Legal Systems Notes From Classes; Mr Olambintan Flashcards
What is the Nigerian Legal System?
It is the whole machinery of laws that operates within the Nigerian State.
The NLS has been heavily influenced by?
Our colonial heritage (English laws make up 80 percent of our laws but despite this our legal system has not lost touch with our indigenous laws; the customary laws)
What is a legal system?
It can simply mean the aggregate of rules in a particular society at a given time together with the institutions which go with them.
It is the summation of rules in operation in a society.
It can also mean the process for interpreting and enforcing the law.
It can also be defined as the body of rules or the doctrines associated with them that have the force of the law in a given society.
What is the Nigerian Legal System?
It is the totatility of laws or legal rules and machinery which operate within Nigeria as a sovereign and independent state.
It is the whole machinery of laws that operates within the Nigerian State.
What are the features of the NLS?
Military Influence
External Influence
Duality
The System of Precedence
The Existence of Different Types of Laws
Geocultural Diversity
Fusion of the Legal Profession
The Order of Judicial Hierarchy
Discuss Duality as a feature of the NLS
The customary and English laws are still in operation within our legal system.
It is laughably sad that because of our colonial heritage, our customary laws have to be proved.
In fact there are 3 tests for validity for the customary law:
1. It must not be repugnant to natural justice
2. Not contrary to public policy
3. And not incompatible with any law being in force for the time being.
Discuss external influence as a feature of NLS
The truth remains that our laws have been greatly influenced by the English Law.
But the Nigerian Law has also borrowed heavily from other sources eg Islamic Laws.
The Criminal Code and Matrimonial Causes Act are modelled after Queensland in Australia.
The Penal Code is modelled after the Sudanese Penal Code.
Discuss Geocultural Diversity as a feature of the NLS
Nigeria is made up of so many ethnic groups which have their own customary laws that are all different from one another. The multiplicity and geocultural diversity compounds the big problem of having to prove these divergent laws. Another problem is the harmonising of these laws. An umbrella like the Common Law doesn’t exist. This heterogeneity is a distinct feature.
Discuss the system of precedence as feature of the NLS
The Nigerian Legal System’s system of precedence can also be referred to as stare decisis.
It means let the decision stand.
It allows the earlier decision to be binding on subsequent cases.
Discuss the existence of different types of laws as a feature of the NLS
There are so many diverse laws in existence and some of these laws do not have provisions for harmonisation.
Different states of the federation have different laws.
Some of these laws do not have provisions to accommodate other laws.
From the foregoing it is easy to understand that this gives way for the conflict of laws.
It may take many forms: between the English and Customary Laws, Federal and State Laws, International and Municipal Laws.
Discuss the order of Judicial Hierarchy as a feature of the NLS
The NLS adopts the Western Style of court hierarchy.
A very good illustration of this point is the recently adjudged presidential election tribunal case. The case didn’t start from the supreme Court. The other candidates have nowhere else to appeal.
Discuss the fusion of the legal profession as a feature of the NLS
Legal professionals are trained as solicitors and advocates under a unified scheme at the University level and at the Nigerian Law School.
Discuss the military influence on the NLS
The various military interventions have left some indelible marks on our legal system by practice.
Take for instance how the 1979 and 1999 constitutions were birthed by the military. The autochthonous question.
The creation of states in 1976.
(List how it made the Western Nigeria Court of Appeal Defunct that was in operation in 1967- practical illustration)
The NYSC act of 1973.
(Research more on this)
Raise the question of centralization being a direct offshoot of military influence.
The military regime implemented policies that consolidated control at the federal level. A direct result of this was the gradual erosion of the derivation principle, favouring federal control.
And a close examination of the Unification decrees shows us that they touted to unify Nigeria and feared decentralisation because of ethnic, religious and regional tensions.
Discuss the idea of law and its role in the society.
All over the world, even in the freest of societies, laws exist
Law enforcing mechanisms are put in place to regulate the way we conduct our affairs either as individuals or as corporate bodies.
It regulates our desires and also restricts state actions
It regulates and prescribes human behaviour eg Before you can drive a car, you must have a driver’s license.
It talks about your rights, structure and orderliness.
Without law enforcement agencies, societies will definitely be in disorder.
The existence of law and law enforcement machinery are necessary for the wellbeing of citizens: their freedoms, protections and rights inter alia.
What are the 4 cardinal institutions for normal life to continue?
The Law
The Courts
The Personnel of the Law
And the Administration of the Justice System
What is law?
There is no universally acceptable definition for law.
Okunniga has stated that nobody including the lawyer has offered, nobody including the lawyer is offering, nobody including the lawyer will ever be able to offer a definition of law to end all definitions.
It depends in your viewpoint.
It is a rule.
A rule or a body of rules made by insitutions, bodies and persons vested with the power to make such rules which are binding and enforced among the members of a given society or state. - Sanni
The whole reservoir of rules on which judges draw for their decisions - Max Herman Gluckman
Oliver Wendell Holmes, a major exponent of the Realist school, believed that the law should be defined as a prediction, more specifically, a prediction of how the courts behave. In other words he believes that it is whatever the courts say it is.
It is that rule of action which is prescribed by some superior and which the inferior is bound to obey- Sir William Blackstone
A command set by a superior being to inferior beings and enforced by sanctions. - John Austin in The Province of Jurisprudence Determined
Criticisms:
-Laws are not always couched in imperative language like “shall and shall not”, not all laws are commands. See rules relating to wills for instance.
-It says that the law is whatever the superior being says it is, not examining the goodness or badness of the rules laid down or the political nature or character of the lawmaker. It can be weaponised as a justification for dictatorship or totalitarianism.
-The idea of an uncommanded commander is only possible in an absolute dictatorship. Most forms of government place an emphasis on the rule of law and this connotes that not even a sovereign is above the law.
-Lastly, not everyone obeys the law because of fear of sanction. Some may agree with the law because it is logical and agree with it in principle. Eg smoking in public, murder etc.
Law is the rule which regulates how bodies and persons behave in the society.
It is a code of conduct.
What is the foundation of the various schools of thought that we have?
The existence of the very many definitions of law.
What are the definitions of law based on?
These definitions are based on the understanding and perspectives of the scholars. It is a reflection of their distinct ideas of law.
Schools of thought represent?
The scholars that define law from the same perspective.
Why do different schools of thought exist?
They exist because of the different backgrounds and orientations of the jurists, clergymen, historians, lawyers, judges, philosophers etc who have over time tried to define law.
Discuss the Natural Law School
The Natural law school espouses what is fair, just and right.
What is fair or right or just? This question is the foundation of the criticisms of this school of thought.
These concepts are highly subjective.
They see law as what flows from a supernatural or divine origin. What is just is what emanates from God.
Man is not capable of making laws that are just.
Man must be subject to the will of God because nature is just.
Though man is sinful and corrupt, he still possesses the inherent natural virtue to do what is just and fair.
They believe that before any man-made law can be valid, it must conform to certain principles.
Exponents include: St Thomas Aquinas, Grotious etc
Serves as a validity check for monarchs and present day law makers.
Basis for the development of the present day Fundamental Human Rights. They are also known as inalienable rights.
The major weakness is what is fair, right and just?
Another weakness is that it gives room for anything to be fair and just.
Discuss the Positive Law School
This school of thought defines law as what the sovereign says it is.
A first criticism; the nature of the sovereign or whoever is acting on his behalf is not taken into account.
“The uncommanded commander”
It is the direct opposite of the natural law school of thought.
They are man-made laws that do not examine the morality of the laws.
Exponents: John Austin, Hans Kelson and Thomas Hobbes.
Positive law offers the society law, order and stability.
Weakness: It doesn’t consider the political nature of the sovereign or the lawmaker.
Some sovereigns are dictators, man is naturally selfish.
A very good illustration about the pitfalls of is how this school of thought would see the laws made by Adolf Hitler during the WW2 dictating the Nazi soldiers to kill millions of people as law.
The political nature of the sovereign may make him do unfair things.
Does not recognize international law because it doesn’t emanate from the sovereign.
How then would we regulate international trade?
Discuss the Historical Law School
It defines law as a product of historical development.
It sees law as an outgrowth of the people rather than an artifical contrivance.
Law is the spirit of the people that binds them together.
Exponents: Carl Von Savigny, Gustav Von Hugo
A good understanding of the history of the people must be demonstrated before a law can be accepted and passed eg LGBTQ rights in Nigeria.
A very good example are the customary laws.
Weaknesses:.
How long must a practice have gone on for before becoming a law?
When the spirit of the people changes, at what point can we say that the way of life of the people has changed?
Law is dynamic and not static.
This school of jurisprudence will continue to have acceptability because it is based on the way of life of the people.
Discuss the Realist school
This school believes that law is what the courts will do about disputes and nothing more pretentious.
Exponents: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jeremy Frank
In order to know the law one must look not towards the books but up to the courts. Eg: The results in the FCT in this recent presidential election dispute. Section 134 (2) CFRN states: he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.
Weaknesses:
What is fair and just?
Corrupt officials
Emphasizes the uncertainty of the law and the role of the courts.
The procedures for enactments is disregarded but the pronouncements of the court is given the heaviest weight.
Discuss the utilitarian school
This school of thought is of the opinion that a proper law is the one that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people in a society.
Obvious criticism: What about the minority? Should they suffer? Are they less important?
Laws that are made by the legislature must meet this standard: meeting the needs of the majority.
Is there a possibility that the law can make everybody happy?
No, there will always be arguments for and against.
This school believes that law is for the common good eg security for all.
Jeremy Bentham- pain and pleasure are the guiding forces of human activities.
Those who violate the law must suffer because they have caused pain to the society.
Weaknesses: Focuses only on the majority of the people who are particularly favoured
Discuss the features of law
It is man-made. It is usually made by the parliament and delegated legislation according to the system of government in place in the given country.
It is not static but dynamic, it can be amended or modified.
It has territorial limitation.
It has an element of coercion, it is forceful. Breach brings about punishment.
It is a reflection of the moral state/condition of the society, it reflects the way of life of the people.
It exists in the continuum, it cannot die but may be modified.
Law is mostly codified (written) usually at the instance of the lawmakers. The ones that crystallize from customs are largely unwritten.
Law is a collection of rules, remedies and sanctions. It can also be described as a collection of do’s and don’ts
What are the functions of law?
It specifies the structure and framework for the order of all aspects of life.
It acts as an instrument for regulating society.
It establishes the administrative justice system, law enforcement agencies, the penal institutions and the correctional facilities.
It acts as a code of conduct.
It is a means of resolving disputes in a society.
It grants remedies and justice to those who have been wronged.
What are the aspects or classifications of law? These classifications are based on human view.
They can be broadly categorised into the Eternal Law, Divine Law, Positive Law and Natural Law.