur a sociis & ejusdem generis are used to narrow the meaning of “tangible object” to mean tangible objects that are used to record or preserve information.
Alito concur.: Look at Title; tries to answer surplusage argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Holy Trinity

A

purpose/long title overrides plain meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Legislative history

A
  1. Conference Committee Report
  2. House/Senate Committee Report
  3. Earlier/Drafters of the Bill
  4. Sponsor/Drafter’s Commentary
  5. Floor Debate Statements
  6. Unenacted Bils
  7. Congressional Silence
  8. Presidential signing statements & veto messages
    - purpose or spirit of the law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Post enactment context

A
  • subsequent legislative inaction
  • stare decisis & legislative acquiescence
  • later bills and acts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

De Novo

A

default; language in other statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Formalism

A

keep branches separate
- determine the power being exercised
- determine if the appropriate branch exercises that power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Functionalism

A

Protect core functions; undue encroachment
- balance competing powers’ interests with pragmatic need for innovation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Long title, short title, section title

A
  • a component
  • Title of any kind cannot trump clear text, but titles can be relevant when text is ambiguous or absurd
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Findings clause

A

identifies the legislative facts (the mischief) that lead the legislature to enact the bill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Purpose clause

A

identifies the purpose of the bill (the remedy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Findings & Purpose Canon

A

can’t trump clear text but can resolve ambiguity and absurdity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Statutory definitions

A
  • Statutory definitions are critical and controlling
  • Statutory definition is controlling even if it makes no sense or defy common sense
  • Definitions that apply to whole act are usually placed in definitions section
    o Definitions that apply only to one section are usually placed in that section
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Exceptions and Provisos

A
  • Exceptions begin with “except for…”
  • Provisos begin with “provided that…” or “provided however…”
  • Canon is that exceptions and provisos should be narrowly construed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Harmonizing Statutes Order

A

1) specific v. general
2) later enacted
3) repeal by implication disfavored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Specific v. general

A

Specific provision construed as an exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Later Enacted

A

Newer statute viewed as clearest and most recent expression of legislative intent

54
Q

Repeal by Implication Disfavored

A

a. When a leg wants to repeal a statute, it does so explicitly
b. If there are two reasonable interpretations judge should choose the interpretation that does not repeal an existing statute or any part of it
c. If repeal unavoidable, then second statute is only repealed to the extent of the irreconcilability

55
Q

When can repeal by Implication Disfavored be overcome?

A

1) new statute comprehensively covers entire subject matter or prior statute
2) new statute is completely incompatible with existing statute

56
Q

hierarchy of legislative history

A

1) conference committee reports
2) house/senate committee reports
3) Earlier drafts of the bill
4) sponsor/drafter’s commentary
5) Floor debate comments
6) Unenacted bills
7) Congressional Silence
8) Presidential Signing Statements & Veto Messages

57
Q

Conference Committee reports

A

most persuasive evidence of congressional intent because it is generated by members of both chambers

58
Q

Earlier Drafts of the Bill

A

Including any rejected amendments
- explains what legislature intended when adopting this draft/this language

59
Q

Sponsor/Drafter’s Commentary

A

Prepared bill before it was subject to legislative manipulation; legislature likely considered the comments
- intent of whole legislature is more important than statements of individual drafters/sponsors

60
Q

Floor Debate Statements

A

Reflect only one legislator’s intent; sometimes made in empty chambers

61
Q

Presidential Signing Statements & Veto Messages

A

Lowest in hierarchy – don’t come from the legislature; subsequent executive history

62
Q

Judicial Willingness to Use Legislative History - Common

A

to determine the meaning of ambiguous and absurd text

63
Q

Judicial Willingness to Use Legislative History - Less common

A

to confirm the meaning of clear text

64
Q

Judicial Willingness to Use Legislative History - Even less common

A

to defeat the meaning of the clear text

65
Q

Constitutional Issues of Legislative History

A
  • does not go through bicameralism and presentment (Sep. of powers issue)
  • Constitution delegates lawmaking power to legislature as a whole, not to committees, individual legislators, staff members, or lobbyists.
  • Due process requires that citizens have notice of the law (text should be clear).
66
Q

Accessibility and Cost Consideration

A
  • Voluminous (non-existent)
  • Hard to find
  • Time-consuming
67
Q

Reliability Concerns

A
  • Legislators don’t read every report or attend every debate
  • Contradictory statements can often be found in the legislative history
68
Q

How to find expressed purpose

A
  • Look at text of statute: preamble, findings and purpose clauses
69
Q

How to find unexpressed purpose

A
  • Based on text, figure out the problem the statute was intended to address and what remedy the statute provided
    (4-step process heydon’s case)
    1. Determine what the law was prior to the Act
    2. Determine the problem (“mischief”) with existing law
    3. Determine the remedy that the legislature devised to fix the problem
    4. Construe the Act in a way that minimizes the mischief and furthers the remedy
  • Look at legislative history
70
Q

Using Purpose

A
  • Confirm ordinary meaning of unambiguous text (especially when judge not a textualist)
  • Resolve ambiguous text or prevent absurd outcomes, resolve scrivener’s errors, or support an interpretation that avoids a serious constitutional issue
71
Q

Subsequent legislative Inaction

A
  • super strong state decisis
  • legislative acquiescence
72
Q

super strong stare decisis

A

o Stare decisis even stronger in statutory interpretation. If legislature didn’t react to court’s interpretation, court shouldn’t alter its interpretation.

73
Q

Legislative Acquiescence

A

o Courts presume that legislature’s failure to act means, agreement with court’s interpretation

74
Q

Subsequent Legislative Action

A

o May affect the meaning of an existing act (e.g. in deciding whether Title IX allows money damages, Court looked to two subsequent acts that defined express remedies to include all forms of damages).

75
Q

Subsequent Legislative History

A
  • Canon is that subsequent legislative history should never be relevant. But sometimes, in unusual situations, there are exceptions.
76
Q

Constitutional Avoidance Counter Arguments

A

o The other side’s interpretation is not reasonable
o There aren’t any serious constitutional concerns

77
Q

Criminal Statutes apply…

A

Prospectively
- they violate the constitution’s ex post facto clause if they apply retroactively and disadvantage the defendant

78
Q

Ex Post Facto 1

A

Statutes that criminalize actions that were legal when committed

79
Q

Ex Post Facto 2

A

Statutes that alter a crime so it is categorized more severely than when it was committed

80
Q

Ex Post Facto 3

A

Statutes that increase the punishment for a crime

81
Q

Ex Post Facto 4

A

Statutes that alter the rules of evidence to make conviction easier

82
Q

When do you need a clear statement rule?

A
  • Abridge long-held individual or states’ rights; or
  • Make a large policy change
83
Q

Where are clear statement rules required?

A

1) federalism
2) Preemption
3) American Indian Treaty Rights
4) Sovereign Immunity

84
Q

Derogation Canon

A

Courts should strictly interpret acts in derogation of the common law (judge-made law)
- An act is in derogation from common law when it partially repeals or abolishes common law rights

85
Q

Remedial Purpose Canon

A

Courts should broadly interpret remedial acts
- Remedial acts create new rights or expand existing remedies

86
Q

Agency Overview

A
  • Departments
  • Executive Agencies
  • Independent Agencies
87
Q

Departments

A
  • Largest and most influential federal agencies are departments
  • Sub-agencies within each agency
88
Q

Executive Agencies

A
  • All departments and almost all agencies within departments are executive agencies
  • Serve at the discretion of the President
  • Headed by Secretaries who make up the presidential cabinet
89
Q

Independent Agencies

A
  • Freestanding; not part of any Department (more independent from the President’s influence than executive agencies)
  • Usually headed by a multi-member board from both political parties, not a single individual
  • Members can be removed for cause
  • Members serve for specific terms on a staggered basis
90
Q

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) § 5 U.S.C. § 551

A
  • Identifies the procedures that govern agencies
  • Does not include the President in the list of exceptions to what an agency is
91
Q

Statutes enacted by Congress

A
  • Agencies are founded by an “enabling” or “organic” act that defines the scope of what the agency can regulate
  • U.S. Constitution
92
Q

What Agencies do

A

Rulemaking; adjudication; investigation

93
Q

Rulemaking

A
  • Marking, amending, repealing rule (regulation)
  • involves new rule applying to large numbers of people
  • Congress enacts & codifies statutes in the U.S.C.
  • Agencies promulgate & codify regulations in the C.F.R.
  • Rule: “an agency statement of general . . . applicability and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy.”
94
Q

Adjudication

A
  • Applies existing rule to a set of acts
  • Results in an order
95
Q

Investigation

A
  • Investigating compliance of regulated entities
96
Q

Less formal agency guidance

A
  • Guidance documents, Opinion letters, Bulletins, Policy Statements, Interpretive rules. Press releases, & Amicus briefs.
97
Q

Legislative Rules

A
  • Imposing a binding requirement; have the force of the law
  • Must go through Notice and Comment Proceedings
98
Q

Non-legislative Rules

A
  1. Interpretive rules
    - How the agency will interpret the language of its regulations
  2. General statements of Policy
    - How the agencies will use its power in the future
    - Provide guidance
    - Exempt from Notice and Comment unless required by statutes
99
Q

Informal Rulemaking

A
  • Requires notice and comment procedures, publication
  • Most rulemaking is informal
100
Q

Informal Process

A
  1. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
    - Must fairly apprise interested persons of issue involved
    - Must reference legal authority under which rule proposed
  2. Public Comment Period
    - Opportunity for public to submit views
    - Changes may be made based on comments
    - No minimum time period
  3. Publication of final rule in Federal Register with “general statement of basis and purpose”
    - Must be published at least 30 days before effective date
101
Q

Formal Rulemaking

A
  • Rarely used by federal agencies
  • Requires Congress to use magic language
  • Statute must require rule to be made “on the record after opportunity for agency hearing.”
  • Requires procedures in 5 U.S.C. 556 & 557
102
Q

Adding Procedures

A

A court cannot add procedures that an agencies has to follow; only Congress can add procedures that an agency must follow (Vermont Yankee holding).

103
Q

Legislative Rules exempt from Notice and Comment

A

a. Military and foreign affairs
b. Agency management or personnel
c. Public property, loans, grants, benefits, contracts

104
Q

Procedural Rules

A

“rules of agency organization, procedure, and practice”

105
Q

Good cause exemption

A

a. Impractical
b. Unnecessary
c. Contrary to public interest
d. 30 day publication requirement can also be waived for “good cause”

106
Q

Non-legislative rules

A

a. Interpretive rules
b. Policy statements

107
Q

Formal Adjudication

A
  • Most adjudication is formal
  • Triggered by the magic language: “on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing.”
  • Trial-like procedures
    o Notice to parties
    o Agency can use an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
    o No ex parte contacts with judge
    o Separate prosecuting and adjudication functions
    o Submission of oral and written evidence
    o Cross-examination of witnesses
    o Decision must be based on entire record
  • Results in an “order” with findings of fact and conclusions of law.
108
Q

Informal Adjudication

A
  • No requirements in the APA.
  • Agencies can decide their own informal procedures.
    o E.g., Federal Student Aid; hunting & fishing license
109
Q

Agencies Investigation Powers

A
  • Subpoena power
  • power to order periodic or special reports
  • inspecting premises of a regulated entity to assess compliance with regulations or statute
  • agencies must generally get a warrant to search or inspect premises unless the entity falls into a “closely regulated” exception
110
Q

Legislative Oversight

A
  • enabling legislation
  • subsequent legislation
  • appropriations
  • hearings, investigations
111
Q

Presidential Oversight

A
  • appointment power
  • removal power
  • executive orders
112
Q

Removal power

A

president may only remove officers for cause

113
Q

Executive Order 12,866

A

forces agencies to perform “regulatory analysis” assessing the costs and benefits of major proposed regulation

114
Q

Executive Orders

A
  • executive order 12,866
  • presidential directives
  • signing statements
115
Q

Signing statements

A

courts have ignored them in statutory interpretation, but agencies are influenced by them

116
Q

Standard of Review

A

the amount of deference a court given to an agency’s interpretation or finding in reviewing of a case

117
Q

Standards of review for findings of fact and policy

A
  • arbitrary and capricious
  • substantial evidence
118
Q

Arbitrary and capricious

A

applies to informal rulemaking and informal adjudication
- whether agency’s findings were bases on a consideration of relevant factors or whether the agency made a clear error of judgment

119
Q

Substantial evidence

A

applies to formal adjudication and formal rulemaking
- whether the record contains “such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”

120
Q

Standards of Review for Questions of Law

A
  • De Novo
  • Skidmore
  • Chevron
  • Brand X
121
Q

De Novo

A

standard blank analysis for questions of law
- also used on issues of “deep economic and political significance.” (King v. Burwell)

122
Q

Skidmore

A

agency interpreting enabling statute w/ rule that does not have force of law, but it now applies to interpretations that do not have the force of law since Chevron has been over turned

123
Q

Skidmore Power to Persuade Factors

A
  • throughness evident in agency’s consideration
  • validity of its reasoning
  • consistency with earlier and later pronouncements
  • all those factos which give it the power to persuade
124
Q

Chevron

A

agency interpreting enabling statute w/ rule that has force of law
if the statute is ambiguous, courts defer to any reasonable interpretation by the agency

125
Q

Chevron 2 step test

A

1) did congress speak to the precise issue before the court?
- if yes, inquiry stops there
- if not, move to step 2
2) is the agency’s interpretation reasonable?
- if yes, then defer to the agency’s interpretation

126
Q

Brand X

A

applies when there is a prior judicial interpretation of the statutory provision at issue and the agency promulgates a legislative rule that disagrees with that prior judicial interpretation

127
Q

Brand X 2 Step Test

A

1) if prior judicial decision was made at Chevron Step 1, then it controls
- if the statute is not ambiguous, there is no gap for the agency to fill because only one interpretation can be reasonable
2) if prior judicial decision was made at Chevron Step 2, then agency’s new interpretation controls as long as it is reasonable

128
Q

Seminole Rock-Kiser

A

agency interpreting its own regulation (most deferential)
plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation
exception: if the regulation parrots statutory language, then it does not get Auer deference

129
Q

Seminole Rock-Kiser Analysis

A

1) the language at issue must be truly ambiguous after using all the tools of statutory interpretation
- if ambiguity remains, the agency’s reading must be reasonable and “Must fall within the reasonable bounds of interpretation.”
2) a reasonable agency interpretation can get deference if it meets the 4 prerequisites

130
Q
A

Torts & Leg Reg (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions