Legal System of England and Wales Revision Flashcards
Applying the mischief rule of interpretation determines what mischief the statute in question was set out to remedy and interprets the statute in a way that would best achieve that result
Applying the literal rule, a court applies the dictionary meaning of a word
Applying the purposive approach a court uses extraneous material from the pre-enactment phase of legislation to try to discern the meaning of the words used in the statute
The golden rule is used when use of the ordinary meaning of words leads to absurd result
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
“expression of one thing is the exclusion of another”
If one or more things of a class are expressly mentioned then the things not mentioned are excluded
In pari materia: a rule of language that considers other statutes on the same subject to interpret the statute in question e.g using the Adoption Act to interpret the word parent in the Children Act
Conventions
A by-product of the uncodified parts of the UK Constitution. They are given great weight in the UK through acknowledgment of their existence, even though they are, strictly speaking, non-binding. Conventions form a large part of the operation of the separation of powers
The county court would be the court of first instance for a personal injury case
The Court of Appeal is bound by its own decisions in civil cases but there are exceptions to this rule. In criminal cases the Court of Appeal has a generous discretion to depart from one of its own decisions where it is convinced that the case was incorrectly decided
Conventions generally are unwritten rules regarding how things are done and are given great weight in court
The general monetary floor for civil cases to be brought in the High Court = £50,000
A decision of a High Court judge would be heard by the Court of Appeal
The Supreme Court is not subject to horizontally binding precedent i.e. not bound by it’s own earlier decisions
If a defendant is charged with two offences what is the maximum penalty in the Magistrates Court?
12 months
There may be a presumption in favour of the defendant in a criminal trial, but this is rebuttable when there is a relevant legal rule. This accords with the presumption of innocence of the defendant and the burden of proof being placed on the prosecution
When multiple judges hear a case, matter that is the ratio decidendi (that is, court statements that are essential to the court’s decision) within their unanimous decision or the majority opinion forms binding precedent. Matter that is not ratio and matter in a dissenting or non-majority opinion may be persuasive authority, but it is never binding
The County Court deals with civil cases and will hear all small claims track cases (valued at under £10,000) and most fast track cases (£10,000 to £25,000)
An Act’s citation is a reference to the year and chapter of the Act, such as “2017 Ch 22”
Conventions
By-product of uncodified constitution
Given weight through acknowledgement of their existence but are non-binding
Form a large part of the operation of the separation of powers
Presumption against allowing statutes to alter the common law
Noscitur a sociis
Word is interpreted by the company it keeps
Consider the context in which the word is used
Ejusdem generis
“Of the same type”
If a general word follows two or more specific words, the general word will only apply to items that are like the specific words used
County court track thresholds
Small claims track: up to £10,000 (up to £1,000 for personal injury)
Fast track: up to £25,000 (up to £10,000 for personal injury)
Multi track: more than £25,000
(up to £50,000 for personals injury)
Over £100,000 goes to High Court
Personal injury claims arising from road traffic accidents not exceeding £5,000 are allocated to the small claims track
Personal injury claims arising from non-road traffic accidents up to £1,000 are allocated to the small claims track
Chancery division cases
Land contracts
Trusts
Wills
Queen’s bench division cases
Personal injury and clinical negligence over £50,000
All other claims over £100,000
Administrative court: judicial review
An appeal will only be granted if there is a real prospect of success if there is another pressing reason to hear the case (civil cases)
Ratio
Reason for judge’s decision
Below the high court there is no binding power i.e crown court, magistrates court and county court
High court decisions made when the high court is acting as a court of first instance are not binding on future high court cases
High court decisions are binding in future high court cases in which the high court was acting as an appellate court
Court of appeal has discretion to depart from own decision in criminal division if it is convinced the decision was wrong and following the decision would cause hardship
Court of appeal decisions generally bind future court of appeal cases in civil cases
Supreme Court does not bind itself
Horizontal binding effect
Courts of the same level binding themselves
Stare decisis
Let the decision stand
Defendant must apply to appeal to the Court of Appeal within 28 days of sentencing
Obiter dictum
Other statements a judge may make which are not essential to reaching judgment
Not binding precedent but rather persuasive authority
Opinion of a judge in the minority
Appeals from a case heard by a District Judge in County Court is to a Circuit Judge in County Court
The High Court would hear an appeal from a decision by a Circuit Judge in the County Court or from a Master in the High Court
Complex claims should be initiated in the High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, if (1) the financial value of the claim and the amount in dispute are high; (2) the case is complex; or (3) the outcome of the case is important to the general public.
Permission to appeal must be sought from the court that heard the case initially. If the District Judge refuses, permission may be sought from the court that will hear the appeal
The facts of the case do not have to mirror the previous case to establish that a statement in the previous case is binding on the later one. They simply need to be materially the same.
A subdivision of the Queen’s Bench Division - the Administrative Court - hears applications for judicial review