legal and juror decision making Flashcards

1
Q

county court

A

no jury, tries only civil cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

magistrates court

A

3 magistrates, no jury, tries summary offences. Passes most indictable offences to crown court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

crown court

A

Judge and 12 Jury members, tries indictable offences and appeals magistrate verdicts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

bench trial

A

Judge only. Permissible under the criminal justice act of 2003 for “real and present” danger of jury tampering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe an adversarial legal system

A

comprises of prosecution and defence
impartial judge, passive adjudicator who decides on points of law and sentencing
prosecution heard first burden of proof on the accuser
judge or jury attempts to make a finding of fact based upon evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe an inquisitorial legal system

A

no jury except in major cases,

lay assessors collect evidence for and against the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the role of a judge

A
  1. pre-trial decisions
  2. determine admissibility of evidence
  3. supervises jury selection
  4. directs jury
  5. in charge of court proceedings
  6. sums up the evidence at the end before the trial
  7. determines the sentence of the defendant if found guilty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

As per the Mental Health Act 1983 (amended 2017)

what is the criteria that must be met to determine mental competency

A

the ability to understand that jurors may be challenged
the ability to comprehend the details of the evidence
the ability to understand the implication of the charges
the ability to instruct lawyers effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the difference between Actus Reus and Mens Rea

A

Actus Rea- the guilty act
Mens Rea- the guilty mind
intent must be present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

N.G.R.I

A

not guilty by reason of insanity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain mentally disordered offender

A

the CPs uses the term mentally disordered offender
A mental disorder may be relevant to: The decision to prosecute or divert; Fitness to plead; and Sentencing/Disposal. Defendant may be compulsory detained in a secure hospital to determine their mental fitness to stand trial. See

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain diminished responsibility

A

defence used in murder cases:
requires proof of substantially impaired mental responsibility
if guilty- convicted of man slaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

jury decision making process

how do psychologists gather evidence

A

post deliberation interviews or surveys of real jurors
not possible to manipulate variables

mock jury
ability to manipulate experimental variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the psychology of individual decision making

A

Devine 2001- jurors don’t make decisions in the manner expected by the courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What do jurors base their decisions on

A

their past experience (scripts and Schemas)
their stereotypes
their personal beliefs and values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the story model

A

Pennington 1991
jurors evaluate conflicting information and construct a story that provides a plausible explanation of evidence
by filtering information through their experiences
they often include evidence that was only inferred
therefore influence of schemas cognitive heuristics and emotions

17
Q

Give examples of stereotypes in juror decision making

A

attractive men were considered less likely to have committed murder and armed robbery Saladin 1998
attractive people viewed more sympathetically by judges when found guilty Wuensch 1991
jury more lenient towards their own religion Kerr 1995
white jurors more likely to find a black defendant guilty than black jurors Abshire 2003

18
Q

Explain attribution theory

A

jurors make decisions about why people do things
Heider, 1958
people explain the behaviour of others in terms of disposition and explain their own behaviour in terms of situational factors

19
Q

explain the fundamental attribution error

A

Russ- jurors overestimate dispositional factors and underestimate situational factors

20
Q

explain just world theory

A

the extent to which people see the world as a just and fair place

21
Q

pollard 1992

A

females make more pro-victim judgements than males

the more provocatively dressed and the more sexual partners the victim has had the less sympathy they recieve

22
Q

Explain each stage of the juror decision making process

A
  1. orientation period relaxed discussion, exploration of facts
  2. open confrontation, debate focus on details interpretation of facts, pressure to conform
  3. reconciliation, smooth conflict with humour
23
Q

explain the differences between informational and normative conformity

A

Asch
informational- individual conform because they don’t know what to do and look to the group for guidance
normative- individuals outwardly conform to avoid rejection, inwardly disagree

24
Q

Myers 2001

A

90% of cases the position of the majority prior to discussion becomes the verdict

25
Q

Explain group polarisation

A

Hastie showed a Murder trial to 69 mock witnesses is the length of the discussion only strengthened the peoples preferences

26
Q

McConville

A

Judges had serious doubts about the verdict in 36% of cases that were acquitted

27
Q

Greene

A

Though there is room for improvement research shows that juries do a reasonable job of weighing evidence and applying the law

28
Q

groupthink

A

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.