Legal System of England and Wales Flashcards

[FINISHED]

1
Q

Common Law System

A

Used in England and Wales.

A legal system in which decisions about disputes are made by referring to both applicable statute and regulations AND court judgements in previous cases involving similar facts.

Adversarial system - Opposing parties offer legal arguments supporting their case and the judge serves as an umpire between them ensuring that each follows procedural rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Civil Law System

A

Used in much of Europe.

Primary focus for making decisions in legal disputes is codified statutes. Things like academic commentaries have more persuasive value.

Non-adversarial system - Judge serves as an inquisitor to draw out the facts from witnesses, and legal counsel act as umpires to ensure the judge follows procedural rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Principle of Equity

A

Possible to apply for a common law remedy or an equitable remedy in the same court.

This system allows courts to provide certain remedies (eg: injunctions) that are not available at law and that can prevent harsh results that otherwise might arise from strict application of common law principles alone.

Equitable remedies are discretionary - Conditions must be such that it is just and fair to grant the remedy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Law (name all six)

A

Public Law

Private Law

Criminal Law

Civil Law

Substantive Law

Procedural Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Public Law

A

This is the body of law relating to the functioning of the state and individuals’ relationship to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Private Law

A

This is the body of law governing relationships between individuals, for example, contract and tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Criminal Law

A

This body of law intervenes in the actions of individuals which the state (the Crown) deems harmful to the state or the people in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Civil Law

A

Civil law is the body of law that intervenes in relationships between individuals when they go awry, for example, breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Substantive Law

A

This is the law as it is which governs adjudication, for examples, the statute that provides that theft is the unlawful appropriation of property belonging to others, with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedural Law

A

This body of law governs how the adjudication of disputes operates, such as time limits, and required paperwork, for example, the Civil Procedure Rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Statute

A

The primary source of legislation in the UK. It is produced by Parliament (the body as a whole) and is formally known as ACTS OF PARLIAMENT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Structure of an “Act of Parliament” / “Public General Acts” (name all 11)

A

[Public General Acts] - Most Acts of Parliament are these, meaning they refer to the whole of the UK.

SHORT TITLE: Short name given to the Act which is most commonly used to refer to it. Eg - Offensive Weapons Act (2019)

CITATION: UK public General Acts are Chapter Acts and are fiven a chapter number which forms the method of citation. Eg - Offensive Weapons Act 2019 c.17

LONG TITLE: Describes the Act’s purpose and can be an aid to interpretation. Eg - “An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, offences relating to offensive weapons”.

DATE OF ROYAL ASSENT: The date the Act received Royal Assent and became an Act rather than a Bill.

PREAMBLE: Fixed block of text, conferring authority of the Crown upon the Act, making it law.

PART: An Act may be divided into parts to deal with subcategories.

SECTION: Individual provisions of an Act, sequentially numbered.

MARGINAL NOTES: Short notations which may appear above or alongside each section of an Act and which give insight into what the provision is about.

SUBSECTIONS: Further break down provisions into parts.

EXTENT PROVISIONS: Define the situations in which a law applies. May become complex if there are enabling provisions or if the Act concerns a devolved area of law.

ENABLING PRIVISIONS: Sometimes an Act’s provision are deferred from being in force until the relevant minister produces regulations giving that provision effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Statutory Instrument / Secondary Legislation

A

Sometimes an Act may make provision for another body, with its consent, to provide regulations to give practical effect to the Act.

The result of this delegation is a “statutory instrument” - sometimes known as “secondary legislation”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

International Treaty

A

Royal prerogative allows the executive to bind the UK to the rules of international treaties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case Law

A

Once a point of law has been determined at a binding court level, the determination becomes part of the “common law”.

This gives senior judges a law-making role that is outside the direct control of Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Works of Authority

A

I.e. Textbooks

May be used as an aid to interpretation, but they are used much less frequently than in civil law systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Conventions

A

By-product of the uncodified parts of the constitution.

They are given weight in the UK through acknowledgement of their existence, however they are strictly speaking non-binding.

E.g. Prime minister who loses a no-confidence vote is expected to step down, even if there is no law requiring that.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Literal Rule (Statutory Interpretation)

A

If the words of a statue have clear meaning, a court will apply the words as written.

However, if there is some ambiguity, the court will give words their ORDINARY meaning - even if the result is absurd.

TIP: If the words in the statue are clear, they must be applies in the way they are written, even though the intention of the legislator may have differed from the literal meaning or the judgement is harsh or undesirable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Golden Rule (Statutory Interpretation)

A

Sometimes using the ordinary meaning of a word would give an absurd result. In such cases, to avoid the absurdity, courts may use a different meaning of a word.

Exists in order to smooth out the edges of the Literal Rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Mischief Rule (Statutory Interpretation)

A

Works backwards: Looks at what problem the statute was deigned to remedy and adapts the words of the statute to achieve this result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Purposive Rule (Statutory Interpretation)

A

Accompanies Mischief Rule: Looks at WHY the statute exists as well as what it hopes to achieve.

Judges may look at things extraneous to the legislation - i.e. content of debates on the Bill and Commons briefing papers.

22
Q

Expressio Unius est Exclusio Alterius (Statutory Interpretation)

A

“Expression of one thing is the exclusion of another”.

If one or more things of a class are expressly mentioned in a statute, the things not mentioned are excluded.

23
Q

Noscitur a Sociis (Statutory Interpretation)

A

“A word is interpreted by the company it keeps”

When interpreting a statute, courts consider the context in which a word is used, thereby using words in the same section of the statute to interpret the word in dispute.

24
Q

In Pari Materia (Statutory Interpretation)

A

“Upon the same matter or subject”

Applied where other statutes may assist with interpreting an ambiguity in the statute concerned.

25
Q

Ejusdem Generis (Statutory Interpretation)

A

“Of the same type”

Used to interpret general words - If a general word follows two (or more) specific words, the general word will only apply to items that are like the specific word used.

E.g. If a law refers to automobiled. motorcycles, trucks and other motor-powered vehicles, the word “vehicles” for all purposes would relate to land-based transportation, as these vehicles were specifically listed. Therefore, an airplane would not be included in the meaning of the word “vehicles” for the purpose of this law.

26
Q

Presumptions in Interpreting Law

(name all four)

A

Presumptions are mostly unwritten and effective through observation. They are capable of being rebutted.

(1) Presumption against allowing statutes to alter the common law.

(2) Presumption against removing the court’s jurisdiction.

(3) Presumption that ambiguity in a criminal case will fall in favour of the defendant.

(4) Presumption that statutes cannot be retrospectively applied.

27
Q

Intrinsic Aid to Intepretation

A

The statute itself is the primary source of information. As a result, the statute must be read as a whole - with every word being considered - before looking outside of the statute.

Ensures judiciary are as close to intention of Parliament as possible before considering exterior factors.

28
Q

Extrinsic Aid to Interpretation

A

Aids that exist outside of the statute itself but may be used to assist in interpreting any ambiguities.

E.g. Dictionaries, explanatory notes, Hansard (official report of Parliamentary debates).

29
Q

Civil Court Structure

A

County Court

High Court

30
Q

County Court Structure

A

Part of Civil Court Structure

Generally handles claims in which the claimant is not expected to receive more than 100,000 (or 50,000 in personal injury). However, is possible for claims for more than 100,000 to start in County Court.

Presided over by CIRCUIT JUDGES or more senior DISTRICT JUDGES.

Cases put into one of three subdivisions:

(1) SMALL CLAIMS TRACK - Cases involving no more than 10,000.

(2) FAST TRACK - Cases involving no more than 25,000.

(3) MULTI-TRACK - Cases involving more than 25,000 or are too complicated for fast track.

31
Q

Small Claims Track

A

County Court - Cases involving no more than 10,000.

32
Q

FAST TRACK

A

County Court - Cases involving no more than 25,000.

33
Q

MULTI-TRACK

A

County Court - Cases involving more than 25,000 or are too complicated for fast track.

34
Q

High Court

A

Acts both as civil court of first instance (for complex Multi-Track cases and for cases involving more than 50,000) AND as an appellate court for lower value cases (and criminal case appeals).

Judges are called “Justices of the High Court” / “Judges of the High Court” / “Puisne Judges”

Divided into three sections:

(1) King’s Bench Division

(2) Chancery Division

(3) Family Division

34
Q

Chancery Division

A

High Court

Deals with land contracts, trusts, and wills.

34
Q

King’s Bench Division

A

High Court

Deals with Multi-Track claims for all common civil law actions.

Claim value exceeds 50,000 for personal injury claims and criminal negligence.

Claim value exceeds 100,000 for other types of claim.

Contains ADMINISTRATIVE COURT - Deals with applications for judicial review against decisions made by the government on legal grounds.

35
Q

Family Division

A

High Court

Cases concerning family proceedings.

I.e. Adoption, complex divorce, nullity of marriage, dissolution of civil partnerships.

36
Q

Alternatives to Civil Courts

A

Mediation

Arbitration

Negotiated Settlement

37
Q

Mediation

A

Most common version of ADR.

Involves use of a third party to guide that parties in the dispute to resolve the sitiation themselves.

Parties make the decision how to resolve their dispute, mediator does not issue a ruling.

Keeps parties out of the courtroom and is better for maintaining relations.

38
Q

Arbitration

A

Parties appoint a third party (arbitrator) to decide their dispute.

Arbitrator discusses case individually with each party and then makes a decision (“FINAL ORDER”) which is enforceable in courts.

More adversarial than mediation - Therefore may be less effective in long-term as mediation as it does not maintain relations.

39
Q

Negotiated Settlement

A

Parties negotiate with each other and agree how to settle their dispute.

Avoids use of court systems or third party.

Cost and time effective - Should be first consideration for most solicitors.

40
Q

Criminal Court Structure

A

All cases start in Magistrates’ Court - Then depending on SEVERITY, will be tried in one of two courts:

(1) Magistrates’ Court - Less severe offenses (“Summary Offenses”) tried without a jury.

(2) Crown Court - More severe offenses (“Indictable Offenses”) tried with a jury.

“Either-Way Offenses” tried in Magistrates’ Court if the defendant agrees to be tried without a jury - Otherwise trial will be transferred to Crown Court.

41
Q

Magistrates’ Court

A

Criminal Court

Less severe offenses (“Summary Offenses”) tried without a jury.

Comprised of three “lay magistrates” who are not legally qualified OR the courts are made up of full-time district judges.

Maximum sentence is six months and/or a fine of any amount.

42
Q

Crown Court

A

Criminal Court

More severe offenses (“Indictable Offenses”) tried with a jury.

“High Court Judges” and “Circuit Judges” preside. Simpler cases may be presided over by “recorders” (barristers/solicitors in private practice serving as part-time judges).

Jury comprised of selection of people between 18-75 from electoral register. Listen to evidence and determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty.

43
Q

Routes to Appeal (Civil)

A

Access to Justice (Destination of Appeals) Order 2000

Two factors in deciding where an appeal will be heard:
(1) The seniority of the judge presiding over the original case;
(2) The court in which the judge sat when reaching the decision that is being appealed.

General rules summary:

  • If a case starts in County Court, cases heard by a “district judge” (small claims track) will be head again at County Court by more senior “circuit judg”e. From there may go to High Court, then Court of Appeal.
  • Other cases go straight to High Court for appeal, then on to Court of Appeal.
  • If a case starts in High Court, it will move to Court of Appeal, further appeal to Supreme Court.
  • Occasionally if there is public significance (statutory interpretation) may pass from High Court to Supreme Court, bypassing Court of Appeal.

Permission must be sought from the court that made the initial judgement. If permission is refused, may appeal for permission to the court to which the case will be appealed.

Appeal only granted if:

(1) The claim looks to have a real prospect of success; or
(2) There is another pressing reason to hear the case.

44
Q

Routes to Appeal (Criminal)

A

Crown court - Hears both appeals against sentence and appeals against verdict. Once a verdict has been reached, can only hear appeals against verdict and not the original sentence.

High Court - Either party (crown or defendant) can apply to High Court to hear appeal on grounds that a Magistrate has incorrectly applied procedure. Panel of three judges reviews the judgement.

Administrative Court - Either party can appeal to Administrative Court if they feel the process of the judgement was incorrect and the court acted ULTRA VIRES (beyond scope of powers).

Court of Appeal - Convicted party can appeal to Court of Appeal either the conviction or the sentence. Must be done within 28 days of conviction. Otherwise, if there is fresh evidence, may submit appeal to Criminal Cases review Commission (CCRC) to have case reheard.

Supreme Court - Permission given and point of law is of public importance.

45
Q

Vertical Binding Effect

A

Precedent works top-down: Rulings of higher courts bind the lower courts.

Decisions of Supreme and Court of Appeal bind courts below them; Decisions of High Court and Crown Court bind courts below them.

46
Q

Horizontal Binding Effect

A

Concerns courts of the same level binding themselves by their decisions. More contentious than vertical binding effect.

GENERAL RULE:
If a judge is sitting in a court of “coordinate jurisdiction” (a court of the same level that made a decision in a previous case), they should follow that decision unless there are “cogent” (convincing) reasons for not doing so. If there are conflicting decisions of coordinate jurisdiction, then the latter decision should be followed.

Supreme Court - Does not bind itself in its decisions.

Court of Appeal - Civil Division: Binds itself in future decisions. Criminal Division: Has discretion to depart from previous decisions if convinced the decision was wrong and following it would cause hardship.

High Court - Acting as appellate court: Binding on future High Court decisions. Acting as court of first instance: Not binding on future High Court decisions.

Lower First Instance Court - No binding effect.

47
Q

Ratio Decidendi

A

“The Ratio”

The part of the court’s decision which is binding.

Made up of the parts of the case which are essential to the court’s decision: The facts, laws, and interpretation of the laws on which the court based its ruling.

48
Q

Obiter Dictum

A

Other statements a judge may make in the summation - items included withing the case discussion which are not actually essential to reaching the conclusion that was reached.

i.e. discussion of how the court would have rules if the facts were different.

Not binding precedent, however because it is informative of how the court might rule in other circumstances, it may be used as persuasive authority.

49
Q

Unanimous / Non-Unanimous Judgements (Binding)

A

If multiple judges hear a case and:

The all agree (Unanimous Judgement) - The decision is binding.

There is disagreement (Non-Unanimous Judgement) - Ratio from majority opinion is considered binding. Minority opinion is never binding but may be used as persuasive authority.