Legal rights Flashcards
Lecture 04
1
Q
Cameron’s Trs v Maclean
A
- What does a relict take?
i. Items in the house to the value of his claim?
ii. A pro indiviso share of all the contents?
iii. Money based on the value of the contents? - This case held that the answer is money based on the value of the contents
- Jus relictae is simply treated as a debt
2
Q
MacGregor’s Exr v MacGregor’s Trs
A
- “The relict and the bairns are heirs among creditors and creditors among heirs” (per LP Clyde)
- “Relict and the bairns are heirs among creditors” means that legal rights are only available as regards the net estate (what remains of the deceased’s estate after debts)
- “Creditors among heirs” means that legal rights take priority over many succession claims on the net estate (but, not all now)
3
Q
Stewart v Bruce’s Trs
A
- People must be given time to consider whether to claim their legal rights or not
4
Q
Naismith v Boyes
A
- If partial intestacy legal rights can be claimed in relation to an intestate estate and a legacy then a person can claim the legacy and legal rights over the intestate part of the estate
5
Q
Coat’s Trs v Coats
A
- If there is only one claimant, no collation is required
6
Q
Harley v Harley’s Executrix
A
- Concerned a claim brought by the son after he was left out of the deceased’s will
- This was a complex and advanced case about valuation of the shares forming the legitim fund, but a good illustration of the fact these claims still happen and can be substantial (figures mentioned in this case were of a share around £220,000)