Legislation definitions etc Flashcards
What must be proved in sexual violation cases?
Must prove beyond reasonable doubt:
- There was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant and,
- the complainant did not consent to the sexual act and,
- the offender did not believe that the complainant was consenting or
- if the offender did believe the complainant was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were unreasonable.
Any investigation must prove:
- the defendant knew they did not have the victims consent but acted anyway (the offenders mens rea) or
- the defendants grounds for believing that the victim consented to the act were unreasonable
Is there a defence for spouses?
No. Spouse that sexually violates their spouse has no legal defence due to the fact that the couple are legally married. (before 1986 a man may have had such a defence)
Definition and section of rape
S128(2), CA 1961
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,
a - without person B’s consent to the connection and,
b - without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection
Definition and section of unlawful sexual connection
S128(3), CA 1961
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B,
a - without person B’s consent to the connection and,
b - without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection
Definition of sexual connection
S2, CA 1961
Sexual connection means:
a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of
- a part of the body of another person or
- an object held or manipulated by another person
b) connection between the mouth and tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus, or
c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph a or b.
What degree of penetration is sufficient?
S2, CA 1961
1A) introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Extent of the penetration is not relevant, any degree of penetration, no matter how slight or fleeting, is sufficient.
How can penetration be proven?
- the complainants evidence
- medical exam, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
- Defendants admissions
Define genitalia
S2, CA 1961
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
The genitals or genitalia include the penis and testicles of a male and the vulva and vagina of a female.
R v Koroheke relates
Define penis
S2, CA 1961
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
Is anus defined as genitalia
No it is not included in the definition of genitalia, therefore non-consensual penile penetration of the anus is not rape
Explain objects held or manipulated
Anything other than a part of the body, used by the offender to penetrate the complainants genitalia or anus, eg vibrator, deodorant bottle or other hand held objects
Penetration for medical purposes
Some medical procedures involve penetration of patients genitalia or anus by a doctor. Excluded from definition of sexual connection if it is done for genuine medical purposes.
Continuation
There is an obligation on the person to stop the sexual activity if consent is withdrawn
R v Kaitamaki relates
Is a person of any age capable of sexual connection?
S127, CA 1961
Yes, there is no presumption because of age that someone is incapable of sexual connection. It is not a defence to say they were too young or too old for sexual connection.
What is consent?
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
R v Cox relates