LECTURE 9 - sovereignty regimes, institutions Flashcards
sovereignty and autonomy (why was chavez upset with bush)
US frequently interferes with other countries
sov = NOT interfering with a country
why did the 1949 Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of States not get made into law?
- lack of consensus (especially after WW2)
Contradictions in the Sovereignty Regime
regime: a system or planned way of doing things, especially one imposed from above.
Principles (beliefs), norms
(general standards), rules
(specific prescriptions/
proscriptions) and decision-
making processes
(collective choice rules)
around which actors’
expectations converge.
* System of governance for a
particular issue area.
How do Article 6 & 7 reconcile with Article 3
“Every State has the duty to refrain from
intervention in the … affairs of any other
State”?
protecting sov
- layers of sov get complicated - ie. canada selling things to saudi too be used in yemen
- main actor in IL = states
- sov = exertion of authority
why sov matters
- weak level of authority (lack of state presence) = make space for instability
- ^^ lack of state presence in the south of Mozambique - this leads us to civil war
- even in some repressive states, there is an element of predictability
Keeping control of territory, exercising authority
* Weak sovereignty creates space for instability
* Selective application and pursuit of sovereignty
* Northern Mozambique traditionally neglected by power centre in Maputo
* Legacy of civil war
* Where did the weapons come from? The idea to pursue armed rebellion?
* Sovereignty as contingent upon social contract fulfilment from State
Q: What do you do if the violent sovereignty-violating actor is not a state?
A: RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT principle: national response, UN, int coop
How does anything get done internationally
if sovereignty means:
* one state can’t tell tother states what to do,
* one state is not allowed to directly coerce
another
* individual states are free to operate internally as
they wish, bounded by provisos that are
unenforceable because of autonomy, and
* there is no centralized ‘centre of command’ that
can impose resolution?
Regimes:
* a means by which States attempt to overcome
collective action problems (scenario in which there is conflict between the individual interest and the group interest)
Why do States form regimes?
States see suboptimal outcomes from
independent decision-making and seek
to develop collective decision-making
and collective behavior to achieve better
outcomes
* Conflict – independent decision-making by
different states leads to suboptimal outcomes
* Harmony – independent decision-making by
different states leads to acceptable outcomes
* Cooperation – interdependent decision-
making by different states leads to better
outcomes than available under conflict.
Cooperation as attempt to resolve situations
that would otherwise become conflict
* A search to find an optimal solution to
a collective challenge
why Regimes ≠ International Institutions
- Int inst: facilitate INTERdependance that allowed us to get where we are now
- come up with platform to make things exchangeable (avocados between Mexico and canada)
- wto - manage info on trade treaties, adjudicate trade disputes
- states come here to avoid conflict
- purpose of UN: prevent war
Regimes form around ideas, sets of beliefs,
don’t need formal structure
* i.e., the international human rights
regime
* i.e., the international neoliberal regime
* International Institutions form when there is
sufficient agreement on need for ongoing
coordination that the mechanism is given
formal legal form
* You can have a regime without and
international institution, but you almost never
have an international institution without at
least one underpinning regime
Int inst
- Formal and informal in nature
- Run by rules and norms
- International Law central
element to most - Set up with specific treaties
- An arrangement to coordinate
different actors in the
international system - Constructed by states for specific
purposes
3 key functions of institutions
- Coordinate global linkages
* Internet, telecomms, postal service - Respond to common problems
* Environment, natural disaster, poverty - Protecting core values
* Human rights, liberal capitalism
why do states abide by institutions?
***- no overarching auth to make us follow rules of institutions
- anarchical int order - operates by actors IN the order
- to not abide by the rules of int ints = too expensive
- constantly subject to attack = they would have to time to invest in progress= not sustainable
- small/middle power cope w powerful countries = you like institutions and multilateralism (participation by 3 or more parties, especially countries) - cheaper to abide by it than to constantly engage in oppressive politics
- Question of managing
transaction costs - Follow rules so have
predictability later on - Reduces enforcement
costs for major powers - Protection