Legal Remedies Flashcards
Legal Remedies
The result
The result is a Judgment
Not a court order
Not backed by jail time
Legal Remedies
Types of damages
- Compensatory
- General damages
- Special damages
- Nominal
- Punitive
Why are nominal damages important?
Nominal damages are small because P failed to prove that there is legally compensable harm.
BUT, they allow you to get
- attorney’s fees
- punitive damages
Can compensatory damages be punitive?
Compensatory damages are only compensation for injury to P. It focuses on P’s harm.
It is not punitive damages if compensatory award is “too large”
Compensatory Damages
General
- you get “market value”
- For everyone who has brought this type of action
- General damages are for direct harm
Compensatory: Special Damages
Elements
What must you show to get special damages?
- Particular to this P
- Must be foreseeable
- Proven to a reasonable certainty
- existence of harm
- existence of loss
- magnitude: not too speculative
Compensatory: Special Damages
Must prove what to a reasonable certainty?
Must prove
- Existence of harm
- Existence of loss
- Magnitude of loss
- “Not too speculative”
Compensatory: Types of Special Damages
Tort Cases
Tort:
- Economic damages
- Medical expenses
- Lost wages
Compensatory Damages:
Do I choose Contract or Tort?
Consider:
- Statute of Limitations (could be different)
- Punitive damages (not in contract)
- Emotional distress (usually not in contract)
Interest
Pre and post
- Should P be compensated for
- The time it took to win the case?
- Pre-judgment interest
- The time it took D to pay after the judgment?
- Post-judgment interest
- The time it took to win the case?
- Courts compound annually.
Post-judgment interest
Fed & California Interest rates
- Fed courts: mandatory!
- But interest rate is crazy low… tracks treasury bill interest
- CA courts: mandatory!
- 10% per anum, simple interest
Pre-judgment interest
Fed courts
Which rule applies to determine if interest is added?
Diversity case: apply state rule about application of interest.
Fed Q case: apply fed rule (which is at the discretion of the judge and they often apply the state rule)
Pre-Judgment Interest
California
When do cases get pre-judgment interest?
What is the rate for contract vs tort?
Only when damages are certain
The rate:
- Contract cases
- Look at the contract for the amount; OR
- Default 10% simple
- Tort cases
- 7% simple per the California constitution
Defense to damages:
Collateral source rule
Don’t tell the jury about ways in which 3rd parties have compensated P
- The 3rd party is usually insurance; but applies to
- Charity
- Services donated
- Any 3rd party giver
Policy of collateral source rule
(defense to damages)
- Encourages purchase of insurance
- Protects attorney’s fees
- Tortfeasor deterrence
- Negative: results in double recovery
- BUT if insurance has subrogation clause, they get back the money they paid out . So it’s NOT always a double recovery when insurance is 3rd party.
Collateral Source Rule (defense)
Government Provided assistance
A minority does not apply the CSR when the benefits are “free”
- Medicaid, Snap, public school, special ed
If the benefits are “paid for”, the CSR is applied
- Social security (paid for by payroll taxes)
- VA benefits (paid for with service)
- Medicare (payroll)
Can a statute change the Collateral Source Rule?
Yes
Collateral Source Rule (defense)
Contracts cases
Majority vs Minority
Majority: CSR applies
Minority: does not apply. Info about 3rd party reimbursement allowed.
Defense to damages: Offset the benefits rule
If the damages caused also brings benefit, the award is the net of harm minus benefit.
Defense to damages: Mitigation
Personal Injury
P has a duty to reasonably mitigate damages
Torts: Personal injury
- Duty to mitigate by getting surgical / medical care.
- UNLESS
- Risk to life
- Unreasonable suffering
- Not a reasonable likelihood of success
- UNLESS
Punitive Damages
When are they available?
In general, only available when compensatory damages are awarded
Exception: for intentional torts, nominal damages can support a punitive award
Limits on Punitives
Constitutional
(at the outside)
The test
14th amendment keeps the award from being “arbitrary or grossly excessive”
Test:
- How reprehensible is D’s conduct
- Ratio of punitive to compensatory damages
- How does it compare to criminal sanctions?
Limits on Punitives
Constitutional (at the outside)
The test: 1. How reprehensible is D’s conduct
- Physical harm is worse than economic harm
- Intentional is worse than reckless
- Repeatedly is worse than once
D’s conduct towards others besides P cannot be taken into account
- Other people’s punitive damages should go to the other people, not this particular P.
Limites on Punitives
Constitutional (at the outside)
- Ratio of punitive to compensatory damages
- Greater than 10:1 … probably a violation
- 3:1 … probably ok
- In the middle… ?
Limites on Punitives
Constitutional (at the outside)
- How does it compare to criminal sanctions?
This is a sanity check
Only look at conduct towards this particular P
Limits to punitives
state statutes
- No punitives: Nebraska and the rest of the world
- No punitives… unless allowed by statute.
- Yes punitives… but caps
- $$ maximums (eg $500k)
- Max ratio caps
- Both of these
- Or neither, if there is an intentional tort on a person
- Yes punitives… to constitutional max
Limits to Punitives
Common Law
Court might decide common law cap on punitives
For example, fed maritime law… 2:1 damages cap
Punitives in Contract law
Liquidated damages are not enforceable if deemed punitive
Liquidated damages are enforceable if the amount varies w/severity of the breach. Not usually enforceable if a lump sum.
Watch recording about nuisance
look it up and watch it
Cause of action: Unjust enrichment.
Remedy: restitution
Elements
Unjust enrichment elements
- D got a benefit; was enriched
- At the expense of the P
- Unjust for D to keep the benefit
Flavors of unjust enrichment
- Quasi-contract
- Quantum meruit
- Contract-implied-in-law
Unjust enrichment
Legal / contract
What is the benefit, usually?
Often the benefit is a service.
P wants to be paid for it
Unjust enrichment
Constructive trust
- Benefit conferred to D is some specific property or pot of money
- P wants D to give it back
- If comingling of funds:
- P can get a constructive trust if the money is traceable.
- Appreciation goes to P. Losses go to D.
- P gets pro-rata share of comingled funds.
- Constructive trusts are a good idea if there has been appreciation. Otherwise, use conversion and get face value.