Lectures Flashcards
different types of computational modelling have radically different…
assumptions about the nature of cognition
most forms of computational modelling…
involve some form of simulating a cognitive process
ie. input -> “model” -> behavioural output
models are different on their level of analysis
Marr’s levels:
- neural
- algorithmic
- computational
how does computational modelling aid in understanding human behaviour?
by establishing a concrete definition of a cognitive process
origins of modelling
computer simulations have been popular since early years of psychology
the importance of computation was recognized at an early stage ie. Turing in 1950
Weiner (1948) and Shannon (1949) conducted early mathematical theories of information and communications
Society for Computation in Psychology
Weiner and Shannon
Weiner (1948) and Shannon (1949)
conducted early work in mathematical theories of information and communications
Society for Computation in Psychology
formed in 1971
one of the early subgroups of cognitive psychology
prof is a member
2 types of analytical models
- recognition memory experiment
- signal detection theory
recognition memory experiment
presented with a list of words
presented with pictures of those words
tested for old or new words
sometimes falsely accept things that didn’t occur
signal detection theory
measurement of the difference between two distinct patterns
first pattern is the one you’re supposed to pay attention to
second pattern involves the random noise that distracts a person/machine’s ability to collect and process info
essentially looks at how easy/difficult it is for someone to process info and respond to it when they’re also being exposed to background noise/distractions
the primary model type we’ll look at in this course…
simulation models
output of model isn’t deterministic
underlying randomness in the model (typically implemented with random number generators)
mind as computer
Pylyshyn 1984
mind takes in information from senses
integrates them and creates perceptual experience and behaviour
knowledge acquisition: Plato vs Chomsky
Plato: knowledge must be gained via experience
Chomsky: we are born with innate knowledge and learning mechanisms
poverty of the stimulus
there is no way that we must hear every form of language we produce in order to learn it
we produce more language than we experience
and all possible language is even greater than the language we produce
the difference between ‘language experienced’ and ‘language produced’ is accounted for through…
innate knowledge
possible solution: Simon (1969)
discussing the path taken by an ant on a beach, Simon noted that the ant’s path is “irregular, complex, hard to describe. but its complexity is really a complexity in the surface of the beach, not a complexity in the ant.
big data and natural language processing
collection of large text sources has changed how we think about studying language
possible to propose learning mechanism and train on realistic data
a model can be “born” into a realistic language environment
we then gain insights into cognition and language performance by examining how the model learns and functions
also is a powerful natural language processing tool
T/F: virtual environments are approaching real world complexity levels
true
language learning: bi-directional benefit
we benefit from using large, realistic text sources because we can train models on them
the models give us insight into cognition/language performance/learning
also become powerful natural language processing tools
corpus-driven modelling
identifies strong tendencies for words/grammatical constructions to pattern together in particular ways
while other theoretically possible combos rarely occur
corpus-driven modelling allow for…
connections between lexical experience and lexical behaviour
first corpus ever
Brown corpus of Kucera and Francis
1967
consisted of about 1 million words, sampled from different areas
examples of text-based resources now available for use for corpus-driven modelling
Grade 1-12 textbooks
Scientific journal articles
Newspaper articles
Wikipedia
TV and movie subtitles
Books
Urban dictionary
distributional models of semantics
usage-based model of meaning
based on assumption that statistical distribution of linguistic items in context plays key role in characterizing their semantic behaviour
distributional models build semantic representations by extracting co-occurrences from corpora
internal versus external theories of cognition
internal: involves attending internally to thoughts, memories and mental imagery
external: involves attending to stimuli in the external environment
brain, body, environment
organization of long term memory
long term memory
splits into:
explicit/declarative (conscious) and implicit (unconscious)
explicit/declarative splits into:
semantic (events, experiences) and episodic memory (facts, concepts)
implicit splits into:
priming and procedural memory (skills, tasks)
explicit/declarative memory splits into…
- semantic memory (events, experiences)
- episodic memory (facts, concepts)
implicit memory splits into…
- priming
- procedural memory (skills, tasks)
semantic memory
refers to what you know
events, experiences
how is semantic memory tied to language?
not necessarily tied to language, but intimately connected
language is a general organizing principle of memory
lexical semantic memory
memory of word meanings
study of semantic memory examines…
storage and retrieval
modern theories of semantics
based in experience
environment serves as model/constraints
2 branches of “based in experience” theories of semantics
- grounded/embodied theories
- our perceptual world (and our brains, which are embodied) is used as our main info source to understand the world around us - text-based machine learning
frontal lobe
language processing
emotional regulation
executive functioning
planning
organizing
memory
impulse control
problem solving
selective focus
decision making
behavioural control
temporal lobe
episodic memory
(involved in comprehension, storage and retrieval of memory)
hearing ability
- first area that processes speech info, turns it into a linguistic code
memory acquisition
some visual perceptions
categorization of objects
comprehension
memory retrieval
perisylvian region
area of brain responsible for language
composed of:
- primary auditory cortex
- wernicke’s area
- angular gyrus
- arcuate fasciculus
- primary motor cortex
- broca’s area
wernicke’s area
constructs rep of meaning for linguistic info
damage from stroke to this area = fluent/receptive aphasia
- loss of ability to understand and create meaningful language
- grammatically correct but incorrect meaning
broca’s area
responsible for linguistic production
damage from stroke to this area = non-fluent/productive aphasia
- loss of ability to produce fluent language
- but can still understand language
wernicke’s location
posterior temporal lobe
many connections to primary auditory cortex
heavily connected to Broca’s area
wernicke’s = important for…
storage and retrieval of word representations, meanings, grammar
broca’s location
posterior inferior frontal region
next to primary motor cortex (responsible for muscles used to produce speech)
sometimes called motor speech areea
arcuate fasiculus
connection between Wernicke’s and Broca’s area
important for BOTH phonological and lexical-semantic processing
early theory of semantic memory - devised by Collins & Quillian
hierarchical networks
hierarchical networks
Collins & Quillian
suggest our info in memory is organized hierarchically - can be repped by a tree
- superordinate at the top
- as you continue down the network, get more subordinate info
what kind of info is at the bottom of the tree in hierarchical networks?
actual instances of a category
if information is stored in the brain in the way suggested by hierarchical networks, then there should be a corresponding connection between…
the amount of time it takes you to find connections between these properties
direct connections will be faster
think about it like walking from point to point
living thing: example of hierarchical network
living thing - connects to propositions “is” and “can” and then to “grow” and “living”
living thing: connects to propositions “is a” and then to either
1. plant
2. animal
plant - connects to “is a”
1. tree
2. flower
these eventually link into specific examples
- pine, oak, rose, daisy
how did Collins and Quillian test if the timing of their network in validating closeness of associations actually applies to human processes?
gave people a sentence that was true or false
had them say whether it was true or false
ie. ‘a canary can sing’, ‘can walk’, ‘has skin’
- looking at properties progressively higher up in the network
turns out that increasingly high properties take longer to validate
are Collins & Quillian’s findings supported in all categories?
no, not validated in all categories
a good first step, but not exhaustive