Lecture 9 Driving Behaviour Flashcards
What are some interventions that work when it comes to reducing accidents?
Speed enforcement
RBT
Seat belts and airbags
Traffic calming
What are some interventions that don’t work at reducing accidents?
Vehicle control training
Compulsory skid training
Interventions that sometimes do and sometimes don’t work when it comes to reducing accidents ?
Anti-locking braking systems. In car - increased risk. Out of car - decreased risk.
What is the distinction between the two aspects of accident - related driver behaviour in the literature?
Driving style (risk-taking behaviour) Driving skill (driver performance/ability)
What are some vehicle characteristics that increase risk taking?
Newer vehicles associated with higher accident involvement.
Studded tyres drive faster in icy conditions.
Anti-lock brakes driver closer to cars in front.
Greater acceleration capability pull into smaller gaps.
Adaptive cruise control travel faster, closer to the car in front and brake harder.
What is an issue with the fact that cars are being made quieter?
car noise correlates with vehicle motion and therefore people lose an information source about the speed of their cars
How did Horswill and McKenna (1999) manipulate speed choice without drivers knowing about it?
They had 115 ps assigned to 2 groups. Both groups did the validated video-based test of speed choice (would you drive faster or slower than this vehicle…). One group had loud auditory feedback and the other had quiet auditory feedback. Those in the loud group chose significantly slower speeds.
What are some theories about why people choose to go faster when car noise is reduced ?
Reducing car noise makes driving speeds appear to be slower Hence people compensate by speeding up.
And inter-sensory integration of information suggests that the perceptual system combines senses to get a reliable estimate of the environmental state (ie. uses all senses to assess environment)
Describe the study by Horswill and Plooy (2008) that looks at whether auditory cues influence speed estimation.
Used the method of constant stimuli to show ps a video sequence of a car travelling along a clear road. The speed of the car was either speeded up or slowed down. Ps were shown pairs of scenes and had to judge which was the fastest. Meanwhile the reference scene was either played with normal or reduced sound (-5dB). Found that reducing car noise made a reference vehicle appear to be travelling nearly 5kph slower.
By how much does the magnitude of risk increase when cars are travelling 65kph as opposed to 60kph ? (Accounting for reducing noise effects)
Fatality risk increases by 35%.
Why didn’t a Masters Drivers license ever progress to encourage increased drivers skill?
Because Williams and O’Neill (1974) found that highly skilled drivers had more accidents on public record than those in a control group.
What is the only competent of driving skill that has been found to reduce accidents ?
Hazard Perception
What is the range of correlations found for hazard perception and accident involvement? Is this practically important ? (Describe the study by Horswill et al (2010) which looks at self-reported crash risk and hazard perception).
Hazard perception and accident involvement correlates between .11 and .28. Yes it is practically important. Horswill et al (2010) looked at the relationship between self - reported crash risk and hazard perception in drivers over 65 and found that those who failed hazard perception were 2.37 times are likely to crash.
Why are effect sizes so small when looking at hazard perception and crash involvement ?
Becuase car crashes are rare.
Accidents are caused by multiple factors.
Accident involvement is a psychometric nightmare.
Why is accident involvement a psychometric nightmare?
Because accident involvement correlates with itself by .31.
And accident reporting is subject to tonnes of biases (people forget they were in crashes, people unlikely to report minor crashes, controlling for exposure is an issue)