Legal Reasoning Flashcards

0
Q

Problems with Deductive Reasoning

A

Does not mean a valid conclusion, the truth of the premises is a separate matter.
Formal fallacy - an error in logical structure leading to an invalid conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Structure of Deductive Reasoning

A

Major premise, minor premise then conclusion.

Modus ponens - if X then Y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Inductive Reasoning

A

Invites a generalisation from a particular proposition (past case) which can be extended to the current case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Problems with Inductive Reasoning

A

Less certain than deductive reasoning, works to a degree of probability. There is no automatic truth to the propositions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Analogical Reasoning

A

Researching relevant law and arguing that the current case is analogous (relevantly similar) or disanalogous (in some crucial respect it differs).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Problems with Analogical Reasoning

A

There is often no precise science to identifying an unquestionable argument for or against the application of your argument, persuasion is necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly