Legal & Psych Flashcards
5 exceptions to doctor-patient confidentiality
- when sharing info w/ staff who is also treating patient
- if subpoenaed
- if child abuse is suspected
- if patient is an immediate danger to others
- if patient is suicidal
Tarasoff Duty
obligation of a physician to report patients who are potentially harmful to others
in order to make informed decisions, the patient must be given the following info for informed consent:
NARCC: Name/purpose of treatment, Alternatives, Risks/benefits, consequences of refusing, capacity
three situations that do not require informed consent
lifesaving medical emergency, suicide or homicide prevention, minors
informed consent for treatment of minors is not required from parents in what three situations
Obstetrics, STDs, substance abuse
competence v. capacity
competence is a legal term and can only be decided by a judge, capacity is a clinical term and may be assessed by physicians.
capacity is “task specific”
can fluctuate over time. may have capacity to make one treatment decision but not others
four criteria for decisional capacity
- can communicate a choice or preference
- understands the relevant information regarding treatment- purpose, risks, benefits, and alternatives; patient must be able to explain this information to you
- appreciates the situation and its potential impact or consequences according to his or her own value system and understands the ramifications of refusing treatment
- can logically manipulate information regarding the situation and reach rational conclusions.
most important factor in assessing patient’s risk of violence
hx of violence
4 criteria to be competent for trial
understand charges against them, have ability to work with attorney, understand possible consequences, be able to testify
to be found not guilty by reason of insanity
must have mental illness, not understand right from wrong, and not understand consequences of actions at the time the act was committed.
M’Naghten criteria
most stringent test and is standard in most jurisdictions. assess whether the person understands the nature, consequences, and wrongfulness of his or her actions.
American law institute model penal code
determines whether the person understands the wrongfulness of his or her actions and whether he or she is able to act in accordance with the law
Durham criteria
this is the most lenient test and is rarely used. assesses whether the person’s criminal act has resulted from mental illness
to successfully argue a case of malpractice against a physician, the patient must prove what three conditions
an established standard of care, physician breached his or her responsibility to the plaintiff, physician’s breach of responsibility caused injury or damage to the plaintiff