Legal foundations Flashcards

1
Q

Equality

A

Definition-
All people engaging in the justice system should be treated in the same way; if the same treatment creates disparity or disadvantage, measures should be implemented to allow engagement without said disadvantages.

Same treatment: Formal equality ( same treatment no matter what)

Different treatment: substantive equality (implemented measures to ensure fair outcomes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fairness

A

Definition-
All people can participate in the justice system and its processes should be impartial and open.

Includes:
-Impartial processes (all members of process can’t show bias ect)

-Open processes (allow media, open courts)

-Participation (time to prepare case, Understand charges ect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Access

A

Definition-
All people should be able to engage with the justice system and its processes on an informed basis.

Engagement: physical and financial access.

Informed basis: education, Access to legal support, Legal representation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CCharacteristics Of An Effective Law

A

1) Reflects Society’s Value
2) Enforceable
3) Known
4) Clear and understandable
5) Stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Structure of Commonwealth Parliament

A

(Parliament Of Australia or Federal Parliament)

Consists of:
-The King/ Crown (rep by GG)
- House of Reps
- Senate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

House of representatives

A

(Lower house, Peoples house)

-Made up of 151 members (voted in by each electorate) every 3 years
- Party with majority votes= Government (prime minister, Cabinet ect)
- 2nd majority= opposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Senate

A

(upper house, States)

Consists of 76 Senators
- Each states gets 12 members, each territory gets 2.
- They scrutinize/ Review proposed bills and can propose them

( cannot propose bills on money)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Governor-General

A

Representative of the Crown- Approves the bill before it becomes a law (grants Royal Assent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Statute law

A

Law made and passed by parliament.
( has passes through both houses and Royal assent)
- It overrides other laws made by other bodies (eg court)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Structure of Vic parliament

A

Made up of the:
-Crown (rep by Governor)
- Legislative Assembly ( lower)
- Legislative Council (upper)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Legislative Assembly

A

88 members elected for 4 years.
- Party with most members= Government and Premier ( who chooses minister)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Legislative council

A

40 member (8 regions each electing 11 members)
- Scrutinizes and debates bills passed by lower
- Can introduce bills.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Subordinate Authorities

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Common Law

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Doctrine of Precedent

A

Legal principle established by judges that should be followed by courts when similar cases arise. STARE DECISIS ( stand by what’s been decided)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Binding Precedent

A

Precedent set by courts that MUST be followed by lower courts in the same court hierarchy with cases with similar material facts.

17
Q

Persuasive Precedent

A

Doesn’t Have to be followed. Can be set by other court hierarchy, Lower court or same court.

18
Q

Ratio Decidendi

A

’ The reason for the decision’
- Binding part of the judgement that must be followed by other courts

19
Q

Obiter Dictum

A

‘By the way’
-Persuasive parts of judgement (suggestions, comments)

20
Q

Methods of Developing/Avoiding Precedent

A

Distinguishing- Material facts in new case are sufficiently different from other case.

Overruling- Higher court states precedent (set by lower) no longer applies when dealing with a different case. This then becomes binding.

Reversing- Same case is appealed, higher court changes the lower courts decision ( becomes binding precedent)

Disapproving- Follows binding precedent but expresses disagreement in the Obiter Dictum.

21
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson

A

A decomposed snail found in ginger beer in Uk cafe. The manufacturer was found to not fufill a duty of care as stated in the ratio Decidendi and therefore found liable. This case set up the persuasive precedent for australian courts on matters of negligence and duty of care.

22
Q

Statutory Interpretation

A

Judges are called upon to interpret the meaning of word in a statute law and applying it to cases when presented in court.

23
Q

Codification

A

Parliament can make legislation that codifies (reinforces, confirms) precedent set by a court.

24
Q

Abrogation

A

Parliament can make legislation that abrogates (overrides, abolishes) a common law principle.

25
Q

Judicial Influence

A

In their judgements, courts may influence parliament to change the law by commenting on a need for reform.