Legal Ethics (NSW) Flashcards
The statutory regime of Legal Professional Ethics in NSW. Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015, Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW),
Where can the following be found?
A solicitor must, at the appropriate time in the hearing of the case if the court has not yet been informed of that matter, inform the court of
- any binding authority,
- where there is no binding authority, any authority decided by an Australian appellate court, and
- any applicable legislation,
known to the solicitor and which the solicitor has reasonable grounds to believe to be directly in point, against the client’s case.
Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015:
Rule 19.6
A solicitor who becomes aware of matters within Rule 19.6 after judgment or decision has been reserved and while it remains pending, whether the authority or legislation came into existence before or after argument, must inform the court of that matter by:
- 19.8.1 - a letter to the court, copied to the opponent, and limited to the relevant reference unless the opponent has consented beforehand to further material in the letter, or
- 19.8.2 - requesting the court to relist the case for further argument on a convenient date, after first notifying the opponent of the intended request and consulting the opponent as to the convenient date for further argument.
Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015
19.9?
19 Frankness in court
19.9 - A solicitor need not inform the court of any matter otherwise within Rule 19.8 which would have rendered admissible any evidence tendered by the prosecution which the court has ruled inadmissible without calling on the defence.
Where in the conduct rules is the following found?
“A solicitor must not deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead the court.”
Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015
19 Frankness in court
Rule 19.1
Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015
Rule 19.11?
A solicitor must inform the court of any misapprehension by the court as to the effect of an order which the court is making, as soon as the solicitor becomes aware of the misapprehension.
LPULSCR 2015, Rule 19.2?
A solicitor must take all necessary steps to correct any misleading statement made by the solicitor to a court as soon as possible after the solicitor becomes aware that the statement was misleading.
LPULSCR 2015, Rule 19.3?
A solicitor will not have made a misleading statement to a court simply by failing to correct an error in a statement made to the court by the opponent or any other person.
LPULSCR 2015, Rule 19.12?
19 - Frankness in Court
A solicitor must alert the opponent and if necessary inform the court if any express concession made in the course of a trial in civil proceedings by the opponent about evidence, case-law or legislation is to the knowledge of the solicitor contrary to the true position and is believed by the solicitor to have been made by mistake.
LPULSCR Rule 19.4?
A solicitor seeking any interlocutory relief in an ex parte application must disclose to the court all factual or legal matters which:
- 19.4.1 are within the solicitor’s knowledge,
- 19.4.2 are not protected by legal professional privilege, and
- 19.4.3 the solicitor has reasonable grounds to believe would support an argument against granting the relief or limiting its terms adversely to the client.
A solicitor who has knowledge of matters which are within Rule 19.4:
19.5.1 - must seek instructions for the waiver of legal professional privilege, if the matters are protected by that privilege, so as to permit the solicitor to disclose those matters under Rule 19.4, and what?
What happens after, if the client does not waive the privilege as sought by the solicitor?
- (i) must inform the client of the client’s responsibility to authorise such disclosure and the possible consequences of not doing so, and
- (ii) must inform the court that the solicitor cannot assure the court that all matters which should be disclosed have been disclosed to the court.
LPULSCR (NSW) 2015
Rule 19.5.2
- Under 19.5.2: The Solicitor must:
- (i) must inform the client of the client’s responsibility to authorise such disclosure and the possible consequences of not doing so, and
- (ii) must inform the court that the solicitor cannot assure the court that all matters which should be disclosed have been disclosed to the court
LPULSCR (NSW) 1995
Under rule 20.1, what must the solicitor learn to prompt action of 20.1.4 and 20.1.5?
- LPULSCR (NSW) 1995 Rule 20.1:
- Where LP learns, during hearing or after judgement, or decision is pending, that C,
- 20.1.1 – has lied, or procured another to lie to court, or
- 20.1.2 – has, or has procured another to falsify documents tended, or
- 20.1.3 – has, or has procured another to suppress evidence when there was a positive duty to disclose to court,
- LP must so specified, as per 20.1.4 and 20.1.5
- Where LP learns, during hearing or after judgement, or decision is pending, that C,
What must the solicitor do upon learning of the client’s, or procurement by another by the client’s, lie, falsification, or suppression?
As per LPULSCR (NSW) 2015
- 20.1.4 – Solicitor must advise the client that the court should be informed on the lie, falsification, or suppression and request authority from the client to inform the court.
- 20.1.5 – Solicitor must refuse to take further part on the case unless C authorises Solicitor to inform the court of the lie, falsification, or suppression.
- The solicitor must then, on the authority of the client, inform the court
- Otherwise, Solicitor may not inform the court without the client’s authorisation.
- If the client denies the request, by their solicitor, to disclose the lie, falsification, suppression to the court, the solicitor must do what?
- Also cite case Authority
- Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Cowley [2010] QSC 65 at [130]–[132] per Atkinson J:
Solicitor mus withdraw from case but is not permitted to disclose the lie, falsification or suppression.
- LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 20.3.1 and 20.3.2 summarised?
- An LP whose C discloses an intention to disobey a court order must advise against that course and warn of its dangers and not advise how to carry out or conceal that course.
LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 20.3.3 summarised?
- Client’s intention to disobey court order
- Where Client informs the solicitor an intention to disobey court order:
- solicitor must not inform court or Client’s opponent of intention, unless:
- authorised by the client, OR
- solicitor believes Client’s conduct is a threat to anyone’s safety
- solicitor must not inform court or Client’s opponent of intention, unless:
- LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 25
- What is this rule summarised?
- Rule 25 - Integrity of evidence—two witnesses together
- A lawyer should not confer with, or condone another lawyer conferring with more than one lay witness at the one time, about any issues the lawyer believes may be contentious at a hearing and count be affected by, or may affect, evidence the witness may give.
- LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 24.1.1? Summarised
24 Integrity of evidence—influencing evidence
- 1 A solicitor must not:
- 1.1 advise or suggest to a witness that false or misleading evidence should be given nor condone another person doing.
LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 24.1.2? Summarised
- 1 A solicitor must not:
- 1.2 coach a witness by advising what answers the witness should give to questions which might be asked.
LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 24.2
- Lawyer does not breach 24.1 by:
- 24.2.1 – expressing a general admonition to tell the truth
- 24.2.2 – questioning and testing the version of evidence to be given by the witness, or
- 24.2.3 – drawing the witness’s attention to inconsistencies or difficulties of the evidence, but the solicitor must not encourage the witness to give evidence that is different from what the witness believes.
LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 26.1.1
A solicitor must not confer with any witness (including a party or client) called by the solicitor on any matter related to the proceedings while that witness remains under cross-examination
LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 26.1.2
- 1 - A solicitor must not confer with a witness under cross-examination UNLESS
- 1.2?
- the Solicitor:
- (i) believes on reasonable grounds special circumstances require a conference with the witness,
- (ii) the solicitor informs the cross-examiner before LPs intention to do so, AND,
- (iii)otherwise informs the cross-examiner as soon as possible after doing so.
- LPULSCR (NSW) 2015 – Rule 23.1:
- A solicitor must not discourage a witness from conferring with an opponent or be interviewed by a person involved in proceedings.