Lecture 9: Conservation Planning Flashcards

1
Q

With limited funds, conservation planners must focus their efforts on high priority areas. In choosing priorities, conservation planners must address three questions. What are they?

A
  1. What needs to be protected?
  2. Where should it be protected?
  3. How should it be protected?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In establishing priorities, what three criteria are used to answer the first two questions:

A
  1. Distinctiveness
  2. Endangerment
  3. Utility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Distinctiveness

A
  • essentially means irreplaceability

- how unique is the list of candidates that we would never be able to restore, how distinct is it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Endangerment

A
  • the same thing as vulnerability of a species to extinction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Utility

A
  • if a particular ecosystem is important to people
  • humans get a use out of it
  • i.e. a watershed that provides water to all of New York
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Utilizing the above criteria, several prioritization approaches have been developed. What are they (3 of them)

A
  1. the species approach (small)
  2. the hotspot approach
  3. the ecosystem approach (big)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Focal species

A
  • species that provide the impetus to protect an area and ecosystems
  • the species focused on by conservation planners used in their conservation efforts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Species Approach:

- protected areas are often established to protect individual species of concern such as…

A
  • rare species
  • endangered species
  • keystone species
  • culturally significant species (if we lost them we would not be able to substitute them)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are three different types of focal species?

A
  1. Indicator
  2. Flagship
  3. Umbrella
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the species approach?

A
  • protected areas are often established to protect individual species of concern
    • rare species
    • endangered species
    • keystone species
    • culturally significant species (if we lost them we would not be able to substitute them)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Indicator species

A

species that are associated with an endangered biological community or set of unique ecosystem processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

List one example of an indicator species

A

E.g. the Northern Spotted Owl is associated with old growth and mature forest in the Pacific Northwest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Flagship species

A
  • usually large and well known species that capture public attention, have symbolic value, and/or are crucial to ecotourism
  • often include ‘charismatic megafauna’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Charismatic megafauna

A

they are big sexy animals (i.e. the Giant Panda is associated with WWF, tigers, humpback whales, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an example of a flagship species?

A

E.g., Giant Panda is recognizable the world over and has been adopted as the symbol of WWF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Umbrella species

A

Flagship and indicator species whose protection automatically extends protection to other species and the community

17
Q

What is an example of an umbrella species?

A

E.g., 18 Project Tiger reserves were created in India after surveys revealed that Bengal Tigers were near extinction
- in protecting the tiger they also protected 18 of the highest quality forested fragment/lands in India

18
Q

What are some problems are the species approach?

A
  • by focusing on species we might be ignoring greater ecosystem processes
  • by focusing on species we are potentially protecting cute fuzzy species and not protecting other species that are equally important
  • by focusing on species we might be missing other non-biological things of importance, i.e. a geological feature or a scenic vista
19
Q

What is the hotspot approach?

A

rather than focus on single species, another approach is to focus on regions that are deemed of high conservation value

20
Q

What 3 criteria is the hotspot approach usually based on?

A
  1. High species richness
  2. High endemism
  3. high rate of habitat loss
21
Q

What approach is usually based on these three criteria:

  1. High species richness
  2. High endemism
  3. high rate of habitat loss
A

the hotspot approach

22
Q

Biodiversity indicator

A

organisms or groups of organisms that are used to identify hotspots when data about whole ecosystems are unavailable

23
Q

What is an example of a biodiversity indicator?

A

E.g., Myers et al. (2000) identified 25 global hotspots based on 2,500 endemic plant species that have lost at least 70% of their primary vegetation

24
Q

Can the hotspot approach can also be used on a national or regional scale?

A

Yes,

  • e.g. in the US, species richness is exceptionally high in 6 areas (Hawaii not shown)
  • The Nature Conservancy focuses its land acquisition funds to regions targeted by this approach
25
The hotspot approach: Sometimes conservation priorities differ depending upon the criteria used. List an example
E.g., Orme et al. (2005) examined hotspots using species richness, threatened, species, and endemic species and found them to result in different high priority areas
26
What are some problems with the hotspot approach?
- using hotspots to guide the establishment of protected areas has the consequence of forfeiting other important areas - spectacular wildlife areas that are relatively species poor - e.g., the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem harbors the last complete assemblage of large mammals in the lower 47 states - area is cool (unique geological features) but not many species there - areas that provide exceptionally important ecosystem services - e.g., Spartina marshes along the northern Gulf of Mexico coast has only 20-30 plant species, yet this area serves as an essential fish nursery and as a buffer against tropical storms - not very many species in marsh
27
What is the ecosystem approach?
- using this approach, as many representative types as possible are protected - aka ecoregion approach - analysis of 13 biomes shows that the amount of protected land varies considerably - temperate grasslands, mediterranean forests, and tropical forests should be the highest conservation priority
28
What are some problems of the ecosystem approach?
- since ecoregions don't follow political boundaries, it can be difficult to get governments to cooperate to prioritize efforts within ecoregions - in the face of climate change, ecoregions are shifting - since political boundaries may be more stable than ecosystems, it may make more sense to plan using political boundaries
29
Gap analysis
- a methodology to help organizations identify which sites to protect by comparing biodiversity priorities with existing and proposed protected areas
30
What are some examples of gap analysis?
- E.g., a gap analysis of 12,000 vertebrate species found that 12% were found in no protected area, and an additional 12% occurred only in small areas or those with weak protection - E.g., another study mapped 794 animal and plant species that were in imminent danger of extinction at 595 sites around the world - many were at unprotected sites
31
Gap analysis model
- the model provides a solid theoretical framework for the decision-making process, and has been used many times - however, applying scientific rigor at key stages is difficult, especially when information is unavailable (or unaffordable) - value judgements and arbitrary scoring also come into play - land managers are often caught up in politics, fund-raising public relations, and competing demands for land resources, which further complicates strict application of the model
32
Geographic Information Systems
- Conservation planners increasingly combine gap analysis with GIS - Integrate a wide variety of data for analysis and display - E.g., existing endangered species distributions, existing protected areas, areas of remaining habitat, and areas of human disturbance - Such techniques can also lead to a prediction of where rare species may occur