Legal Cases Flashcards
Wyatt V. Stickney
1972 - fed court established minimum standard of care provided by hospitals
Wyatt mentally retarted man sued Stickney (commissioner of mental health in Alabama) over conditions in facility
Fed Court ruled hospital failed to provide adequate living conditions, and treatment
Established patients rights: right not to be required to perform work in maintaining facility, hospitals must at a minimum provide:
- a humane psychological and physical environment
- Qualified staff in numbers sufficient to administer adequate treatment
- Individualized treatment plans
O’Conner V Donaldson
1975 - Donaldson involuntarily confined for 14 years without receiving treatment - no diagnosis and posed no threat to himself or others
Court Ruled: “mental illness (alone) cannot justify a states’ locking a person up against their will and keeping them indefinitely” person must pose a danger to themselves or others
Youngberg V Romero
1982 - 33 year old with severe retardation, highly mistreated often held in restraints- mother brought case on alleging hospital negligent in his care
Court ruled: involuntary committed patients have right to be confined in less-restrictive conditions whenever it is reasonable to do so
Rogers V Okin
Feds ruled: a patient may be unwise to refuse medication, but a patient with or without a mental disorder has the right to exercise bad judgment so long as the effects of the “error” do not impose “a danger of physical harm to him/herself, fellow patients, or hospital staff
Tarasoff V Regents of University of California
Duty to warn: Therapist’s obligation when their clients show the potential for violence making threats against others
Durham V United States
The accused person in not criminally responsible if his/her unlawful act the product of mental disorder/mental defect
Juries expected to decide not only whether accused suffered from a mental disease/defect but also whether mental condition causally connected to criminal act
Jones V United States
individuals acquitted by reason of insanity “constitute a special class that should be treated differently” from civilly committed individuals
people found not guilty by reason of insanity may remain confined to a mental hospital may remain confined to a mental hospital longer than if they were found guilt and sentenced to prison