Lecture Week 10 Flashcards
Causation
Plaintiff must show defendants unreasonable conduct caused the injury suffered by the Plaintiff
factual Causation
Requires the plaintiff to show there is a factual connection between unreasonable conducts and the injury
What are the tests for factual causation?
Single Cause, Multiple Cause, Uncertainty
Single Cause test
if there is only one cause for the injury, then the courts may apply the “but for” test for factual causation
“but for” test
Plaintiff must show that but for the defendants unreasonable conduct the injury would not have occured
Multiple causes test
If there are possible more than one cause for the injury, courts apply the “substantial factor” test
P must show that D’s act was more than likely the cause of the injury
Uncertainty
In some cases, there might be uncertainty as the cause of P’s injury
This requires expert testimony
Proximate Causation
Requires p to show that the injury is not the remote consequence of D's unreasonable conduct Two tests 1. Directness 2. Foresee-ability Legal Policy also considered
Directness Case
If the injury can be directly connected to the unreasonable conduct without an unforeseeable intervening cause the unreas conduct is the legal cause
Superseding Cause
unforeseeable intervening cause that will cut off liability of original actor
foresee-ability Test
If the injury is the foreseeable consequence of the unreasonable conduct then then the unreasonable conduct is the legal cause
Exception: Egg shell plaintiff- D is liable for all personal injuries that are the direct and factual result of the unreas conduct even if the injury was not foreseeable
You take the plaintiff as you find him